Comprehensive Standardisation and Assessment of Higher Education Argument - Article Example

Running Head: Critical Thinking Name Institution Course Professor Date Comprehensive Standardisation and Assessment of Higher Education Argument Comprehensive Standardisation Increasing tertiary schooling without proper examination is not justifiable (1). (1.1) The reason is that, making such move without examining the procedure first satisfies the ego of the avaricious overseers and (1.2), such a move has led to development of workshop for specific cluster of distressing academics. (2) The population that is ever growing depending on education has been developed. (2.1) Specific Undergraduate programs for instance Law, seems to have developed into double degrees of rather advanced degrees that are complete-fee compensating. Other professional programs are now existing that are exclusively alumnus entry (2.2), the reason being (3) the move to destroy Institutions of Enhanced Education (4) The sector of TAFE has since been overwhelmed (5) also post-school learning privatisation has led to learning suicide being brought closer. (6) Employers are the right people who should ensure trainings and education are provided. Individuals are now responsible for taking care of proficient education and vocational teachings expenses (7). (8) A larger number of people are now making use of colleges and universities. People in most cases come to be known when they are in mid-twenties (8.1). Individuals normally clear their education having at least some obligation (9). Obtaining a masters certification seems to be a bit challenging as this degree at workplace is more competitive (10). Most individuals have pursued other means to start by seeking internships that are not paid (11). Practicum that exist in various courses has no need (12). An individual who is studying and working co-operatively in fields of their choice requires no practicum (12.1). The all-purpose rule existing is that no course in the university level should have practical section (13). In most situations, people learn most of the theory while at the university (13.1) while TAFE and schools of enhanced learning training people more on how to make a living (13.2). (14) The present type of education system is quite expensive to most individuals. The national government has a program that ensures each and every student receives 10,500 USD. The number of students from other states is 888,000 and they are responsible for producing money for higher education which is not a good idea (15). Provision of courses has incomprehensible overlaps through the 37 state universities and 2 private existing universities in Sydney (15.2). (16) 4 universities in Australia have more than 50, 000 students while in the other four universities the number of students is less than 10,000 in number. A highly accomplished state restores other institutions of education and teaching (17). Returning of some industry programs and commerce in guaranteeing teaching is crucial and oversupply does not exist (18). The individuals are not accountable for the expenses (18.1). The number of universities providing similar programs has reduced (19). Only one university should exist in Sydney (C). Argument evaluation The article presents an argument that focuses on providing reasons why there should only be a single university existing in Sydney. According to the author of the article, reduction in the university sector is crucial as opposed to a move to make it grow. The author clearly began the argument by protecting his thought through provision of clear reasons why tertiary learning need no expansion. The disagreement is that expansion of tertiary learning without enough analysis is not justifiable. The author sees such a move as a means to satisfy what the administrators want and such a move has led to creation of protected workshop for cheap academics. The administrators of any university should stress and ensure the quality of tertiary education. The truth about Australian tertiary learning is that the people are progressively being reliant on education; it therefore advisable for the employers to ensure education for the students such as those pursuing nursing which involves a lot of practical ought to be paid for. Argument in this cases is that university sector ought be reduced and made available for minimum percentage of the society. The article also outlines clearly that the current kind of learning system is way too expensive. The state is highly relying on international scholars in confirming the satisfaction of ever increasing education needs. As seen in the article, incomprehensible intersections in programs provision through the existing thirty seven state and two private universities or colleges in Sydney demands their reduction. The training can only be relevant if specific programs are brought back to commerce and industry sector. According to the article, returning of such programs ensures courses oversupply does not exist and expenses are not left to individuals. A move taken to ensure quality education calls for reduction in the number of universities providing same programs and are situated within a geographical area. The conclusion of this argument is that only a single university should exist in Sydney but should have various branches. The claim of education reservation of five (5) percent of the whole population existing in Australia is providing wrong impression. This is because there is no correlation between the number of people accessing education and the quality of education being provided. Quality of education highly depends on the kind of education system in place that is capable of providing the required kind of education. The most crucial thing in guaranteeing quality education is ensure the lecturing staff are highly qualified, availability of learning materials, good learning system, and the appropriate curriculum. Countless people may obtain university/college teaching without any conciliation to its excellence only if education stakeholders’ team take part in the process of presenting the arrangements for its establishment. Let say only the leading 5% of the entire society are provided with an opportunity to access higher learning in Australia as suggested in the claim. The question is, will this move guarantee quality of education and therefore ensure the Australian education system is the most envied on the globe?. I totally not conquer with this suggestion as the number of individuals does not play any role in terms of education quality. If the university education is supported by well-structured education system and resources then countless number of individuals can have same access to quality education. The quality of education is only noticeable when more than enough learning resources are made available for the sake of learners. The suggestion that the number of learning institutions, specifically universities, should be reduced in order to increase the quality of education, is another misleading argument. The number of universities and the quality of education are 2 very dissimilar elements. The position being argued by the author here is that, if the number of universities within a geographical area is reduced the quality of education will rise. There is no way quality of education is reduced by the number of universities within a given geographical area so does the similar courses they provide. The truth is, Sydney has a very large population hence more than one university is required. The argument that there’s a single university with many branches does not seem to work as it does not provide enough information. Another misleading suggestion said to have ruined the quality of education is provision of programs in the university such as nursing, optometry, management and accounting. Even if we assume that some universities in Sydney does not provide a standardized education, it is overpowered by the number of institutions providing quality higher learning programs. The debater in this article only seems to be right by disagreeing with provision of courses that require a lot of practical in the university, for example, nursing. In the article, the fact that the federal administration has to provide 10,000 USD to every learner is a point well presented as education system in Australia has become quite expensive. International students in Australia are actually the main pillars why the present Australian education system is still maintainable but it does not in any way relate to the argument that the Australian capital should have one and only university. Even if the move to reduce the number of population accessing higher education is taken, it does not help in making the education more accessible; in fact the education will be more expensive reason being economies of scale. The only valid way and possible option is to restore other available methods of getting trainings and education. Returning such programs to the appropriate industry is what will actually reduce the number of universities existing in Sydney and the cost of education. References Athanasou J 2014, Why higher education needs to be more like BMW than Ford, accessed 24 May 2014, http://www.smh.com.au/comment/why-higher-education-needs-to-be-more-like-bmw-than-ford-20140427-zr0cw.html Read More