Download file to see previous pages...
“A Jury and Her Peers” on the other hand gives a lot of focus on the characters in the story compared to the objects. It has focused greatly focuses on Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hales character( Gainor, 243 ). The story gives a lot of description that gives the reader deeper access into the minds of the character which would be hard to get by just watching the characters on stage. As such, the readers are able to focus more on the characters in the short stories and not object like in the play.
Despite the fact that the male characters have been given less focus in the play and the story, we can see that the story gives greater depth in developing the male characters. This could be attributed to the narrative nature of a story where Susan describes the character in the short story in greater details opening the imagination of the reader (Gainor, 238). The reader also gets to know more about the male characters by reading the short stories compared to watching them act on stage in the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that in contrast to the play the story’s title “A Jury of Her Peers” uses legal language to point out that the peers of Mrs. Wright are not the sheriff, the attorney and assembled male jurors, but in fact women like herself who can understand the pressures she has suffered in her life.
This story has attracted the need understand how Susan Glaspell uses dialogue and visual symbols that largely surrounds the murder of a local farmer by his wife, to build up the idea that a chasm of misunderstanding exists between women and men. “A jury of her peers” greatly focuses on the various predicaments that are usually faced by women in a society that is dominated by men.
She denies the accusation and pleads ignorance as to what happened. Henry Peters, the Sheriff, George Henderson, the County Attorney, and Lewis Hale, a neighboring farmer, are in the house along with Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale. The officials search in vain for evidence which could provide a motive for the murder.
She effectively uses ironies and mystery to depict women’s ability to differ between right and wrong. Also by upholding these differences between male and female perspectives, she attempts to show that women are also capable of planning and, finally, of executing their plans.
In “Trifles”, Susan examines John Hossac who was murdered as a result of which Susan reported the story while working as a journalist. In this story, Susan explores the perceptions that men had about women during the time when the story was written. In addition to “Trifles”, there is also “A jury of her Peers”, also related to Susan.
Susan Glaspell's A Jury of Her Peers tackles this issue as two women tried to explore the life of Minnie Foster and her transformation to being Mrs. Wright, who is convicted of killing her husband in his sleep. This paper intends to focus on how the short story confronts this issue on feminine oppression in terms of the prevailing sexism and imposed social pressures particularly to married women.
responding to Glaspell’s story, Showalter writes that there should be no need for special juries to preside trial in cases in which women are the defendants. The best defense, according to Showalter, should involve full revelation of the evidence in an open and transparent
ng genres in the point of its possible hidden secrets of the plot as well as other factors, such as possible mysterious background, social, spiritual, political and economic issues, which are brought up to the foreground by a playwriter’s concept and are represented by
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Trifles vs Ajury of her peers for FREE!