Architecture as Industry / Architecture and the Author - Essay Example

?Architecture as Industry Architecture and the Architecture is a wide range of activities that are involved in building and erecting structures. This is not an easy job especially when the architectures that are involved are not well credentialed and experienced. Therefore, it needs experts that have garnered vast experience in the field to perform a stunning job. First, the architectures have to plan for the product. This involvers monitoring and evaluation the site in which the building will be erected. It will be followed by evaluating the needed space for the structure or building. This is vital especially when the land and materials are limited. After planning, the architectures have to embark on designing the structure or building that should be erected. When designing, the designers have to ensure the interest of the person is need are considered vital. This will be a pleasing outcome as the person in need will be given superb services in line with the needs in the structure or building. Designing is considered one of the most technical works in the erection of the structure. For instance, designers have to consider the height at sea level of the place. This will be vital in ensuring the structure is strong and will not be shaken. Similarly, designing has to consider the type of building and structure. The design will also have to consider the height of the structure. Some structures are built in places that do not favor skyscrapers. When in such a situation, the designers will have to consider designing a building that is not taller than the required standards. This will ensure the building is everlasting and does not cause havoc. The last stage in architecture is the construction of building and structure. Construction is also a technical job that requires vast knowledge and experience. The constructers and contractors have to use their vast knowledge in ensuring the building is safe and is erected according to the specification. For instance, time should be a considerable factor when erecting such structures and building. Haphazard construction of buildings could be detrimental to the investors and the owners as they could get loses. Buildings that do not conform to the stated requirements often have problems. Therefore, the constructers have to ensure they are doing the right thing in constructing the best structures. In the past, some buildings were specifically made for historic events. Such buildings were architectural achievements that were works of art that are highly respected. The authors of these historic sites are renowned architectures with vast experience and knowledge of architecture. To make these building look historical sites, there are some materials that were used. This is to give an impression that the buildings are one of a kind. This differentiates any other building from such building. Some of these materials were highly valued while others were scarce. The scarcity and expensiveness of these materials makes the historic sites incomparable to any other site that is achieved in the world. In many cases, the historic sites were highly valued and they could never be sold. In some instances, the historic sites were considered valueless since the value of the materials and the nature of the construction could not be evaluated. Similarly, the loyalty accrued by these building was highly valued and could never be paid. Back. This explains why the themes in architecture are considered vital though the architecture in structure may differ from the authors in architecture. Apparently, they seem to understand each other is such instances. Therefore, they are both vital, depending on the dialect. The architecture explains the same things that conform to architecture and construction, making them identical in vast areas. There is a difference in the architecture as an industry and the author in architecture. There are various argumentative points that will be of focus. First, there is a need to look at the whole issue in a reflective point of view. This states that there is a need to look at the whole architecture as an industry. This will derive a number of points that will be used as focus points. Inn today’s world, architecture are relying on the architecture industry especially in mass production. This depicts the modern culture where mass production is savored. , as production is widely advantageous to the architectures as they save time, energy and resources. Similarly, this is an avenue of utilizing their time to get more income. Previously, architectures would only focus on a single project for a long period of time. Until the project is finished, they are not likely to embark on another. However, in this modernized period, some architects tackle a wide range of works and still finish them in time. This shows the development and revolution in architecture and how it has improved significantly. On the other hand, there is a need to focus on the author as an individual. This will give enough information on how the two themes are different and any comparison to the issue. Without such approach, the research will not substantially exhaust the issues and themes in architecture. Secondly, the research will use the theoretical approach in what conforms to the two themes. The two themes might look similar but they have their vast differences. Looking at the theoretical combinations will give enough information on the discrepancies between the two dialect themes. For instance, focusing on the same approach in the different dialect themes will give vast information on the differences between the two themes. Lastly, there will be a need to look at the professional view of both dialect themes. Professionals have vast knowledge about the two dialect themes and are likely to give a professional addition and information that will be considered vital in the research. Professionals have vast knowledge of their specialized area and will give a better reflection in regard to the whole issue. 3.1 early thesis In the early 20th century and the late 19th century, architecture was different in comparison to these days. Architecture as a structure was not well designed and relied on the ancient construction methods. These were basic construction methods that did not come up with the most favorable structures. For instance, the technology was not advanced, and this would not give architecture an added advantage in erection of buildings and structures. However, in today’s world, there is a difference in the architecture as a structure. The difference is that architecture as a structure focuses on the professionalism of making buildings that conforms to the architecture. Previously, architectures have been using professional services according to the profession. This follows a laid down criterion of making sure buildings are appropriately built. As such, it follows the professionalism of making structures as stated by the architectural directions. This encompasses the designs, construction of the buildings and the environs. In actual sense, there was use of conventional way of building structures and ensuring they are up-to-date. However, different authors have different views on architecture. For instance, Curtis takes a wide scope of architecture by focusing on the contemporary architecture (Curtis, 1996: 21). Curtis clearly states the developments that have taken place in architecture since time immemorial. The author gives historical view of architecture and how this has developed the professionalism of erecting and building structures. The author gives a master interpretation with strong analysis of the profession from the ancient times. This interpretation has been helpful to the emerging and developing architectures in the world (Pearlman, 2007: 28). As such, they have been able to develop to greater heights in the profession. With such informative articles, the architects have been able to come up with succinct and well designed structures. According to research, architecture has gone through transformation and metamorphosis and has been influential in the whole world. With such activities in the profession, it is easier to come up with structures and buildings that are adorable in the whole world. Recent synthesis According to Fazio, Moffett and Wodehouse, architecture has been going through transformation depending on the architects in question (Fazio, Moffett, and Wodehouse, 2003: 16). Architects have been developing in their creativity to make better and decent structures. The authors state that the architects of the 21st century are mot e developed and elaborate in matters concerning buildings and structures. This has been a turning point of many architects as they deem to make a better outcome in architecture. The authors state that there is a difference between the architects and architecture as a profession. They state that while architecture sticks to the aspects that were developed in the ancient time, the new and developing architectures are taking a new turn in the architecture profession. Most of the emerging architectures have reconsidered the profession and considered making more elaborate structures. As such, they have come up with structures that are different from the ancient buildings. This states the reason why there is a difference between the structures that existed in the 19th century and the structures that are existing in the 21st century. Though the ancient architectural buildings are still in existence, the new architectural methods are overpowering the old structures and buildings. As such, there is a wide range of buildings and structures. Anti-synthesis Le Corbusier states that architecture has taken greater turns in improving the profession (Le Corbusier, 2008: 15). The profession in architecture has been improving with each passing day. For instance, architectures have generated better ways of creating appealing buildings. In many cases, the architectures have been considering space and focusing on the future. This states the reason for the emergence of skyscrapers in the world. Since there is limited space in the world, architects have been considering the issue of space and how to utilize the limited space. Therefore, skyscraper was the better option in utilizing space. Buildings on top of each other make use of the favorable space that is provided. This has generated more complex ways of coming up with buildings that can house a large number of people. In addition to saving space, buildings of the 21st century are cost effective. The cost of building skyscrapers is considerably lower than the expenses of other buildings in the world. Materials costs Synthesis Frampton states that technology has been influential in architecture as a structure (Frampton, 2001: 17). In most instances, the merging architectures try to utilize technology to the fullest. This leads to well articulated structures and buildings that are reckoned. For instance, in these days, computers and other softwares have been designed to suit the architecture profession. This brings the issue of making technological changes in architecture. In ancient times, architects used to manually draw plans for structures. These manually drawn plans were prone to mistakes and they did not have the actual measurements. As such, some buildings were haphazardly erected with mistakes in their measurements. However, with the emergence of technology, architecture as a profession has been enhanced to the better. This weeds out any instances of wrong measurements and building that are not proportional. Loos states that in these days, architecture has taken a turn into observing environmental issues (Loos, 1998: 12). The environment is a vital subject that has been a focal point by many institutions as such, there is a need to protect the environment and avoid pollution. This has helped architects to look for better ways of protecting the environment and ensuring there is conservation of the environment. Reflective and conclusion In conclusion, architecture as a profession has changed to the better in the 21st century, when compared to the 19th and 20th century, there are clear discrepancies between the two. Authors state that inclusion of technology and better ways of architecture have improved the profession. Similarly, emergent issues are well taken care of. References Curtis, W. (1996) Modern Architecture since 1900. London: Phaidon. Loos, A. (1998) Ornament and Crime: Selected Essays. Selected and introduction by Adolf Opel. Riverside: Ariadne Press. Frampton, K. (2001) Studies in Tectonic Culture: The Poetics of Construction in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Architecture. Cambridge: Mass: MIT Press Fazio, M., Moffett, M. and Wodehouse, L. (2003) A World History of Architecture. London: Laurence King. Le Corbusier. (2008) Toward an Architecture. London: Frances Lincoln ltd. Pearlman J. (2007) Inventing American modernism: Joseph Hudnut, Walter Gropius, and the Bauhaus legacy at Harvard, Virginia: University of Virginia Press. Mies van der Rohe Foundation (2005) European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture--Mies Van Der Rohe Award, London: Fundacio Mies van der Rohe. Read More