Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
Was the Government wrong against Howard Solomon Forest Labs? Howard Solomon is the head of Forest Labs which is a growing pharmaceutical company in the United States. He has been the CEO of this company since 1977, and the proxy statement of the company in 2010 says that “he possesses detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing the company” (Henning)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The new profits earned through the sales of Celexa were used by Solomon for the expansion of the company; he licensed several other drugs from pharmaceutical companies of Europe. However, Solomon has been accused of excessive marketing and the expansion of Forest is deemed as dangerous for other companies. Also, the profits made by Forest Labs over such a short span of time are unreasonable high. The previous year Solomon earned $8.3 million as the CEO of the company. However, it was found out that the Marketing Department had been marketing the earlier named antidepressants to adolescents and children, and that too illegally, although these drugs are not suitable for them. Hence, the Obama Administration decided to oust Howard Solomon from doing further business. Solomon agreed to pay a fine of $313 million for resolving the issue (Hooper and Henderson). In my opinion, the decision taken by the Government was ethical. This is because several pharmaceutical companies have been alleged of conducting business unethically in the past, but none of the charges or penalties levied against them seemed to have a deterrent effect on their business. Ousting a companies' CEO for conducting such activities should definitely bring out the desired effect as he would make efforts to correct the mal-practices prevalent in his company. There is always a counter argument which states that only ousting a CEO would not prevent the company from putting an end to its illegitimate practices; one should rather take a serious action against the entire marketing department which can directly be blamed for the offense. But, being the CEO of the company, the Government has full rights to hold Howard Solomon accountable for all the mal-practices going on within his company. The company shall also be fined a very heavy sum which is equivalent to the amount of sales made during the period of illegal marketing. But, I believe, the Government is justified in taking the step it took as it would serve as a starting ground and other CEOs whose companies are also indulged into such activities would learn lessons from it and would take action to stop any objectionable activities within them. By taking this decision, the Government is trying to send a message to the entire industry which, hopefully, would be heard by them. Also, there is a certain provision in the Federal Law that legitimizes the exclusion of an individual who has not been alleged of a crime. Hence, this action of the Government is in coherence with the American Law and thus, the Government cannot be questioned. By concealing negative case study about Celexa and by pushing sales representatives to pay illegal kickbacks to pediatricians, the senior executives of Forest Labs indeed proved to be highly culpable (Singer). Antidepressants can be highly lethal for adolescents and children. It is a belief that this is a cause of suicidal behavior in children and mental illnesses. This fact has been verified by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Among the various side effects that children experience due to such medications the common ones are feelings of sedation and weight gain, whilst some children may feel more energized with the intake of antidepressants. In short, antidepressants cause psychotic problems in children which are very harmful. Hence, I believe that
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Forest Labs Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1430292-forest-labs-case
(Forest Labs Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Forest Labs Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1430292-forest-labs-case.
What is usually required is that the person vicariously liable has in some manner conceivably authorized the conduct giving rise to the tort. There are three circumstances in which one person may be held vicariously liable for the misconduct of another.1 They are:
1. A master/servant relationship such as an employer/employee. In these types of relationships, the master is liable for the misconduct of an employee provided the latter is acting in the course of his or her employment.
On the facts of the case for discussion, the vicarious liability involved turns on the master/servant or employer/employee relationship. The general rule is that it is the nature and circumstances of the actual employment that justi...
In 1801, Lemuel Shaw started studying law and was admitted to the bar in September 1804; after which he started practicing in Boston. Slowly his practice became large, however, he also served as the adviser of several commercial enterprises. Not only that, he held many public positions, from 1811 – 1814, as well as in 1820 and 1829, he was a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, during 1820 he also was a member of the constitutional convention, while in 1821 –1822, he served as a state senator. He was offered the position of Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court; after being so appointed in 1830, he served there for 30 years, till August 21, 1860, when he resigned. He had four children from t...
Once the court is satisfied that the “declarant had the requisite intention it will strive to validate it.”3 Certainty of intention will therefore be the most important element for determining whether or not the letter constitutes an enforcable trust.
Assuming that the trust held by the trustees under the father’s will trust in favor of Sally and the trust agreement in respect of the horse are valid trusts the question of cetainties are not valid except to the extent that a new trust is created in favor of Sally’s children and thereby extinguishing the previous trusts. This is particularly so with respect to the will trust. The trust agreement over the horse only involves the disposition of a ben...
There were several basic legal provisions that gave direction to the formation of a company in the United Kingdom. It has its original foundation in 1844 when the Joint Stock Companies Act1 1844 was formulated. It has given regulations for facilitating the formation of companies by "deed of settlement". Gradually, the shareholder concept was initiated in 1855 by the general incorporation procedure in the name of Limited Liability Act2 1855. This has offered limited liability to shareholders and provided identification to the company as a separate legal persona. The doctrine of limited liability postulates that a company shall be liable for the debts that it incurs, and even if it undergoes closure for any grounds, creditors cannot...
On the other hand, it would be required that the firms interested to operate globally can meet the demands of the market in which they plan to enter.
In the case of India, the operation of foreign firms across the country is related to a series of problems. More specifically, private – driven commercial activities cannot be expanded further from a pre-defined framework: there are commercial activities in the country that belong to the exclusive administration of the government and they are conducted by state-owned enterprises. India is a country of low income (referring to the income of the vast majority of its population which is estimated to be approximately 1,165,577,000 in accordance with a recent report publishe...
The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
... Sam Slime This could certainly be the case of the rich get richer and the poor go to jail, especially in a country that is trying to serve many masters. The government of the United States is certainly a political and governmental entity, but at it heart it has almost always been a voice of corporate business and expansion of wealth for the few. It operates seemingly under the principle guise of what is good for business is good for the people. One could say that the state of the economy today is the fallout of this mindset. In the “Sam Slime” case study we see the idea of liberty as applied by several masters. The first, when Sam Slime mugs you outright is a matter for governmental law and order. Cleary there is a criminal (Sam...
Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.
Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“
It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.
This standard requires everyone to take care and control of any activity that is ought to happen or be done by dementia patients as their personal responsibility. The client being Mr Paul is likely to suffer a high head concussion or even a sudden death. Dementia patients don’t have control or clear conscience on the act they do when they feel frustrated, the organization where he was as likely to suffer from poor operation and an eventual closure due to poor treatment of clients. Quality standards cover the care and support to people living with dementia. The standard applies to all social care settings and services working with caring for people with dementia. The standards also extend to cover care provided by health...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Forest Labs Case"
with a personal 20% discount.