The British Empiricists and Kant's Ethics - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The reporter states that for Spinoza, everything endeavors to preserve its own being, that is to say, it has a conatus, which is an active power or force towards self-preservation. In this sense, the essence of the human body is its conatus, which manifests itself as desires, which are directed towards pleasure and the avoidance of pain…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful
The British Empiricists and Kants Ethics
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The British Empiricists and Kant's Ethics"

A: What do you think of Spinoza's active and passive emotions?
For Spinoza, everything endeavors to preserve its own being, that is to say, it has a conatus, which is an active power or force towards self-preservation. In this sense, the essence of the human body is its conatus, which manifests itself as desires, which are directed towards pleasure and the avoidance of pain. In the light of emotions, Spinoza introduces human passions. A “passion” is an emotion that decreases the active power of the body; it is passive. Given that all our desires follow from our active nature; which is good, how do such passive emotions arise? First, because of the theory of conatus, painful things happen to us because of external and not internal causes. And second, passive emotional states or passions, arise only from inadequate ideas – anger, fear, hatred, occur because of ignorance or incomplete understanding of their external causes. Therefore, in so far as we have an adequate idea of our emotions and their causes, we will not be subject to passions.
B: What is interesting to you about the British Empiricists?
The British empiricists all believe that knowledge is derived from experience alone. This aspect of arriving at knowledge seem quite interesting from the point of view of Locke, Berkley, and Hume. For Locke, our mind is a blank and clean slate, which he calls “tabularasa.” Thus, all ideas and knowledge can only come to us and are founded upon experience alone. On the other hand, for Berkeley, all that we ever know are the qualities of an object that our faculty of vision is capable of sensing. Hence, it implies that any given object is the summation of its perceived qualities. Lastly, Hume sets out to achieve the limits of our knowledge. Herein, as far as knowledge is concerned, we are limited to our impressions and their corresponding ideas, which manifest in constant conjunction through experience. We have no way of knowing what causes them. For Hume, if an idea has no corresponding impression, then it is meaningless, that is, it does not exist.
C. What do you think of Kant's ethics?
Kant’s ethics distinguishes between “acting in accordance to duty” and “acting for the sake of duty.” The latter are actions that have moral worth, while the former has no moral worth. Moreover, Kant explains another way of determining whether an action is morally good or not. This is presented in The Categorical Imperative. This principle states that before I will a certain mode of conduct, I should see to it that my subjective course of action could be universalized as a moral legislation. If my desired act involves certain contradictions, then my act cannot qualify as a moral law and must be rejected. However, if it is devoid of contradictions then, it can be morally acceptable. Given this, I believe that his ethics is necessarily linked to human freedom. For, freedom should be understood as accorded with the dictates of human reason. So whether the law works in your favor or not, you must follow through with the respect for law. And this to Kant is “good in itself”. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The British Empiricists and Kant's Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The British Empiricists and Kant'S Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“The British Empiricists and Kant'S Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The British Empiricists and Kant's Ethics

Ethics (David Hume and Kant)

...? Kant stands for moral principles and human rationality above human emotional responses while Hume theorizes that what we need is a “livable ethics”which is honest to human feelings rather than bases itself on some abstract moral principle which has no connection to human nature (Kant, Hume). But what Kant professes is a secular and universal kind of morality while Hume's argument is highly subjective and could be very problematic in its applications. Hume has observed that it is our modern philosophers who define morality on pure reason and in contrast to that our ancient thinkers have considered “morals as deriving their existence from taste and sentiment” (2). Hume...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


...Lecturer’s According to Kant, human beings and all other creatures that are rational tend to not only have ends but also have intrinsic value. Because of this, he states that it is not moral for human beings to use each other as means for their own ends. Kant further states that the principle of humanity and any creature that is rational as an end in itself are not borrowed from experience, moreover it is clear that all those rational beings are members of a universal kingdom of ends. In addition, these laws are not only made by these beings, but these beings are also subject to the laws, which have been made. Every rational or human nature is based on the autonomy of the beings, which is practiced by...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Kant's Ethics

...KANTIAN ETHICS The most notable of Immanuel Kant's works revolved around ethics and knowledge. He differed from previous philosophers in his approach to as opposed to existing views of the rationalists and empiricists developed his own model to explain the theory of knowledge viz., deontological ethics. The empiricists were philosophers who believed that knowledge arises from experience. The rationalists believed that knowledge arises from reason. So a person's action under any situation is borne out of his previous experiences or out of his sense of reasoning. But Kant postulated that a person's ethics,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Ethics of Dignity and Freedom by Kant

...Ethics of Dignity and Freedom Kant is a famous philosopher who made a great contribution into the development of philosophy in general and of ethics, as a branch of philosophy. His unique ethical theory is even more remarkable than his works in epistemology and metaphysic. Mostly Kant’s ethical theory is represented in his works: The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), The Critique of Practical Reason (1787). Kant was the first philosopher who proposed the notion of deontological ethics, which is the study of duty. The most important Kant’s criticism of previous...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


... and Number of the Teacher’s Modern Political Theory HEGEL AND MARX Introduction The works of the Prussian philosopher G.W. Hegel (1770-1831) and the German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883) present views of philosophy, history, and political society that contrast with the British empirical tradition. The ideas developed by Hegel and Marx present a new method for studying politics that challenged many of the assumptions from the philosophers of the early modern period. Thesis Statement: The purpose of this paper is to address the ideas and methods of Hegel and Marx associated with German Idealism. Discussion Hegel and Marx: The Study of Politics and Economics; Dialectical Materialism Marx was the first person to apply... ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Morality and ethics by Kant

...Morality and ethics by Kant Morality and ethics are hard subjects to deal with. With the varying beliefs systems being followed by different societies, coming up with a universal answer is practically impossible.                 Kant tried to answer these moral nuances. For him, man follows a certain code of conduct. That, however, will depend on his imperative and own will. He states, “the representation of an objective principle so far as it necessitates the will is called a command (of reason), and the formula of the command is called an imperative” (Kant, 24). Imperative is an ought; it is the voice in our heads that pushes us to do good. Simply put,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Immanuel Kant the secretary. It is also obvious that the information will be broadcast later to all of us. My friends, ignorant of this, plan a weekend road trip, and set out early on Friday evening. I find myself excusing myself from the trip on the pretext of a bad cold. The next day, I put in my time at the office. On Monday, the Manager offers me the promotion. My silence is definitely an ethical decision. My motive of securing the promotion makes me hide the information in the memo from Tom. I am aware that this action is in conflict with my duty as a friend. However, I justify my action on the basis that I am not responsible for the road trip: in fact the idea is Tom’s. Tom voluntarily goes on the trip. I am not using Tom...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay


... Does Kant adequately solve the problems evident in the controversy between empiricism and rationalism? The bone of contention between empiricism and rationalism occurs within epistemology that is involved in the limits of knowledge, studying nature and sources. To this end, Kant’s contribution between empiricism and rationalism entails the application of the limits, powers of reason as well as his famous critiques of reason and judgment. Consequently, he offers a synthesis of empiricism and rationalism while disputing the idea that knowledge of the true world is discovered by way of reason or inferred from experience. Kant believed that despite empiricists and rationalists following different paths, they all arrived at a similar... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Kant's Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals

...Metaphysics of Morals A person has the free will to do anything one wants, however according to Kant in “Ground Work forthe Metaphysics of Moral”; the will of a person is bound by moral law if that will is free. According to Kant, “An act from obligation has its moral worth, in the maxi, in accord with which is obvious of and as a result does not depend upon the attainment of the object of the action but purely upon the norm of violation in accord with which the action is” (Kant and Allen, 34). This means that the real or the intended consequences of an action does not determine moral worth of an action. The moral worth is determined by the principle acted upon. Therefore, as a Kantian,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

British Literature; Shakespeare's Sonnets a crucial thing that conquers all great and small alike. It predominates in sonnet 18 of Shakespeare to the extent he inscribes his lover in a poem for intentions of keeping him in the minds of many in ages to come. Not only does these forms an inspiration point in this poem, but also an excellent source of motivation for the audience. For Shakespeare, it is a wish well achieved. Works Cited Carlsen, G. Robert, and Miriam Gilbert. British and Western Literature: A Thematic Approach. Webster Division, McGraw-Hill, 1985. Print. Kirchmayer. An Interpretation of Sonnet Nr. 18 by Shakespeare: “Shall I Compare Thee to a summer’s Day?” GRIN Verlag, 2010. Print. Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ticknor and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The British Empiricists and Kant's Ethics for FREE!

Contact Us