Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/education/1395239-the-rights-of-children-with-respect-to-education-and-health
https://studentshare.org/education/1395239-the-rights-of-children-with-respect-to-education-and-health.
This issue has the potential for controversy, as a reference to "religion" has the potential to encompass a wide range of subject matters in the social and physical sciences. Potential disagreements are predicted in terms of natural history, such as lessons concerning dinosaurs and evolutionary theory. Even matters purely in the purview of recorded human history could provoke contention, such as descriptions of the Crusades, or the Holocaust, or possibly any form of comparative religious study.
(Dickerson, 2009 A) Sources in the government describe the purpose of these amendments as a clarification of the Alberta human rights and citizenship commission responsibilities. This is seen as a necessity in order to streamline the process by which rights appeals are efficiently addressed as they arise. This is accomplished through the separation human rights commission's current role as an investigative body, as well as the deliberative organization that mediates and the judges complaints.
Separating these two functions should improve the efficiency of your product functions relating to the resolution of human rights allegations. A funding increase also assisted the commission in the execution of these duties.ntial to address additional complexities in complaint resolution likely to stem from these measures. The government's ability to address issues of free speech has not been abridged. The commission retains unlimited power to issue judgments on matters pertaining expression.
This has important implications regarding the potential for censorship of written material. This is contrary to predictions by government insiders, but considerable deliberation occurred in regards to the consequences of any removal of the term "publications". (Government of Alberta, 2009 C), (Dickerson, 2009 A) free speech advocates were disappointed by the measure, who had submitted policy recommendations in favor of the removal of measures which they felt represented limitations upon free expression in Alberta.
(Fekete, 2009) Supporters anticipate few arguments as a result of these measures. While parents theoretically have the freedom to remove their children from these classes that might cover sensitive subjects, the number of parents that execute that power are limited. However, additional scrutiny is warranted according to opposition parties within the government, who are likely to subject parental opt-out clauses to closer examination within legislative deliberations. (Audette, 2009.), (Dickerson, 2009 A) The available information describing the concerns of government officials and free speech advocates shape their concern without regard to the child's opinion.
Understandable, and arguably normal - as it is the parents
...Download file to see next pages Read More