Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1599699-role-reflection
https://studentshare.org/education/1599699-role-reflection.
Money is invested in designing the right curriculum but proper measures are not taken to implement it.
The article also argues that there is no relationship between curriculum development and implementation. The article also stresses the fact that more attention should be paid to the implementation of curriculum and it should be considered as important as curriculum development. Another problem that is identified in the article is related to the difference between the designed curriculum and the curriculum that is followed. There are also massive communication issues that hinder the implementation of the desired curriculum.
It is argued in the article that the use of appropriate tools can help in better implementation of curriculum. The use of a curriculum implementation monitoring system is advised by the article and it is suggested that this new system can help schools better implement their desired curriculum. The suggested system is expensive and does not put significant stress on the school teachers and administration. The new system focuses more on communication to ensure that there is a match between the desired curriculum and the curriculum that is followed. Communication will help schools remove the problems teachers face in the implementation of the curriculum.
The role of the principal is identified as the greatest in solving the problem of implementation of the curriculum. The article argues that the use of the new system will only help solve the problem if principals take an interest and ensure that the new system is followed. Principals are also advised to do regular follow-ups with teachers to make sure that everything is running smoothly. A proper working relationship between teachers and principals can play a huge role in making sure that teachers can follow and implement the designed curriculum. the leadership of the principal is vital, according to the article, to remove all hindrances in the implementation of the desired curriculum.
The article is written in an academic tone and identifies a significant problem in schools. The author has used research evidence to communicate to the audience that the discussed issue is a real one that needs attention. The article also suggests a new system that can solve the problem schools are facing regarding the implementation of the curriculum. The suggested system is discussed at length and a proper framework is presented as to how schools can adopt this system. The role of the principal in the new system is also discussed at length.
There are some weaknesses in the article too. The author has not used empirical evidence sufficiently. A new system is suggested but no evidence is presented that can increase the credibility of the suggested system. The article does also not explain the limitations of the system and the cost structure of the system is also not given. The lack of empirical evidence and research has made the article nothing more than a suggestion from the author that may or may not be credible in nature.