Nobody downloaded yet

Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
This paper aims to investigate the case of government intervention at Boeing and Airbus. The phenomenon of government intervention has been the subject of heated debates over several years as far as international business and trade is concerned. The debate is rested on practices that encourage free trade versus those that are protectionist or supportive in nature…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus"

Download file to see previous pages Globalization led to the cross-border free flow of capital, labor, information and other resources. Countries began to realize that the only way to reap the fruits of comparative advantage was to compete internationally. FDIs and generation of government revenues were common results of international business in technology intensive areas (page 33) (Cavusgil, Knight, & Reisenberger, 2012) and, thus, the collaboration of various European governments in this respect can be attributed to this reasoning. The major reason behind Boeing’s complains is that the provision of subsidies by the EU government to its competitor Airbus is preventing both the companies to compete on equal footing. It is seen as an unfair trade practice by the U.S, although, the case reflects that the country itself is offering protection to its airline Boeing, albeit, in a different way. Thus, although the U.S government is not providing outright subsidies to Boeing, it is still protecting its business by bestowing it with military contracts. The key elements highlighted in the case are those of intervention through provision of subsidies, development of infrastructure, tax rebates and strategic national contracts.
Part of the explanation underlying government support for Airbus is grounded in the democratic socialism political system of the EU. As learnt in the text, this form of system called social democracy is characterized by government intervention in private enterprises and in business activities....
To this extent, as pointed out in the case study, the governments of various EU countries including the French, German, Spanish and British governments have embarked on a mission to enhance the international competitiveness of its national airline, Airbus, through the provision of subsidies primarily. A major implication of globalization has been that in the midst of cut-throat competition, companies often find themselves competing on costs. The text also supports the fact that the costs of doing business are relatively higher in the EU which is largely because of high corporate taxes (page 178) (Cavusgil, Knight, & Reisenberger, 2012). This is a major reason behind the government rationale to support Airbus financially. To this extent that the cost of capital in EU is higher than that in U.S, the government’s intervention in Airbus’s operations is justified. The defensive rationale of government intervention manifests itself along these lines of thinking by claiming that protection of the national economy is a major factor behind government intervention (page 204) (Cavusgil, Knight, & Reisenberger, 2012). The offensive rationale is also applicable here, since one of the major reasons for government intervention in the case of Airbus was to protect the infant industry that could not compete effectively with the two giants (Mac Douglas and Boeing) and the creation of tax revenues. Also one of the fundamental justifications for the same was the generation of jobs and employment opportunities that were created once Airbus had its operations all over Europe (Cavusgil, Knight, & Reisenberger, 2012). Furthermore, this move of European governments to support Airbus and make it ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus Case Study”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus Case Study)
“Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus Case Study”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus

International Finance Airbus and Boeing

...? International Finance Compare and contrast the impact of foreign exchange risk on the two contrasting firm (Airbus and Boeing), and discuss how these firm should manage these risks. Boeing Company is the largest aerospace company of US. Its operations are in more than 90 countries. The commercial airplane division is the most prominent of all divisions. The company is headquartered in Illinois and known as premier US aircraft manufacturer. Boeing's revenue in the year 2010 was $64.31 billion and first-half revenue in 2011 was $31.45 billion. The company is subject to foreign currency exchange risk for company's revenue comes through its operations in various locations...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Managing Business in Europe - Airbus versus Boeing

...Managing Business in Europe - Airbus versus Boeing Introduction Airbus and Boeing are the two major manufacturers of airplanes not only in the European market but also in the world aircraft market. In particular, the competition has been quite rife between the aircraft manufacturers in the large commercial segment of the European aircraft market. The stiff competition between these companies has made them have duopoly power in the world airliner market beginning in the early 1990s (Irwin & Pavcnik, 2004). In addition, the competition has led the two firms to strategize with policies that would see them dominate both world and European aircraft markets. In addition to the...
12 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper

International Marketing (Airbus and Boeing)

...? The airline manufacturing business comprises of two massive firms, Airbus and Boeing. These two companies utilize different strategies in the marketing of their products as well as advancement of their products. This process will influence the market control of these companies in the future. These two organizations are inflecting two divergent niche markets with a twosome of flagship products. These dissimilar products deflect price competition by distinguishing product lines, which is crucial. Introduction Airbus and Boeing are amongst the two enormous companies controlling the jet airliner market place since 1990s. The Boeing organization is an...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Analysis of Airbus and Boeing

...? Executive summary This report analyses two aircraft manufacturing firms; Airbus and Boeing. The report is based on a case which mainly revolves around the airline manufacturing industry. The most important players in the airline manufacturing industry are Airbus and Boeing and both are competing against each other. Both Boeing and Airbus are being supported by the government of their respective countries and the financial aid given by the government has a major role to play in making sure that these firms are able to meet the demands of the stakeholders. The case reveals how the...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

Boeing versus Airbus Subsidy Dispute

...?Boeing vs Airbus subsidy dispute: The American jetliner company Boeing started operating before the European jetliner Airbus. Boeing along with McDonnell Douglas and Lockheed dominated the jetliner industry globally which completely sidelined the European divided commercial aviation industry. As a result of this, the four European governments joined hands and added their resources in a pool which ultimately resulted in the launch of Airbus (Gunstone, 2010). Airbus initially had the daunting challenges to compete in a market which was being dominated entirely by America. The new competitors were not able...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

A comparison of Boeing & Airbus

...? A comparison of Boeing & Airbus Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Company overview 4 Boeing 4 Airbus 5 Five competitive advantages 6 Quality (Being Right) 6 Speed (Being Fast) 8 Dependability (Being on time only) 9 [Source: Kanji, G. 2008 p.63] 11 Flexibility (Being able to change) 11 Cost (Being Productive) 12 References 15 Executive Summary The executive summary is of prime importance as it throws light on the overall aspects of the topic of operational management. Here the researcher has discussed the operational management and strategies of two leading aircraft manufacturing companies. Therefore, researcher mainly stressed on five key aspects of operational performance objectives which are quality, speed... depending...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Government intervention

...Government intervention: Introduction: This paper focuses on government intervention in times of economic down turn, the government has mechanisms to improve the current situation, and this involves the use of appropriate fiscal and monetary policies. Classical economists state that government intervention will only make things worse. Keynes (2007) on other hand states that the free market is not always efficient and the government has a role to play in ensuring that the market is efficient. In the great depression of 1930 government did little to solve the crisis, this depression was...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

International Business- Airbus versus Boeing - When is Intervention Not Intervention

...Airbus-Boeing WTO Dispute - Case Study Contents Airbus-Boeing WTO Dispute - Case Study Contents 2 Airbus-Boeing WTO Dispute 3 Critical Evaluation of arguments: 4 W.T.O.s position: 7 Airbus-Boeing WTO Dispute Key Issues: The case deals with disputes between European Union’s (EU) Airbus and US’ Boeing over subsidies provided to both of them over a period of time by the respective governments. The issue of direct or indirect subsidy provided to companies or industries by the governments, especially when both are World Trade Organisation...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Background on Boeing & Airbus

...Background on Boeing & Airbus The competition for jet airliners manufacturing has been monopolized by the two largest jet producersBoeing and Airbus. The two companies have been engaging each other with fierce competition for market shares in the global aircraft market. For the past couple of decades, the two companies have made groundbreaking progress in the manufacturing of some of the largest aircrafts in the world. The competition has been at equilibrium whereby whenever either of the companies introduces a new large model; their counterparts retaliate by introducing their own. The competition between the two companies should be attributed to the fast growth in the aircraft...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Boeing and airbus the existing problem (Harress). The competitors of the Boeing include the airbus and Lockheed martin. The airbus is one of the biggest passenger airplanes known worldwide. However, it has some issues that need to be dealt with. For instance, one major problem of the airbus is its sensitive warning system. The software is not able to handle manageable tolerances and, therefore, the system can be set off even with very minor problems in the aircraft. The warnings and alarms can set off an alert and even shut down a well-functioning plane (Flight Global). There is a need for the algorithm to be set straight so that it is less sensitive and to prevent further breakdown...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Government Intervention at Boeing and Airbus for FREE!

Contact Us