The purpose of this paper "Deontological Ethical Theory" is to outline the cornerstones of the deontological ethical view. Moreover, the writer of the essay will analyze the theory, critiquing its approach and discussing strong sides as well as its possible weaknesses…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The deontological ethical theory has its own weakness. For example, t makes room for using logical reasoning in determining what is right (Hoy, 2005). Once this is done, interpretation of the rules becomes a very difficult thing to do since everyone has their own discretion within which the rules are explained. In such a situation, it becomes very difficult to have a single modality under which ethics are applied.Consequentiality is another ethical view point that can be applied in the use of technology. In the premise of this ethical theory, there is the need to strive to increase utility. The strength with this is that the greater good of most people is sought instead of the subjective needs of a few people. This way, ethics are enforced because workers are made to look for the interest of other external stakeholders.What this theory lacks however is the fact that it fails to set the parameter as to who should be responsible for evaluating the consequences that affected people suffer. As a result, even though there is quest to satisfy people’s needs and values, the willpower to do this can be missing. Within the modern technological society, deontology can be said to hold more easily than consequentiality. This is because companies seem less concerned about the consequences of their actions on the public. Rather, they only focus on their profits. It is not surprising that global warming continues to be alarming as the number of technological companies continues to increase.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
According to the theories, the people who stick to their duties are behaving morally. Those who do not follow their duties are behaving immorally. God determines all these rules and duties. Therefore, people who
A lot of arguments either in favor or against the practice have been presented. Evaluating these arguments using the utilitarian theory will provide a better understanding of the issue while resolving the
have in the past appreciated philosophy because it employs a critical and systematic approach, thereby tackling reality, reasoning, existence, knowledge, and values Philosophy is wide and broad and it is for this reason that people normally find it challenging to make sense out
The author claims that the virtue of being honest emphasizes on the character of doing what is right and just. It further eliminates vices and ensures that person’s acts are always good. There are three major types of virtue ethics that distinguishes it from utilitarianism and deontological include; actual wisdom and virtue.
In other words, only those actions that conform to the categorical imperative are considered to be good. If a person helps a patient placed in home-based care to inject some medicine on themselves and by mistake, the helper overdoses the patient leading to their death, the helper should not be punished.
Immanuel Kant has earned the distinction in history of being the last major philosopher of the Enlightenment. His work captures the signature trademark of the Age of Enlightenment – a firm and deeply-entrenched belief in reason – but at the same time, he refused to be shackled by the strictures of his time.
His findings provide a wide spectrum of implications in order to establish the frameworks of Absolute Empiricism,Absolute Rationalism and Absolute Idealism.In the realm of any ethical theory,there are some standpoints that can be taken,so an ethical system could be Deontological,Teleological,Consequentialist,Relativism/Subjectivism,and Virtue Based Theories.
One of the most important implications of deontology is that praiseworthy goals can never justify immoral actions, in contrast to doctrines that claim the ends justify the means. Deontology is directly in opposition to consequentially, an ethical theory in which the ends can justify the means because decisions are judged primarily in terms of their consequences.