Contractual Agreement for an Architect in Canada - Research Paper Example

The general architect is entirely responsible for the construction in accordance with this kind of agreement and for every compensation made for the expenses and performance connected to the subcontractors. The advantages associated with kind of contractual arrangement include: A single prime deal is regularly simpler to manage since it has a centralized task for the architect and client. The transactions made by the client are transferred to one architect, reducing the possibility of confusion, unlike multiple prime contractors.

Design plans for the construction are originally arranged by a planning expert. The client then selects one architect to perform the work, following a bidding procedure grounded on the design plans. This is the most widespread of architectural deal used in Canada. This is because another major advantage lays in the plans and requirements being prepared by design experts turning out to be part of the bidding credentials. This way, the client is bound to receive high quality outcomes of the construction from the contractors (Quatman and Dhar 342). . 2.

Design-build contractual agreement The Design-build agreement is an accord between a client and an architectural firm that offers design and building services (Hopper 134). An expansion of this kind of contract is a “turnkey” project where the contractor gets project funding, acquires land, offers blueprint and construction services, and delivers the final product to the client, available for occupancy. The advantages of using this kind of contractual agreement include: Saving time, an aspect of the sort of contract an architect might go into when offering archetypal Design-Bid-Build services.

Nevertheless, time is not considered a major factor in architecture in comparison with the expenses, construction and quality of the project. The association with a quick track program, able to eliminate the possibility of incorporated designs. The programs frequently imply that each period of the building phase is spent with the occupants to determine their requirements in the new building (OAA 2011). When the designer operates for the builder, instead of working directly for the client, checks and balances existing in other techniques’ are mislaid.

The architect and contractor’s engineer, otherwise known as the ‘clerk of the works’ in Canada, are normally depended upon to maintain the trend made by the construction. This approach of the contract assures that the builder sticks to the plans and regulations of the contract. Under such an observation, the client is guaranteed adherence and honor to the contract made with the construction organization (Quatman and Dhar 342). Certain disadvantages may arise from this kind of contractual agreement depending on the organization and builders the client has awarded.

The demerits