Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/english/1617816-trifles-vs-ajury-of-her-peers
https://studentshare.org/english/1617816-trifles-vs-ajury-of-her-peers.
Dissimilarity between the Play “Trifles” and the narrative “A Jury of Her Peers” The two works of art are similar in many ways with small modifications in the plot. The dialogues in the narrative “A Jury of Her Peers” are actually lifted from the play without a lot of distortion. The differences in the two therefore lie in the characterization and the title of the book. The titles “A Jury and Her Peers” and “Trifles” insinuates the focus that the play and the book takes. The play “trifles” focuses more on the objects especially the objects used to judge Foster.
One can observe that each episode has a particular object that informs the readers more about the events taking place. “A Jury and Her Peers” on the other hand gives a lot of focus on the characters in the story compared to the objects. It has focused greatly focuses on Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hales character( Gainor, 243 ). The story gives a lot of description that gives the reader deeper access into the minds of the character which would be hard to get by just watching the characters on stage.
As such, the readers are able to focus more on the characters in the short stories and not object like in the play. Despite the fact that the male characters have been given less focus in the play and the story, we can see that the story gives greater depth in developing the male characters. This could be attributed to the narrative nature of a story where Susan describes the character in the short story in greater details opening the imagination of the reader (Gainor, 238). The reader also gets to know more about the male characters by reading the short stories compared to watching them act on stage in the play.
Work CitedGainor, J E. Susan Glaspell in Context: American Theater, Culture, and Politics, 1915 - 48. Ann Arbor, Mich: Univ. of Michigan Press, 2004. Print.
Read More