Critical Thinking Course in Academics - Essay Example

The critical thinking course is a crucial component of the curriculum and student development. The course curriculum enhances cognitive values and nurtures skills in decision-making. The course equips and enriches interpersonal skills and conflict resolution aids. Therefore, a critical thinking course facilitates proper training on the importance of rational behavior in the pursuit of sustainable global development. Significance of critical thinking in argumentsThe critical thinking course sets apart people's future professionalism.

Notably, the course advanced students the knowledge to embrace diversity and challenges. Besides, the benefits of critical thinking course evidence in people's analytical skills, nature of argument presentations, and judiciousness in attempting academic puzzles. The clear understanding of barriers to communication and critical thinking further stamps the significance of the course to the school life. In regards to dealing with arguments, the course provided a precise analysis of the types of cases.

Critical thinking enhances the analysis of reasons, application of standards, and the making of conclusive decisions based on sound reasoning and premises. Q2. Good arguments and bad argumentsArguments are good or bad depending on the context, premises of thoughts, and applied strategies. They include statements by individuals on a given topic or issue of debate. Good arguments comprise of inductive and deductive arguments. Good deductive arguments provide the basis for truth in conclusions while good inductive arguments guarantee probable suppositions (Nukui, 2007).

A bad argument refers to the fallacious or misleading arguments. The type of case usually facilitates persuasive conclusions through the illicit procedure of argumentation. Accordingly, bad arguments are of three types namely arguments destabilized by irrelevance, arguments based on unsure premises, and arguments that encompass hurried conclusions. Challenges when constructing argumentsBased on the features above, persons make simple yet noticeable mistakes when constructing arguments. For example, the failure to identify the validity of the arguments or strength entails the typical challenges when constructing arguments.

In addition, people fail to establish the premises to back the arguments thus making the simple errors and giving grounds for misunderstandings. Challenges when countering argumentsSimilarly, persons have trouble when countering arguments. The problems mainly stem from several personal attributes, for instance, own beliefs, and stereotype thinking about an individual or issue (Nukui, 2007). Challenges also arise from people’s inability to identify flaws in arguments. Hence, instead of concentrating on issues of concern, they attack speakers, leading to misinterpretation of information and tautology.

False correlation of problem and poor judgment also approaches lead to the challenges. How to improve argumentative skills In order to develop the skills, individuals pay attention to little instructions, establish the premises of arguments, and apply rational skills in decision-making. Most importantly, constructing or countering an argument is a logical process based on evidence, in-depth knowledge, and sound thinking.