Nobody downloaded yet

Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This research compares the play “Trifles” and the story “A Jury of Her Peers”. The paper tells that the story is more detailed and explicit than the play, providing extra information about the relationships between all three women characters…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.3% of users find it useful
Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers"

Download file to see previous pages This research will begin with the statement that Susan Glaspell’s play “Trifles” was written in 1916 and then reworked into a short story entitled “A Jury of her Peers” in the following year. The content is very similar to each version. Both pieces tell the story of a murder investigation. In both cases, the main suspect, Mrs. Wright, is much discussed, but she never appears. The women deduce that Mrs. Wright has been abused by her husband, and they cover up incriminating details so that the men do not find sufficient evidence to convict Mrs. Wright of the murder of her husband. The play shows how the men notice different things than the women, while the story allows an even more nuanced judgment of the various characters. The play begins with the investigation of the Wright household. The men proceed according to the letter of the law as written and enacted by men. The Sheriff, for example, dismisses the evidence of the domestic environment by looking around and saying “There’s nothing here but kitchen things.” The play’s title is an ironic reference to the domestic objects and activities which make up the majority of women’s lives in this period. The way the kitchen looks and the condition of objects within it are factors which bear witness to what happened to this woman. Only women can read and understand these signs, while men think they are unimportant and do not look closely enough at the detail. When the women look at the preparations that were underway in the kitchen they see what has happened. Mrs Peters says “she had bread set.” (p. 12) This looks, on the surface, like a simple observation. Both women understand the context of bread-making, however, and they realize that something must have interrupted Mrs Wright, because normally a housewife would not leav bread half made. The play illustrates the complicity of the three women.
These subtle connections are difficult to convey in dramatic form on the stage, and this may be why one performance of the play had mixed reviews. A modern production of the play in East Village, Manhattan, performed in February 2010, received mixed reviews (Jaworowski, 2010). The director introduced elements to enhance the dramatic atmosphere: “Extended pauses have been inserted throughout, creating long silences; characters often abruptly stop for 5 or 10 seconds between lines or in the middle of dialogue.” (Jaworowski, 2010) Jaworowski finds this pretentious, and implies that the audience also were nervous and not sure how to interpret the silences. Other additions such as wordless singing and musical accompaniment, as well as lighting effects, help to convey “an eerie, affecting mood that lingers after the show ends.” (Jaworowski, 2010) The rising tension is conveyed effectively by these novel means, but the reflective side of the short story is largely lost. The intimacy of the reader sitting alone and imagining the meaningful looks between the women is a more effective technique than any real life visual representation could manage. On stage an actor has to use body posture, timing, and facial impressions to indicate what the character is thinking. The subject matter of this play is subtle, and so it is extremely difficult to convey the solidarity of women in their thinking. The written form is simply better at showing nuances of judgement about characters.
In contrast to the play the story’s title “A Jury of Her Peers” uses legal language to point out that the peers of Mrs Wright are not the sheriff, the attorney and assembled male jurors, but in fact women like herself who can understand the pressures she has suffered in her life. In a way the story is a plea for the right of women to be judged by women, and not by a sexist legal system which is subject to male prejudice, while the play is more like a debate about the two perspectives.
The story is more detailed and explicit than the play, providing extra information about the relationships between all three women characters. The narrative voice ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell
The women companions of the investigators rose above all the trivial expectations which men had from their female counterparts, and play a role which is for a large cause and pro-feminist in nature.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
The Role of Irony, Symbol, and Setting the Issue of Gender Differences in Susan Glaspell's Trifles
However, as the play progresses, one gets a glimpse of how men and women in America in the early 20th century would define their roles according to their gender. Gender is the major determining force that governed men and women in the past and it may still be true at present.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Feminist Inquiries in Trifles
With that said, a close look will be taken into the male and female perspectives of Susan Glaspell’s Trifles to highlight the parallel between the two perspectives and illustrate the means by which women, in attempting to thrive in a patriarchal society, might make choices that defame their gender.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Jury of her Peers
She effectively uses ironies and mystery to depict women’s ability to differ between right and wrong. Also by upholding these differences between male and female perspectives, she attempts to show that women are also capable of planning and, finally, of executing their plans.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers
In “Trifles”, Susan examines John Hossac who was murdered as a result of which Susan reported the story while working as a journalist. In this story, Susan explores the perceptions that men had about women during the time when the story was written. In addition to “Trifles”, there is also “A jury of her Peers”, also related to Susan.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Textual Analysis of Trifles (AKA A Jury of Her Peers)
Two men, the Sheriff, and the County Attorney open the play, which is set in the socio-economic upheavals of the patriarchal American society in the wake of the 20th century (Al-Khalili 132), and the plot of the story revolves around an investigation of the murder of John Wright.
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
Trifles ( A Play) by Susan Glaspell
The characters and events in Susan Glaspell’s Trifles help describe the discrimination that American men afforded their women during the time when the play was written. First of all, the female characters in the play are addressed only as “Mrs” followed by their
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Trifles vs Ajury of her peers
The titles “A Jury and Her Peers” and “Trifles” insinuates the focus that the play and the book takes. The play “trifles” focuses more on the objects especially the objects used to judge Foster. One can observe that each episode has a particular
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Comparing Susan Glaspells Play Trifles with her Short Story A Jury of
Alkalay-Gut in her article “Jury of Her Peers: The Importance of Trifles” has emphasized that the wide gap between male and female perceptions constructs the bedrock of A Jury of Her Peers. The story surpasses
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Research essay
Also, among her popular works is the short story, the jury by her peers, which she authored after the play. The two are very similar in terms of the characters and the story which is a continuation from the play. The play and short story however differ in some way
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Trifles and A Jury of Her Peers for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us