The Multinational Companies Debate - Essay Example

The argument on the need for ethical obligations for multinational companies is better explained by Team A considering the relevance to the subject, content presented, presentation, link to experimental studies, and flow of information.  This presentation clearly articulates why multinational companies should have ethical obligations by linking the reasoning with their goals.  Further, this presentation identifies the five most important reasons for multinational companies to adhere to ethical obligations.

Team A’s argument in support of ethical obligations for multinationals is strongly backed by information obtained from previous research.  For instance, the advantages of ethical obligations such as rise in market share, increase in market value, higher sales improved sales, lower employee turnover, and cost control are all explained with sufficient data obtained from previous research.  Furthermore, this presentation entices sufficient thought in the reader’s mind about the possible negative impact of multinational corporations, which is also explained in this presentation.  Another scoring point in Team A’s presentation is that it explains the potential negative impact of the absence of ethical obligations by explaining what kind of impact multinational companies can have on the economy, country, and environment if they did not have any ethical obligations towards these entities.

The main strengths of the presentation by Team B include its succinctness and reader-friendly approach.  This presentation highlights the most important points related to the kind of ethical obligations that multinational corporations have.  Further, it highlights the ethical considerations multinational companies have kinds of impact ethical obligations can have such as employment practices, workplace conditions, environmental impact, local customs, and ethics.  However, this presentation does not provide any information related to experimental evidence. Another weakness in Team B’s presentation is in its flow and presentation of information, which could have been better as it covered almost the same information as Team A, but without any experimental evidence.  Although the information here is not irrelevant, the relevance of the information presented is not established.  Lack of support from experimental evidence presents this as a weaker presentation.

The main strengths of Team A’s presentation include its presentation style, logic, flow, and link to experimental evidence.  Every point made in this presentation has been clearly explained and is aligned with the main question or topic of the presentation.  The main strength of Team B’s presentation is its ‘to the point’ approach, which makes it simpler and easier to understand; however, its incongruent flow and lack of supporting information make it weaker.  The only identifiable weakness in Team A’s presentation is its lengthy statements.  Otherwise, Team A’s presentation covers all relevant information to support its subject, unlike Team B’s presentation.