A Comparasion of Rack Supprted Warehouse vs. Conventional Steel Frame Buildings - Research Paper Example

The easy analyzes or compares two structural styles, that is rack supported warehouse and conventional buildings. In conventional building or steel frame design, the building utilizes the skeleton frame of the horizontal trusses or beams and vertical column of steel (Fischer, 2009, p.78). Usually the building is constructed in the rectangular grid so that it supports the walls and roof, which is well attached to the frame. Then the building is later equipped with freestanding or agonistic racks for the material storage.

The building is comprised of total storage rack system; the rack system are the basic structural support for both roof and walls of the building, sometimes the roof and the walls of the building are referred as skin (Goetsch, 2004, p.34). The building design for steel frame can be classified into two different designs; the first design is called hot rolled steel industrial building design and the other is cold form steel building design. The conventional steel frame designs are expensive to construct, therefore, it not to be economical (Goodno, 2010, p.12). Rack supported warehouse are found to be economical due to their simple design and structure.

The structure offer highest height, which increases its storage capacity (Hiatt, 2002, p.34). For conventional steel buildings, it is someway not quick and efficient in construction. The main reason for it not to be quick, the building are designed from the beginning or are designed from scratch as it is the consultant who designs with fewer designing aid available for an engineer (Koontz, 2012,p.12). In adition conventional steel building, the main steel are chosen from typical hot rolled “I” parts that are in numerous segments of the constituents which are heavier than what is usually required for a design (Yudelson, 2006, p.13). These constituents