Major Features of Situational Leadership - Essay Example

However, House’s revised path-goal theory was based on expectancy theory which assumed that motivation to exert effort increases with environmental factors. However, this theory was reformulated, leading to the inclusion of leader behaviours, employee characteristics and leadership effectiveness.

These two situational leadership theories can be applied in an organization as they both combine styles and actual situations. For this reason, there is an inclusion of what could probably motivate an employee which can be generally understood from the actual prevailing situations. Combining these theories or leadership styles can somehow be effectively used in expanding the level of influence a leader must possess in an organization or team. For this reason, these leadership styles help maintain the idea of human resource motivation. In the case of motivating the team, to increase the level of influence of a leader, either one of these leadership styles could be applied within an organization. By employing a higher understanding of the situation in an organization and knowing the human resource’s actual needs that could motivate them, these two situational leadership could be entirely applied.

I think there is something wrong with this quote as it tries to emphasize leadership is primarily fueled by power. In this case, a woman is assumed less powerful than a man, making her less effective in leadership activity. There is a wrong conception of leadership in this case because, in the first place, it is not about power, but influence (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010). The other point is that there is another presumption about the capacity of women to lead a team, which is very autocratic and tries to come up with impossible actions. At this point, there is a strong connection about linking the idea of women’s leadership style and traits. Some theories try to expound the point that leadership can be reasonably described based on the leaders’ actual style and traits. However, there are some significant drawbacks to this as opposed to other leadership theories (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2010, p.472; Collins, 2005).