Free

Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder perspective - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
In the world of business, various organs participate in ensuring its profitability ranging from the employees, the owners and most importantly the customers. In simple terms, there are referred to as the stakeholders since the business is somewhat affected by their actions…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder perspective
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder perspective"

STAKEHOLDERS PERSPECTIVE By: Word count In the world of business, various organs participate in ensuring its profitability ranging from the employees, the owners and most importantly the customers. In simple terms, there are referred to as the stakeholders since the business is somewhat affected by their actions. Often, some businesses regard their competitor as stakeholders because any action from them may have some implications. Originally, this term was greatly popularized from Edward Freeman in a book titled, Strategic management: A stakeholder Approach. Since then there has been a raging debate on which approach to apply while managing an organization. While the proponents of the shareholder perspective have their views so do the proponents of stakeholder perspective. In light of these two approaches, this paper will critically analyze the stakeholder perspective.
First, the shareholder approach focused primarily on the owners or individuals holding the shares in the company with little regard of the rest. That is to say, all decisions were taken with the concerns of the owners first then others’ later. Conversely, the stakeholder perspective advocates for recognition of other organs in the business whose influence is also vital. These include the customers, employees, suppliers, governmental bodies and now the owners. According to the contents in Freeman’s book, the traditional shareholder was not only unhelpful to the owners but also to the business as well since it failed to address the customer needs (Miles 2012).
Analysing this notion seems to reveal some truths in it though it also has some demerits, which could lead to negative impacts on the society. Lately, many companies have adopted stakeholder theory as a way of increasing profitability. The approach seeks to place the people seen as important to a business in a higher position (Miles 2012). That is to say, all actions taken by a corporate are focused on benefitting these people first. In this approach, the major people regarded highly include the owners, shareholders, customers, suppliers and in some case even competitors.
Since this approach focuses on the most important stakeholder in the business- the customer to be precise- a number of benefits are evident. Freeman suggested that whenever a business applies the stakeholders even the shareholders’ interests are safeguarded. Additionally, when this approach is adopted, the business will last longer and even exhibit performance (Miles 2012). This is because businesses are able to analyze the needs by various stakeholders including employees and develop strategies to ensure are met. In essence, if this perspective is applied without reservations it is undoubtedly one capable of achieving not only its goals but the needs of clients as well.
Notwithstanding this analysis, this approach has been repeatedly blamed for a decline of quality products and services. While companies purport to be focused on the major stakeholders, customers are seldom treated as such. Many times, corporate intend to make money at all cost and tend to compromise quality especially when it demands more input. This approach in itself is capable of transforming the organization and guaranteeing customer satisfaction but it is not always applied to the letter (Miles 2012). Consequently, it ends up being a polished theory with little, if any, outcome to display.
Having said this, the perspective in itself has its demerits one of which inability to speculate the future needs of the clients. While it is often portrayed as, a theory focused mainly on the major stakeholders, the ever-changing market trends make it hard to plan for the future (Miles, 2012). That is to say planning may not always correspond to other outcome sin the future hence rendering all the efforts inefficient. Therefore, one could conclude that stakeholder perspective is capable of achieving insurmountable success but require critical analysis of the market trends.
Bibliography
Miles, S., (2012). "Stakeholders: essentially contested or just confused?". Journal of Business
Ethics 108 (3): 285–294 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder Essay”, n.d.)
Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1674939-critically-assess-the-arguments-for-and-against-adopting-a-stakeholder-perspective
(Critically Assess the Arguments for and Against Adopting a Stakeholder Essay)
Critically Assess the Arguments for and Against Adopting a Stakeholder Essay. https://studentshare.org/business/1674939-critically-assess-the-arguments-for-and-against-adopting-a-stakeholder-perspective.
“Critically Assess the Arguments for and Against Adopting a Stakeholder Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1674939-critically-assess-the-arguments-for-and-against-adopting-a-stakeholder-perspective.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder perspective

Critically Debate The Arguments For And Against Global Mega-Mergers

...?International Business Table of Contents Question One A: Critically Debate The Arguments For And Against Global Mega-Mergers And Whether you Think They Are Beneficial Or Not. 3 Introduction 3 Arguments For and Against Global Mega-Mergers 3 Conclusion 6 Question One B: Discuss the Measures Firms Should Take To Reduce the Risk of Failure in both the Pre-Merger and Post-Merger Phases 7 Introduction 7 Mitigating the Risks 7 Conclusion 11 Question Two 12 Introduction 12 Expatriate Management 12 Conclusion 17 References 19 Question One A: Critically Debate The Arguments For And Against Global Mega-Mergers And Whether you Think They Are Beneficial Or Not. Introduction Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) can be considered as an integral part... of...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Critically discuss arguments for and against financial liberalisation

...? Critically discuss arguments for and against financial liberalisation In the last few decades, statistical figures show transformations in the socio-economic sector of Republic of Korea (ROK, Korea) which had suddenly transformed from having regressive and poor socio-economic conditions, into an advanced industrial society. During this time period, its rate of economic growth had persistently remained higher than the global or the regional averages (Amsden, 1992), and this was mainly owing to the policies of financial market liberalization that brought a huge inflow of foreign capital. At this time, Korea also underwent significant demographic changes, where the majority of its population started residing in urban areas. While... ...
14 Pages(3500 words)Essay

Burke's arguments against the French Revolution

...of the ‘terror’, he views greater autonomy and freedom with cultural and not simply political repercussions. In this sense, he might be regarded as a Platonist or an elitist. That is, a hierarchy must be maintained not simply to exert direct political control or authority, but also to convey a moral standard or what might be described as a standard of ‘taste’, so to speak. By this, it is implied to the extent that he is critical of the ‘decadence’ that greater freedom and autonomy (especially in Britain) has brought about. One could describe this social criticism as essentially a critique of the ‘nouveau riche’, over and against the preferred sentiments of aristocratic values. Concerning...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Arguments for and against Abortion

...? Arguments for and against Abortion Grade (4th, Nov. Arguments for and against Abortion Part The issue of abortion has been controversial for a long time. While some people argue that it is acceptable, others argue that it is wrong. Mary Anne Warren argues that abortion is not wrong. In support of her argument, she presents the following facts: According to Mary Anne Warren, abortion is not wrong because; removing a fetus from a mother’s womb is not taking away the life of a human being (Ford, 2002). According to her, killing a human being is wrong. However, a fetus does not qualify to be a human being because it does not have consciousness (Ford, 2002)....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Critically evaluate feminist arguments against the present system of science

..., and the importance of developing a form of science that gives consideration to women and women’s worldview and knowledge. These feminist arguments against science blended with an array of other perspectives against positivism, or rigid objectivity and certainty, as the epistemological foundation of the social sciences (Oakley, 2005, 42). The outcome is two conflicting methodological frameworks—qualitative and quantitative-- that disagree, instead of collaborate. The ‘qualitative’ method suggests that genuine social sciences take part only in spontaneous, contextual forms of knowledge acquisition or analysis, able to value diverse subjectivities; whilst the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Arguments For And Against Resistance To Change

...that it allows management to develop an open-ended view of change and consider the drawbacks of change. By doing so, managers can then come up with policies and procedures to counter the drawbacks and make change more workable and feasible for employees. Furthermore, the fact that resistance is seen as a “problem” to change leads management to derive strategies to overcome rather than engage it. Managers may often go at length to reduce the ‘threat’ of resistance and, in doing so, may adopt tactics that may be harmful to the organization. As a result, it is common to find management taking on an overly defensive role in trying to push the change too hard as well as become overly protective of their status in trying to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Arguments against abortion

...supports its illegalization. First, abortion involves taking human life away, hence tantamount to murder. With this argument, it would be critical to understand when life begins. Proponents of abortion argue that an embryo is not a human being. They argue that it is only until such an embryo acquires human characteristics that it shall be recognized as a human (Thomson, 2010). However, these proponents do not draw a clear line from which an embryo becomes human. Therefore, it would be more reasonable to consider an embryo as a full human or a person (Beckwith 1992). According to England (1996), the embryo starts developing immediately an oocyte is fertilized by a sperm, a process that results in the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Arguments against abortion

...on the screen in about two months, the fetus at this stage can be said to be alive. Further, the sonography has allowed us to notice unique set of patterns and that the presence of life form growing and developing in the mother's womb which has hands, legs, eyes, ears fingers, mouth and vital organs functioning as smoothly as in an adult. No more proof is required that there is life inside he womb and needs to be treated as life in normal sense. The point is simple. Medical science leads to a pro-life perspective rather than a pro-choice perspective. If medical science can be used at all to draw a line, the clearest line is at the moment of conception. Medical arguments provide a strong...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Stakeholder mapping Stakeholder analysis

...whose support proves critical for the implementation of the project. These stakeholders could be from either of the above two categories having significant influence over the functioning of the company. Stakeholder analysis tries to figures out all stakeholders and then categories them in these categories. Subsequently, a balanced approach in adopted by the company; which often happens to be a compromise between the goals of the organisation and the stakeholder groups. This is termed as2 ‘Behavioural theory of the Firm’. Stakeholder analysis is generally carried out in three simple steps; First step: Identifying the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

A Stakeholder Perspective

...to drought and herbicides at the same time they have enhanced nutritional enrichment as compared to the traditional crops. Despite this advantages a number of arguments have been advanced regarding genetically modified organisms ranging from their safety to if elaborate legislation measures have been put in place to regulate their use and distribution (Consumers Food Safety and Environment) This paper will be arguing on the genetically modified organism debate from a farmer’s perspective based in Ghana. Ghana is a third world country based in Africa and thus it is classified among the group of developing countries that face economic and food security problems over time. Farming in third world countries...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Critically assess the arguments for and against adopting a stakeholder perspective for FREE!

Contact Us