As the discussion highlights a misconception is that learners who learn online do not interact with others. While they may not do it on a personal level, they do it through online correspondence like blogs and e-mails. Interaction is a vital process of learning, as everyone needs to seek the opinion of other students on the subject course. Online learning produces academically strong students with personal relation skills based on correspondence. In a traditional setting, the spirit of research is absent as students rely on recitation of one tutor to provide learning. When crowd of scholars are together in most cases, it leads to mob behavior where students misbehave. To quell them, sometimes administrators use physical reprimand, which might at times serve to discourage students learning.From this paper it is clear that technology must serve the subject matter, not the other way round. In this, it means that the online course must be set in such a way that it fulfills the demands of the students without much hustle. Learning materials available online at times have no limit and advance to levels beyond what students may require sometimes. This call for alteration of learning materials available online to suits the demand of learners. Traditional students use books, set syllabus, and so need not worry about an encounter of any materials out of their curriculum. This makes progressive learning in the tradition setting easier compared to online learning. Traditional method is criticized
for supporting teaching and not learning. It is mostly centered on the tutor instead of the student.
Performance in a traditional setting has also constantly come under sharp criticism. Students that fail to appear for exams and fail to hand in their work fail. Their failing does not prove that they did not know. Some students may pass and hand in their assignment, yet they do not understand what they are submitting. Rank or a few numbers in the form of marks determine student results. In an online setting, however, students get a detailed feedback from teachers based on evaluation of the students work. Comparison of students in different levels to award rank is impossible as each student learns based on his own program and time. Online students learn motivated by a certain purpose while the traditional setting is progressive based. Students learn to later specialize at an advanced level. General learning critics think it is a waste of time and education should be based on a reason (Dray et al, 2011).
These both systems require student responsibility. Students in online learning have to schedule themselves but have a more flexible system as they can access their classes anytime. Responsibility is only needed in ensuring that they do attend the class as they determine when they have to. In a traditional se