Part 1 It is generally assumed that there are four proposed future scenarios for the United States. These include: 1. Future 1: Lead the World to Democracy, 2. Future 2: Protect U.S. Global Interests, 3. Future 3: Build a More Cooperative World, 4. Future 4: Protect the U.S…
Download file to see previous pages...
With the current state of international instability, the United States is more likely to venture successfully in protecting its global interests both in economic and political benefits. Discussion The approach of protecting the United States global interest is more likely to succeed in the future given the Americans strong believe that their country should take the leadership position in the world. Even though this does not necessarily mean that the United States should take the watchdog role over the world, the support and conviction of American citizens is likely to create an internationally active united states that is capable of effectively pursuing its global interests. Additionally, scenarios taking place in other nations and in fact the whole world are cable of affecting the United States and indeed the interests of its citizens. This approach is more appreciated now more than ever especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks (Bartholomees, 2006). In addition, it is quite evident that the United States prefers multilateralism rather than unilateralism. To Hough, (2008), Americans have a strong conviction that it is more effective and certainly better to boost cooperation with other nations of the world in an effort to realize the nations’ (US) interest than it could be to work against these nations the rationale behind these approach is that it is more cost effective considering that the united states partners in the globe can willingly share the burden. Thus whilst the invasion of Iraq drummed overwhelming support from the American citizens, their willingness to bear the burden of rebuilding that nation is unclear and this necessitated the assistance of other states. Generally, the United States is known to support the promotion of other nations market based economy or capitalism, free trade and democracy. This is a clear indication that America is more likely to succeed in future through this approach even though as a matter of fact, other values may be prioritized in certain instances, and even though these values may generally serve the united states global interest, the united states national interest takes priority. Consequently, these values perused by the United States are the core values and embracing of these values by other nations is perceived as a positive development. These make the protection of US global interest approach more likely to succeed in future. Furthermore, with the Americans believe that confrontation of international terrorism ought to be prioritized; the country’s global interest is more likely gain momentum if future as more nations in the world are coming up in support of this policy. Conclusion Indeed, even though there are generally four assumed future scenarios for the United States protection of the United States among these four assumed futures is more likely to succeed in future. This approach is supported by Americans strong believe that their country should take the leadership position in the world, the country’s preference of multilateralism rather than unilateralism, and Americans believe that confrontation of international terrorism ought to be prioritized. Part 2 Question 2 of 4. Assess what type of structural constraints - if any - the US Congress imposes upon the presidency in general and
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“American Foreign Policy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/e-commerce/1394176-american-foreign-policy
(American Foreign Policy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“American Foreign Policy Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/e-commerce/1394176-american-foreign-policy.
Most people believe that if a certain degree of violation has been perpetrated, and intervention has a potential to initiate adequately useful changes, it is acceptable. Problems arise when we attempt to evaluate what extent, or kind, of transgressions and what extent, and type, of possible useful changes are adequate to validate humanitarian intervention (Wheeler 2002).
The U.S. do not really gave independence to the Cubans from the Spaniards that time. Instead, Cuba became a new territory of U.S. by the very systematic manner of annexation. Also, the Cubans might not agree with Wood’s notion of U.S. as a “their faithful friend” for it has a different agenda behind its actions towards Cuba.
A joint operation organized by a coalition of the United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Canada, Qater, Belgium, Denmark, and Norway assumed the responsibility of implementing the no-fly zone restriction authorized by the United Nations Security Council.
One of the central tenets of this policy was to move resources away from military advancement, which seemed less urgent after the fall of the Soviet Union, and towards economic development. This shift changed the fundamental interests of American foreign policy considerations away from militarization and towards world-wide economic cohesion.
The progressive era from 1890 to 1920 can be argued as the golden period when the economical growth and social development were at their highest level. Much considerable advancement in the areas of politics, society, and culture can be identified under this timeframe.
The efforts taken by the United States in achieving its national objectives and power is often determined in its foreign policy. There had been considerable changes since 1877 as far as American foreign policies are concerned, as it reoriented its focus regarding its national security, defense and expansion of its economy.
However, since the Second World War, United States of America emerged as a super power alongside Soviet Union. These two powers developed cold relations, which have led to implementation of several social, economic, political, and foreign policies. This paper traces these policies since Second World War to the era of George Bush and how they helped to shape relations of America with other countries.
Some of the Al Qaeda elements involved in this global affair are absconders and demanded for prosecution by United States of America, hence this falls in conflict with the core cause of ousted of Bashar AL Asad and American security internally. In the wake of such tangled scenario, it is being echoed whether the existence and stay of Bashar Al Asad goes in the favor of President Obama administration and the vested interest of United States of America.