Analysis of Articles about Plagiarism and Collusion - Annotated Bibliography Example

Title: Article Summaries Name: Your ID no: Unit code and Name: Lecturer name Assignment Due Date: Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 1 Collaboration, Collusion and Plagiarism in Computer Science Coursework The issue of academic dishonesty has been in place for many years and it affects all courses, as many students often want to excel through shortcuts. However, this paper will focus on computer coursework even though all aspects discussed affect and apply to other areas of academic pursuance. Notably, computer science has been prone to a considerable amount of cheating (Roberts, 2002). This is because in computer science, approximately all the assignments’ questions tend to have an ideal solution thus there are high chances that the appropriate solutions will be the same (Roberts, 2002). some of the main causes of cheating include lack of motivation, an inflated sense of pride and lack of proper foundational training on the effects of the vice (Roberts, 2002). Barrett and Cox (2005) are of the opinion that computer science and mathematics are often subjected to high level of collision due to the nature of work engaged in these areas. Students to cheat as the assignments often force the student to go through frustrating and exhausting process in order to get the correct answers thus easily prone to cheating to make their work easy (Riedesel et al., 2012; Simon et al., 2013). Due to the nature of mathematics and computer science, students are always encouraged to embrace group work, however, it becomes difficult to distinguish between allowable and unallowable group work. Collaboration with regard to school work is allowed by teachers and instructors as it is part of the learning techniques and the school’s main objective is for the students to comprehensively understand the learning materials they given. On the other hand, writing assignment solution together is prohibited and is usually referred as collusion. Thus, students are allowed to engage in collaboration but not collusion (Barrett & Cox, 2005). Plagiarism, which can also be referred to as literary theft in simple terms means taking the work or ideas of others and passing them as one’s own (OED, 2011. Lastly, to curb the menace of cheating in computer science courses, learning institutions have come up with plagiarism software checkers as well as other measures to detect cheating and thus take disciplinary action on any student engaged in cheating. Article 2 Avoiding Plagiarism: guidance for nursing students With the ambiguous and much efforts involved in doing researches and critically coming up with sensible, authentic and logic evaluation, nursing students risk being engaged in plagiarism activities. However, this is often dangerous as it is considered a serious offence and attracts severe penalties that the penalties. Thus, to avoid such anomalies students need to be educated on how to avoid plagiarism in the work (Price, 2014). As Lorenz (2013) puts it, plagiarism can be defined as the use of other people’s work with regard to academic assignment and regarding them as one’s own without giving credit to the source of information. Students are encouraged to demonstrate a high level of reasoning as well as their reflection related others’ work thus avoiding (Ganske 2010). In addition, Ganske (2010) holds that students are often advised to explore the university’s study skills guidance materials in order to avoid plagiarism. These materials are significant as they alert the students about the assumption of learning that are related to education system specific. There are several reasons why plagiarism often arises. However, the main reason is related to the burgeoning diversity of various sources of information as well as the confusion and form that come along with acknowledging such information. Evering and Moorman (2012) claim that due to information sourcing from the websites, audio material, seminars, debates and blogs, students often get confused on the correct way of referencing such kind of information. Therefore, for students to avoid plagiarism, they need to study in a diligent and well-organized manner. Students must be involved in literature searches and engage in note-taking as well. Moreover, students should also, use quotations and paraphrasing appropriately in their coursework. However, using excessive quotes from others’ work is not appropriate as the students reasoning should play a significant role in the coursework (Price, 2013). In summation, students should consider a cautious use of hared information. This involves acknowledging the contributors of group project, seminar material and other big projects. Article 3 Analyzing and reducing plagiarism at university As Errami and Garner (2008) argue, plagiarism should be considered as the worst form of ethical misconduct with regard to scientific research. Moreover, they assert that duplication together with plagiarism as well as co-submission are some of the major sins as far as contemporaneous scientific publishing is concerned. According to the American Psychological Association (2001), plagiarism is considered as the presentation of considerable amounts of others’ work and claiming it as their own. This also applies to instances where the data sources are cited infrequently. The other form of plagiarism is referred to as self-plagiarism, where an individual presents his or her previous work as new and original material. Though not a legal issue with Regard to publication, it is a waste of worthy publication space (David, 2008). However, presenting a previous work with the aim of comparing, connecting and analyzing the new material is acceptable as it enhances experimental procedures thus promoting exquisite healthcare practices (American Psychological Association, 2010). According to Errami and Garner (2008), plagiarism has today become a global issue and one of the main reasons is because the increasing number of online publications, which makes it easy for an individual to copy and paste information to his or her document. Research indicates that the best way to limit plagiarism is to have an open discussion with students so that they can understand the perniciousness associated with plagiarism and the pride related to original work. As Errami and Garner (2008) suggest students should be given ample time to work on their assignments as lack of enough time is one of the major reasons student engage in plagiarism. In conclusion, Sanz de Acedo 2013 posit that the higher education should always ensure that it encourages metacognitive and creative skills so as to stimulate the creative potential in students, as a strategy to limit the temptation related to plagiarism. References American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf (Originally published 2003) Barrett, R., Cox, A.L. (2005). At least they are learning something: the hazy line between collaboration and collusion. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 107 122. David, D. (2008, March 6). Duplication spreads the word to a wider audience. Nature, 452, 29. doi:10.1038/452029b Ganske KM (2010) Moral Distress in Academia. tinyurl.com/mnn3cj6 (Last accessed: February 6 2014.) Lorenz JM (2013) Cheating & Plagiarism in Nursing. tinyurl.com/npgehjq (Last accessed:August 15, 2015) OED. (2011). Oxford English dictionary: plagiarism, n. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/144939?redirectedFrom=plagiarism Price B (2014) Avoiding plagiarism: guidance for nursing students. Nursingld Standard. 28, 26, 45-51. Date of submission: November 6 2013; date of acceptance: December 9 2013. Roberts, E. (2002). Strategies for promoting academic integrity in CS courses. Frontiers in Education, 3, F3G14–19. Sanz de Acedo, M.L. y Sanz de Acedo, M.T. (2013). How creative potential is related to metacognition. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 6(2), 69-81. doi: 10.1989/ejep.v6i2.104 Read More