StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper describes co-planning as an important part of co-teaching inside the classroom. However, this necessitates the general education teacher and the special education teacher to come into an agreement by discussing classroom rules, class format, class structure and the consequences for students who break the rules…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students"

 Co-teaching is a popular teaching technique or strategy made especially for special education students. Normally, this form of classroom instruction consists of having a general education teacher and a special education teacher in one classroom setting (Forsyth 2009). Moreover, co-teaching is a process which entails shared responsibility between the two teachers where the special education teacher provides lessons of specialized nature for students with special requirements or needs; so they can learn competently along with the other students in the shared classroom (Forsyth 2009). In relation to the foregoing, co-planning is an important part of co-teaching inside the classroom. However, this necessitates the general education teacher and the special education teacher to come into an agreement by discussing classroom rules, class format, class structure and the consequences for students who break the rules. Additionally, both teachers should also be of the same mind as to what co-teaching style they will utilize and employ. By taking the time out to do the standard processes, both teachers will be able to curtail any unforeseen negative circumstances within the classroom as they go through the customary practice of imparting and instilling necessary education to their students. In order to impart lessons effectively, both highly trained and skillful teachers must learn how to synchronize their respective work or duties inside the classroom as they convey educational contents, so they would be able to achieve a common ultimate goal. Such process will initially require the elements of unbiased cooperation, positive interdependence, individual accountability, meting out of interpersonal skills and appraisal of performance. Having unbiased cooperation in co-teaching means no hidden agenda in making various vital decisions with regards to different factors of co-teaching and co-planning, which generally demand personal meetings to thresh out vital details. Positive interdependence is a realization that both teachers are quite diverse in skill, knowledge and resources but must cooperate and work hand-in-hand to attain a common objective. On the other hand, individual accountability involves doing the necessary assessment with regards the achievements and contributions of both teachers in co-teaching making them aware of their progress. Finally, meting out of interpersonal skills leads to appraisal of performance because the former calls for feedback on each teacher’s work output, which must ultimately be followed by encouragement to improve current skills. When all the preceding five elements are done correctly, each or both members of the co-teaching force will be able to develop a shared belief system that does not only mean teaching efficiently, but also having the students learn effectively – which is a more crucial goal for both teachers (Cushman 2004). Primarily, co-teaching calls for adequate time to plan together, as this cannot be accomplished overnight. Hence both teachers must go out of their way to meet and prepare. Aspects like content knowledge along with trust and respect are naturally built overtime and are vital to the successful outcome of the co-teaching system. Both the general education teacher and the special education teacher must be familiar with the various co teaching models aside from the elements of co-teaching that was previously mentioned. The five co-teachings models are: 1) lead and support; 2) station teaching; 3) parallel teaching; 4) alternative teaching; and 5) team teaching (Special Connections 2005). The lead and support model is a co-teaching technique where one teacher leads and the other teacher provides assistance. While planning is normally done by both teachers, the other teacher usually makes the plans for lesson content; and the other teacher works on detailed planning for behavioral needs and individual learning of the students. The next co-teaching model is the station teaching where the students are segregated into heterogeneous or mixed groups. These groups of students are then required to work at classroom stations with each teacher. The next day students will switch or transfer to the other station previously occupied by the other group, and so both teachers are able to build up their respective stations’ educational content individually. The third type of co-teaching model is the parallel teaching method. This particular kind of co-teaching technique requires shared planning time from both teachers to make sure that content delivery is done in the same way to each separate group in the classroom. Alternative teaching on the other hand is done by both teachers who must alternately pre-teach and re-teach; and supplements a small group of students. This type of co-teaching model require more planning time to make certain that the handling of the practical details of instruction undertaking can actually be accomplished. Both teachers are required to have similar content knowledge of the lessons to be conveyed, so either can do the work of pre-teaching and reteaching a group of students. Last but not the least is team teaching. This type of co-teaching model requires sharing in the planning and instruction of all educational contents for good coordination. Both the special education teacher and the general education teacher must actively participate if they wish to implement this system, in order to have equal knowledge of the content to be taught. With this knowledge, they must likewise have a shared commitment and viewpoint relative to the handling of the students in the class. This co-teaching model is regarded as quite different from the rest of the other co-teaching models because it requires a longer time for both teachers to make it work efficiently in their favor. Most co-teaching teams usually are able to team teach harmoniously after they have worked for a couple of years together because they are able to complement each other’s work. And while most co-teaching teams do not start out with this type of co-teaching model initially, they normally shift to this one after some time (Special Connections 2005). Contemplatively, co-teaching allows special students to gain maximum benefit in their education. This does not however mean that the regular students in class are benefited less since they are likewise included in the detailed planning of the lessons. Co-teaching is a special scheme of learning instruction which gives every student in the class a chance to learn more with the help of both teachers. Teaching special students with special needs is not entirely different from giving out educational instructions to regular students. The main difference on the whole lies in the details on how those students with special needs are precisely approached – meaning taking into consideration the special student’s ability to receive instruction and bring forth an expected outcome. While said students are not expected to outperform their regular counterparts, most of the activities done in class are in mixed groups; and this gives every student in the classroom an opportunity to work and bring out the best in each other. For the benefit of all the students, both the general education teacher and the special education teacher must always have an open communication with each other. They should not see each other as individual teachers with self-made interest inside the classroom but must see themselves as a pair who must function as one. In this regard both teachers must be open and should learn to accept constructive criticisms, which must be perceived as a want or need for further improvement in their craft. By constantly evaluating weaknesses and strengths, and accepting criticisms for improvement, co-teaching is considered to be a very effective tool in dispensing classroom education (Wagaman 2008). Reference Page Cushman, Susan. (2004). What is Co-Teaching? A Guide to Co-Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/6847_villa_ch_1.pdf Forsyth, S. (2009). Co-Teaching and Different Styles of Co-Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.brighthub.com/education/special/articles/4096.aspx Special Connections. (2005). What are the five types of co-teaching? Retrieved from http://www.specialconnections.ku.edu/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/specconn/main.php?cat=collaboration§ion=main&subsection=coteachin g/types Wagaman, Jennifer. (2008). Co-Teaching Strategies for Special Needs Student, Teachers Working Together for Student Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.suite101.com/content/coteaching-for-success-a73195 McDonald, C., & Chenoweth, L. (2009). Leadership: A crucial ingredient in unstable times. Social Work & Society, 7. Retrieved from http://www.socwork.net/2009/1/articles/mcdonaldchenoweth Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students Research Paper”, n.d.)
Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1745094-co-planning-co-teaching
(Co-Teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students Research Paper)
Co-Teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/education/1745094-co-planning-co-teaching.
“Co-Teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/education/1745094-co-planning-co-teaching.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Co-teaching: Technique or Strategy for Special Education Students

Impact of Instructional Coaching on Students

hellip; Impact of Instructional Coaching on students.... The thesis represents the comprehensive analysis regarding the subject matter of impact of instructional coaching on students' achievements.... The findings of various themes under discourse are also a crucial part that has come under integration that would enlighten how the evaluation methods can help assess the impact of instructional coaching on students and their performances.... As everyone comes under acquaintance with the advancements that the world has encountered until the twenty first century, this has brought constructive alterations, developments, growth, and expansions in all fields that even include the education and learning practice and curriculums for the students....
30 Pages (7500 words) Thesis

Peculiarities of Brain-Based Learning

By learning how the brain functions, teachers will be able to maximize the students' ability to learn.... Eventually, this report strong suggest that need to incorporate the concept of student-centric”, “formative assessment”, and “experiential learning” when assessing the students' performance in a brain-based learning within the online learning environment....
23 Pages (5750 words) Research Paper

Teacher Evaluation and Monitoring of Students Performance with Special Needs

How does an inclusive general education and special education teacher evaluate instruction and monitor progress of students with special needs?... Delisle et al put inclusive education as, “inclusion would mean that students with special learning or behavioral needs would spend their days in regular classroom, accompanied by a special education teacher or an aide who would assist them in acclimatizing to their setting” (Delisle et al.... All these have to enable a clear cut strategy for the evaluation and monitoring of students with special needs in the classroom....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Special Education Comprehensive Essay Exam

In general, it is defined as the inclusion of students with disabilities into general education classrooms.... A positive and supportive school philosophy towards inclusion and students with disabilities is crucial for a successful inclusion program (Baird, 1990; Emerson & Maddox, 1997; Salisbury et al.... A positive classroom climate is one that is accepting of individual differences and promotes the idea that all students, including students with disabilities, should have the same access to knowledge, growth, achievement, success and belonging (Webber)....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Teaching Math in Learning Disorder and Behavioral Disorders Classroom

The task of improving students' achievement in mathematics was clearly determined as one of the national priorities in the field of education (Goals 2000: Educate America Act).... hellip; This perception remains dominant these days with increasing numbers of educational institutions including additional math assessments students have to pass to graduate. ... ecently collected statistical data demonstrates that up to 20 percent of American students have some type of learning impairment though the actual figure is likely to be much higher if consider an unknown population of students with learning disorders whom have never been officially undiagnosed (LDA-CA, 2003)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Affordances of an Educational Technology Tool (Blogs)

hellip; According to the report Affordances of an Educational Technology Tool (Blogs) ICT tasks, resources, and support are created to produce interactive and integrative multimedia contexts or learning environments for both teachers and students.... Developmental and cognitive elaborations (from teachers and students) provide the opportunities and affordances of learning resources and support, i....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

My Strengths as an Educator

The goal of the survey and study was to evaluate the impact of the learning approach that I had developed and used on the students.... The data collected was in the… The students were given the freedom to answer the questions in a way that reflected their personal learning experience based upon their perceived positive and negative aspects of the teaching method. The questions posed were aimed at helping the All the students were given one week to complete the survey and yet, even with repeated and daily reminders, only 86% of the students managed to turn in their completed survey forms within the alloted time frame....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

General Education Teachers Preparedness to Teach Special Education Students

This essay declares that effective educators require both special education and general education training.... Currently, training programs emphasize on general, mainstream and special education teachers.... This means that these teachers must be properly educated in their fields on how to work collaboratively and provide an effective learning platform or environment for their students.... Teachers need to be accountable during their interactions with special needs students....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us