Classic Knitwear Collaboration with Guardian Case Study - 38. https://studentshare.org/business/1860266-case-study
Classic Knitwear Collaboration With Guardian Case Study - 38. https://studentshare.org/business/1860266-case-study.
The paper "Classic Knitwear Collaboration with Guardian" is a delightful example of an assignment on marketing. The product-company fit Initially, ic Knitwear, Inc. ic) was producing unbranded knitwear which, was not much recognized especially by the retail customers, consequently limiting the company chance of differentiating its products. However, in September 2006, Classic Knitwear Inc. led by its Chief Marketing Officer Brandon Miller decided to brand the company’s products in order to improve gross margin.
The introduction of branded insect repellent clothing was the only way out to improve the gross margin of the company. Although they had tried to engage competitively with the leading branded product manufacturers, prevailing competition could not allow them to meet the increasing market demand. Classic collaboration with Guardian in branding their shirts could not taint their images since it was essentially known to provide a variety of products thus customers will not change the perception towards the company.
The product-market fit Classic shirts could easily gain high sales considering some favorable market factors in their target market. Firstly, the cost of launching new products could only cost over $ 3 million. Incurring low capital would enable heighten on such things as advertising in order to improve expected sales. The presence of many wholesale markets would also enable classic get to the market niche as there were only a few firms offering similar products. Availability of ready market especially retailers and wholesalers could help raise the profit margin easily as Miller had intended.
The fact that repellent shirts are only commonly in niche markets precisely for hunters and anglers, it could be very easy for Classic to convince customers who associate guardian products with quality to buy their shirts. Will consumers and trade respond to the Guardian marketing program? Yes, because, customers were becoming more aware of insect-borne diseases and they would like to prevent themselves. Classic developed the idea after witnessing a number of attempts to create awareness of insect-borne diseases using measures that were not satisfactory to most Americans.
They, therefore, found it as an opportunity to provide shirts made of fiber since they proved convenient as insect repellents. Considering that insect repellent clothing was already in use especially in a niche market, precisely among hunters and fishermen, it could be easy for Classic repellent shirts to attract customers because they were slowly becoming common in mass -markets. Customers that do not like carrying traditional liquid repellents thus gaining a strong market position could also facilitate sales.
What other problems do you see in the proposed Guardian marketing program? The agreement implies that the Guardian is consulted for approval before any writing is done on the shirt. This may imply slow decision making that can consequently slow delivery of products to customers. According to the agreement, sales are projected to increase steadily over the four years with the first three years contributing subsequently towards achieving fourth-year sales target, which may be affected by economic instability thus not hitting the target.
Finally, there is the fear of dissolution especially if the Guardians feel that the new product has an adverse effect on their liquid-repellent products implying that $100,000 would be refunded to the other party. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the licensing agreement? The potential partnership between Classic and Guardian could help them increase the customer base by convincing enthusiastic customers who do not like carrying traditional liquid repellents. This will ensure customer satisfaction regardless of their diverse taste and preferences.
Additionally, considering positive customer association with Guardian’s products, it could be easy to start partnership investment with the small capital of just over $ 3 million. However, some doubts developed concerning the success of the partnership. Firstly, according to Chong, the new partnership could risk the success of Classic in innovating new products later. Additionally, Ortiz believed that partnership could downgrade Classic since the products will be using Guardians' name and instead suggested research on improving new products.
What sales volume is required to break even on Classic’s 2-year marketing investment? Year 1 Cost per unit= [manufacturers selling price per unit-(less cost per unit+ promotion cost allowances)] = [17.87-(10.82+0.89+036)] = $ 5.
80 Year 2 1st year cost per unit $ 5.80 Less royal payments $ 0.83 2nd year cost per unit = $ 4.96 2nd year breakeven= estimated sales/ cost per unit= $ 135,500/4.96 = $ 276,000 shirtsIf Classic implements all of Miller’s marketing recommendations, what is the estimated demand for the new product line over the 2-year launch period?
Estimated demand for two years Targeted customers 100,000,000 Add: awareness (12.5*100,000,000) 12,500,000 Interested with the product: (185/1000)=0.
185*12,500,000 2,312,500 Assume 60% of definitely will buy (38%) (0.38*0.6)2,312,500 527, 250 50% will buy coming year (0.
5*263, 625) 131,813 Expected demand after Miller recommendation 659,063
Read More