Workforce Diversity Bringing Business Benefits to the Business Setting - Essay Example

Human Resources (HR) al Affiliation: Human Resources (HR) Human Resources (HR) Diversity management involves valorisation and recognition of people’s differences. The diversity concept embraces the scope of respect and acceptance. It also includes ways of understanding that all individuals are unique while recognizing their individual differences. Such approaches are well along dimensions of race, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, ethnicity, physical abilities, gender, political beliefs, socioeconomic status, age, or other ideologies. For this reason, the exploration of differences within safe and positive environments nurtures good relations. Moreover, the understanding in which each of the components moves beyond the simple tolerance in celebrating and embracing diversity’s rich dimensions for each individual unlike pure compliance for equality and affirmative action is in line with the laws approach. Similar to the US perspective, ‘Diversity management’ represents break from fundamental equality concepts including the affirmative actions and equal opportunities (Nigam & Zhan, 2011). On the other hand, such an implicit and distinction sequencing between equality and affirmative action provisions and diversity management may not be representative of all countries across the globe. For example, equality and diversity management notions seem allow growth in parallel as well as diversity management as vehicles towards institutionalization of equality as well as positive action provisions. In France, debates on discrimination and diversity management simultaneously grew instead of in succession of each other. The research taken up in this case provides the modest support for proposals of workforce diversity bringing business benefits to the business setting. For this reason, the idea is open to further research. Whether the issue of diversity depends on environmental factors or pays off is an internal consideration for the firm (Nussbaum, 2003). The gender diversity impacts on a managerial level are conditional with respect to the strategic orientation of the firm. This also coordinates the multivariate interaction and organizational culture among such variables. While the culture of the firm incorporates normative assumption that diversity is a critical opportunity, age diversity is one of the team innovativeness predictors. Diversity in nationality, age as well as functional background develops positive influences for the team innovativeness across the context of high transformational leadership even with no effect for low ones. Both positive and negative direct diversity affect performance. In cases, which are under this scrutiny, different organizational context aspects or group processes come in handy in moderating diversity-performance relationship. On a similar note, failure of proper management of diversity for developing diversity leads to mixed results. The overall research points at the fact that diversity requires properly management for reaping any business benefits (Nigam & Zhan, 2011). For proper management, diversity holds its overall business promises. This element does not extensively preclude for reasons of diversity across all societal levels as is necessary to achieve such goals. Away from business benefits, there is more attention towards societal benefits for the promotion of various diverse and inclusive workforces. For proper management of diversity, there is need to foster an exclusive organizational performance. It is also relevant for managers to have an understanding of the value cognitive diversity. Part of the reasons in this case includes problems hitting todays business activities, as they are complex to extents of posing possible failure. The cognitive diversity concept therefore is desirable to achieve good management. For this reason, research projects are more expensive which is partly because of the economic hard times. The other outcome of economic downfall is that of greater urge for innovation. With the significant increase in competition, companies embrace the essence of diversifying and innovating on fields as compared to the direct and indirect components (Nussbaum, 2003). Another point of concern included the importance of predicting upcoming trends in becoming relevant for the modern day business skills. As part of cognitive diversity, elements of group-based diversity include diversity along age, ethnic, gender, religious and socio-economic status divergence. It is important to comprehend the elements of value and manage. Based on this, implications of managers in working towards visibility are more practical as compared to concepts described alongside. This is a hand-on approach. In realizing the employees’ potential in businesses, business managers need to open in accepting individual differences. For various cases, managers seek to see their employees to develop a behavior in different ways, while such an approach is not technique that employees use for extensive efficiency (Nigam & Zhan, 2011). In realizing the employees’ potential, it is helpful to generate teams with a capacity of addressing complex problems as well as making better predictions. The facts that people embrace actions, which are different, represent their different backgrounds. The broad scope of ideas is in the pool of thought. In such an approach, the most appropriate solution is easily in calculation. In this way, the firm taps into diversities with respect to interpretations, heuristics, perspectives, and predictive models in creating innovative organizations with a capability of developing competitive advantage (Dollard & Winefield, 1996). Social justice models evolve towards extending the notion that individuals who do not consider dominant groups need opportunities across the workplace. This is both because it was within the law and because it is the right approach to take. Such a model revolves around the tokenism idea even though it brings in the direction of hiring based on "good fit". With social justice, the developed models of representation as well as diversity acceptance for reasons that diversity expands beyond ethnicity, race and gender to indulge physical ability, sexual orientation, and age (Mendenhall & Milhouse, 2001). Currently, the model of diversity is part of the inclusion as it is a reflection of globalized economies. The multicultural work force embraces value as is attached to the diversity of thought as well as the perspectives in shared individual standpoints to benefit various organizations’ practical understanding in capitalizing on them. Business cases for diversity theorize on grounds that for global marketplaces, companies that employ diverse workforces are better in understanding the marketplace demographics they serve. They are better loaded to continue thriving in such marketplaces as compared to companies that have limited employee demographic range. Past having the workforces, which illustrate the extensively changing demographics for the consumer markets, they develop an ability of better understanding their productivity, preferences and desires, and costs in their analysis. This assists them in building the business cases in terms of extensive diversity inclusion. For the deficit model, any organizations, which do not embrace diversity inclusion culture, higher absenteeism, invites lower productivity and higher turnover that results in higher operating costs for the company (Yum, 2007). Further, companies’ foster environments of inclusiveness to gain better problem-solving opportunities, increasing levels of productivity as well as increasing their market share and its application to the investment model as well as value-added models while within the set diversity inclusion strategies. However, either model will require intentional implementation across top leadership in terms of the culture of acceptance and inclusion. However, a due absence of documented illustration which either diversity model presents is that of hiring and helps businesses financially. Diversity is one of the most beneficial aspects of the organization as noted in most markets. However, there lacks documented illustrations for this. Business diversity brings substantial potential profitability benefits including extensive decision-making as well as improved problem solving for greater innovation and creativity. This translates into enhancement for product development as well as successful marketing to different segments of customers. Modern day diversity avails organizations with an ability of competing within global markets. Simply put, the recognition of diversity within corporations helps in linking several talents across the organization (Nussbaum, 2003). The aspect of diversity recognition also allows those employees with these talents to feel needed and have a sense of belonging, which in turn increases the levels of commitment to the organization while allowing each of them to participate in unique ways. The standpoint theory points out that all marginalized groups embrace different perspectives to organizations while challenging the status quo based on the socially constructed view that differs from the one of the dominant groups. Even though such a dominant group standpoint, often carries more weight, transformational leaders keep encouraging conflicting standpoints to relate well within the organization. This creates forums for extensively sanctioned conflicts to peruse. This way, conflict develops from putting to task the manner in which such things consider the ideas and problems, which do not explore multiple perspectives. The standpoint theory provides voices for the position towards seeing behavior patterns that the persons immersed within such cultures develop difficulty in acknowledging (Mendenhall & Milhouse, 2001). With this perspective, the varying and unique standpoints eradicate the groupthink, which also develops within the homogenous groups. Models in this area demonstrate that the heterogeneous teams are consistent with out-performing homogeneous teams for a range of tasks. However, diversity for teamwork is not entirely simple and hence, there are challenges towards fostering inclusive environments within the workplaces with respect to a diversity of ideas and thoughts. One of the most apparent challenges organizations have in adopting environments that are more inclusive includes the assimilation of members outside the lead group. The interplay between discursive acts, ideology, and power serves as a reinforcement of the hegemonic organizational structures (Nigam & Zhan, 2011). All aspects ranging from organizational rituals, symbols, and stories seek to maintain the power position occupied by the dominant group. This concept’s extension into diversity inclusion elements that organizations hire and promote individuals into management positions who are not integral parts of the dominant group. The tension is between the acceptance of cultural diversity and organizational norm of social construction. In the end, such individuals undergo mentorship and coaching as a way of adopting the main traits for inclusion within privileged groups, unlike receiving embarrassment for such differences (Kramar & Syed, 2012). Those assimilating the same face denial of the potential to express their selves across workplaces. They face compulsion into repressing significant elements of their respective lives in social context. This frames a conclusive part of the daily engagements with people. People spending significant levels of energy to cope with alien environments in having less energy allow them to perform their jobs. Assimilation creates situations that people with substantial difference face a possibility of failing and decreases the organizations productivity. That means that, with diverse workforces, the management has to work even harder towards reaching such levels of productivity as those with less diverse workforce. The other challenge facing organizations in the strife towards fostering workforces that are more diverse include managing diverse populations. The management of diversity goes way beyond the simple acknowledgement of people’s differences. Most of the organizational theorists suggest that the work-teams with highly diversity ratios are difficult to manage and motivate for various reasons. The main challenge in this case is miscommunication among the departments in an organization. Work groups with cultural diversity have cross-cultural differences leading to thorough miscommunication. This also means that diverse workforces lead to significant challenges within the top management. However, there are a number of competencies, which facilitate the development of effective communication across diverse organizational environments. This way, the skills involve empathy, strategic decision-making, and self-monitoring (Lockwood, 2005). Self-monitoring refers to the awareness of a communicator for how behavior affects others along with willingness of modifying this behavior on grounds of knowledge and its impact. Empathy allows the receiver to concentrate beyond literal meaning of messages through considering the feelings, values, needs, and assumptions of the communicator. Strategic decision-making indicates that the sources and channels of communication as engaged in reaching organization members and the substance of the messages conveyed. While speakers (both native and non-native) pass such messages, they differently interpret the information. Contrary to the strategy, extreme modification looks to get involved directly in the office methods to experience balanced workforces (in respect to all dimensions), as well as a reasonable submission of benefits among workers. The strategy is thus more result of targeting on developing the rules to ensure equal treatment. One major tool of this strategy is allocations, which are in the companies with the aim to control variety of the employees and equivalent opportunities (Karsten & Illa, 2005). Allowance techniques concern their efficiency. Justifications for and against quota techniques in companies include distinct ideas such as: allocations m for actual limitations that prevent marginalized members from getting their reasonable proportion of managing roles to allocations are against equal chances of all and suggest that marginalized members only got the position to complete the quota. Life changing modify includes an equivalent chance plan for both the immediate need as well as long-term solutions. For the temporary consideration, it utilizes new actions to reduce prejudice in techniques such as marketing or recruiting. However, the lengthy run is a venture of change for companies. This strategy understands the lifestyle of power techniques and looks for to task the current hegemony through execution of equal rights principles. One illustrative case for transformational change is age management; Younger workers appear to be more impressive and versatile, while mature workers are associated with higher costs of wage, medical care needs, and benefits. Therefore, companies may prefer young workers to mature staff. Through application of the transformational idea, an immediate involvement provides needed relief while a longer-term lifestyle move happens (Inyang, 2008). For the short-term, a company can set up regulation avoiding elegance based on age. However, for the long-term remedy, negative generalizations of mature workers needs changing with the positive understanding that mature workers can add value to the office through their experience and understanding. To balance this idea with the benefit of advancement and versatility that comes with youngsters, an assortment of ages in the employees is ideal. Through transformational change, the short-term remedy offers the company the time necessary to create deep-based lifestyle changes leading to a comprehensive environment. Handling diversity goes far beyond the boundaries of equivalent employment chance and positive activity. Ideal planning is necessary for creating effective, different workers. They seek out continuous learning opportunities and continuing diversity understanding training for business managers and workers (Harzing & Pinnington, 2011). Managers must be willing to perform towards changing the organization to make a culture of variety and addition that follows the objective, vision, and principles set forth by the management. Techniques towards corporate variety control are distinguishable through life changing changes. The idea identifies equal rights of chance in practice when all individuals are contending for public rewards easily and equally. The aim of the generous modify model is to have a fair labor market from which the best person is chosen for a job based completely on performance (Elkin & Strach, 2006). To support this idea, it is important to create structures of official guidelines where policymakers are responsible for guaranteeing that these guidelines on all forms of discrimination. One weak point of the view is that the official guidelines cannot cover every part of work life, as there is usually a casual part to perform such as appreciation categories, invisible transcripts, and alternative casual interaction programs. The liberal-change approach centers on law, conformity, and lawful charges for non-compliance. These anti-discrimination laws and regulations maintain positive activity and guarantees equivalent treatment for job candidates and companies regardless of their sex, physical capability, race, age, sexual alignment, and belief structure. A process that is in line with the different levels of language and reading expertise across the workers which also includes taking additional time for an assurance that information in an important memorandum as recognized. Such initiatives on the part of managers need reinforcement and compensation as good control techniques for working with different employees. Handling diversity concentrates on increasing the capability of all workers to promote business goals (Chaudhuri, 2010). Affirmative activity concentrates on specific categories because of traditional elegance. Affirmative activity concentrates on lawful requirement and public responsibility; managing variety concentrates on business requirements. In short, while managing diversity is also concerned with underrepresentation of individuals in the workplace, it is much more inclusive and understands that diversity must perform for everyone. The lifestyle of an organization is indicative of the power. A study of successful modern companies in contrast to monolithic and dual companies is recognizable by applying concepts of power, which have progressed over time. Feature power concept indicates that power is reliant on physical and social features of the individual and greatly based on Western societies. Theories that deal with energy and power will include the autocratic, democratic, and laissez-faire power designs, which reference the management and subordinate connection to circulating and discussing energy (Bowden & Mulnix, 2005). These can overlap and offer themselves to situational power, which recommend depending on the mixture of the connection actions and the projects at hand. The last types of power, which emphasize those of the modern companies, are life changing and discursive power (Boone & Bosch, 1997). Transformational power concentrates on change agents and those with a proficiency to see the perspective for the future and connect it to others. Discursive power takes a closer evaluation of a management ability to shape the business talk, significance, and causing understanding from all discursive functions, signs, and terminology. The mixture of these last two power designs makes a lifestyle that allows and motivates mid-level supervisors to use variety as a significant resource so they can improve business efficiency. Handling variety in the office as negotiating connections across culturally different groups, and contriving to get along in an environment recognized by social diversity. References Boone, P, and Van Den Bosch, A.J. (1997). Discerning a key characteristic of a European Style of Management. Int. Studies of Mgt. & Org, 26(3), 109-127. Bowden, R & Mulnix, M. (2005). Business Education: A View of U.S. and European Management Styles. Retrieved from http://businessperspectives.org/journals_free/ppm/2005/PPM_EN_2005_02_Bowden.pdf Chaudhuri, A. (2010). Yes: Indian Style of Management – Theory „i‟ Management. Retrieved from http://greathumancapital.wordpress.com/2007/01/31/yes-indian-style-of-management-theory-i-management/ Dollard, M.F & Winefield, A.H. (1996) Managing occupational stress: A national and international perspective. International Journal of Stress Management, 3(2): 69–83. Elkin, G and Strach, P. (2006) Lessons from the indigenous east for western organisations? Mechanistic and organic approaches to organization and management. Dunedin: University of Economic Prague. Harzing, A., Pinnington, A. (2011) International Human Resource Management. London: Sage Pub. Inyang, B. (2008). The Challenges of Evolving & Developing Management Indigenous Theories & Practices in Africa. In The International Journal of Business & Management 3(12), 50-70. Karsten, L and Illa, H. (2005). Ubuntu as a key African management concept: contextual background and practical insights for knowledge application. Journal of Management Psychology, 20 (17), 14-40. Kramar, R and Syed, J. (2012). Human Resource Management In A Global Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Lockwood, N. (2005). Workplace Diversity: Leveraging the Power of Difference for Competitive Advantage. SHRM Research Quarterly, 2 (20), 15-30. Mendenhall, M. et Milhouse, V. et al (2001) Transcultural Realities: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Cross-Cultural Relations. London: Sage Publications. Nigam, R. and Zhan, S. (2011). Management in Emerging vs Developed Countries: A Comparative Study from an Indian Perspective. The Journal of Centrum Cathedra, 4 (1), 121-133. Nussbaum, B. (2003) African Culture & Ubuntu. World Business Academy, 17(1) 25-68. Wang, J. et al. (2005). Confucian Values and the Implications for International HRD. In Human Resource Development International, 8(3), 311-326. Yum, J. (2007). Confucianism & Communication: Jen, Li and Ubuntu. China Media Research, 3(4), 15. Read More