Preparation for Language Seminar - Essay Example

CATEGORYPreparationThe preparation for the seminar involved both me and my partner first agreeing on the macro skill to handle. After selecting grammar as the macro skill to focus on, we then selected ten sample tests assessing test takers on grammar. From these ten, three sample tests were selected to be analyzed in the seminar. We then read extensively on the rules of grammar and testing languages. This guided us in answering the tests and pointing out the techniques and approaches used in testing languages.

Relevant ArgumentsInitially, we had critiqued all tests collectively but found out that it was not effective. We therefore resorted to analysing each test separately from which we came up with a performance-based test that compensated for the weaknesses in the three sample tests. The critique covered all the aspects of critical evaluation including reliability, validity, practicality, impact, interactiveness, and authenticity. This was informed by lecture notes and relevant course texts. These sources guided us in coming up with the new performance-based test, hence a more useful test than the sample tests.

Presentation and QuestioningThe structure of the presentation was systematic, evaluating each test separately which made it effective. Among the strengths of this presentation included the evaluation of varied tests and supporting the arguments with credible sources. More so, the answers to the tests were given thus making it simple to follow up the arguments. Having undertaken a thorough literature review and practiced the presentation, we were confident in our presentation. We responded to all arising questions at the end of the presentation which clarified unclear arguments.

Whereas this ensured a flow in the presentation, the audience was disadvantaged as most had forgotten their concerns by the end of the presentation.Time-ManagementThe time allocated for the presentation was adequate and all issues were covered at considerable speed. Working together blended well with my partner and we considered each other views in selecting the sample and performance-based tests and in the critique. From each other, we learned so much and our presentation was a reflection of what we both agreed on.

ImprovementIn the future, we endeavor to fully understand the task from the available literature before wholly embarking on it.CATEGORYPreparationWe met as partners and decided from the list of skills which one we should focus on and the relevant test samples that we should choose. After negotiation, we agreed to focus on grammar and thus selected grammar parts of three test samples. Before embarking on the task, we did an extensive literature review from textbooks and lecture notes which were to guide us in appropriately responding to the task.

Relevant ArgumentsAfter this preparation, we answered and then critiqued the sample tests based on six qualities of usefulness: practicality, impact, validity, reliability, interactiveness, and authenticity. The arguments were backed by relevant literature earlier identified. This critique guided us in coming up with a performance-based test that aimed at improving the sample tests. The strengths of the performance-based test over the sample tests were given. Presentation and QuestioningWe presented each test separately with its critique which made it simple to follow the presentation.

Even though taken at the end of the presentation, questions were encouraged from the students with both of us responding to them to the best of our knowledge. The summarising table at the end of the presentation was an advantage in the presentation.Time-ManagementAllowing questions at the end of the presentation ensured that we manage time well. More so, we had practiced prior to the final presentation which helped us time ourselves appropriately. Working together instead of each one working on a different part and then combining at the end, we did the whole task together, engaging in arguments that led us to present the best-agreed responses.

ImprovementI would propose an increase in the size of the team so as to increase the range of knowledge and make the group task more engaging and effective.