Study Skills for Professionals - Essay Example

Study Skills for Professionals: Assessment 3 By: Lecturer: Study Skills for Professionals: Assessment 3 An as Koopman (1997) explained should be a concise description of the work in questions that gives the reader an overview of the entire text. The problem statement in question has been well, outlined in the abstract of the paper, where the writer explains the limitations of existing computing frameworks and presents a method to solve the limitations in the research. The writer also summarizes the proposed model to be constructed thereby enabling the reader to effectively figure out the essence of the paper. The abstract although short has therefore summarized the entire text as required. Evaluation of the PROMPT Criteria The PROMPT criterion stands for: presentation, relevance, objectivity, method, provenance and timelines. These are the important requirements that a well presented paper should meet in any discipline. The paper on challenges for ubiquitous computing, to a large extent meets the requirements in the PROMPT criteria. The presentation of the paper has been effectively designed where the paper begins with the basics of Ubiquitous computing in the introduction which would enable a lay audience to effectively read and understand the concept of the paper. The objectivity of the paper provides a professional view of the subject by including authoritative references that support the research and has enabled the formation of an ethical and logical appeal to the audience as explained by Lester (2008: 89). The use of scientific research methods has enabled the writer to form cohesive knowledge throughout the paper, and the audience would appropriately make out on this knowledge. Scientific knowledge as Ruane (2005:32) explained involves hypothesis and inclusion of statistical data to from an informative paper as can be observed in the report. The complex event processing (CEP) as Murakami et al (2005: 131) noted is a topic that has found much importance and use today and this affirms the relevance of the paper in question. The timeline and provenance have therefore been accurately fallowed by the writer and makes the PROMPT criteria in research to be well covered in the paper. Evaluation of existing body of knowledge This section enables the writer to explore similar work that has been carried out in the area of research. The importance of this section as Ruane (2005:32) explained would be to create a valid knowledge through the use of scientific research methods. In all the literature explored by the writer, the importance of ubiquitous computing and its contribution to computer usage today is evident. At the end of the literature review, the writer concludes the exploration of the literature by explaining the interaction of the explained research in the preceding papers and the Complex Event Processing (CEP), which form the base of the research in the paper. The literature review as expected has been used by the writer to offer the direction that the paper would (University of South Wales, 2009) take in order to form new knowledge as explained above and avoid duplications in research. The paper could therefore be observed as an improvement of previous research in the same field of ubiquitous framework. The importance of the literature review as Murchison (2010) explained is to enable the leader to conceptualize and form a broader knowledge base that improves the understanding of the question at hand. The writer has provided several background reviews from the previous papers and has linked all the reviews in the research to form the objective of the research. Some of the reviews have been very short and with fewer details to support the research but as Murchison (2010) explained, the size of the research paper might determine the size of the reviews, although each review has to be relevant to the research. Discussion The discussion of the writer after making the model has been presented in well outlined and designed criteria. To explain the working of the constructed model ,the writer uses questions in describing the operations of the model to the user. Questions according to Lester (2008:91) might be very effective in allowing the reader to from an inquiry on the research, thereby raising the level of anxiety to discover the effective answers. This approach might therefore be considered as very appropriate. Referencing system The citation used in the report (IEEE) is convenient and clear to use. Its suitability in a short paper as the one provided eliminates bulkiness and creates neatness in the text unlike other citations which require too many details in the text. For instance, by referencing [1] instead of Weiser (1993), it creates neatness and reduces the size of the text by eliminating a lot of details in the text. Such a short paper characteristic of similar scientific papers becomes shorter by eliminating too many details. Readability The paper has been structured to offer optimum readability and flow. As Mcnabb (2007:399) explained, a research paper should be structured so as to offer consistency that allows flow of ideas throughout the paper. The paper in question has been well structured and the simplicity in language makes the report easy to understand while at the same time maintaining the professionalism in the discipline. The sections have been well arranged from the abstract, introduction, outlining the essentials in computing to formation of the research model. These would enable the reader to navigate consistently while gaining knowledge on the issue of the actual model in question. The build up of ideas makes the readability and the structure of the paper well organized. Conclusion The presentation of the paper has been well designed to offer optimum readability. From the paper summary in the abstract that states the purpose of the research, to the introduction that lays the basics of the study, the paper presents well organized thoughts. The details of computing and Complex Event Processing have been presented in details, and offer a better understanding to computing in simple language that could be understood by a lay person. The paper then lays the basis of research trough literature review, in which similar studies have been carried out. This allowed the writer to form the basis of the model by integrating all the studies and build on the analysis to improve CEP. In all this, the paper has been well structured and organized and the reference used ensures clarity and simplicity of the text. References Koopman, P., 1997. How to write an abstract. [Carnegie Mellon University] available at [Accessed 14th Dec. 2010] Lester,D. J., 2005. Research paper handbook: your complete guide. Tucson: Good Year Books Mcnabb, D.E., 2008. Research methods in public administration and NONP: Qualitative and qualitative approaches. NY: M.E. Sharp Inc. Murakami, H.et al 2005. Ubiquitous computing systems: second International symposium, UCS 2004 Tokyo, Japan. Berlin: Springer-Varlag Berlin Heidelberg. Ruane, M. J., 2005. Essentials of research methods: a guide to social research. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing University of New South Wales, 2009. Getting started on your literature review A General Guide for Postgraduate Research Students [UNSW Learning Center] available at [Accessed 14th Dec. 2010] Read More