Archaeology Topic - Assignment Example

Archaeology Topic Cultural Heritage Management Cultural heritage management is the practice of managing cultural heritage. Cultural heritage management draws its practices from cultural conservation and restoration. Cultural heritage management concerns identifying, interpreting, and preserving significant cultural sites and the physical assets of heritage (Fiol 191).Recently there is emphasis on identifying and protecting cultural sites especially the ones located on public lands. The laws that are in place make it a crime to develop any lands without a survey on the cultural resources.

The survey on cultural resources identifies and asses cultural sites that could be affected by developing the federal land. Developing material culture and brand concepts of culture that are inseparable from the communities is essential. Culture heritage belongs to people, therefore ensuring cultural heritage is a necessity at all cost (Fiol 191). Heritage duration is important to the local people. Duration is long-term preservation of heritage assets and provision of their access in different forms.

The fragile heritage assets need to be preserved in an environment that protects them. Large museums offer such conservators for the fragile assets. Museums give culture heritage long life through preserving artifacts or through recreating a historical place that can be experienced by people. There are different forms of protecting buildings and structures that hold cultural heritage. Heritage management for buildings requires continued use of the building. Intangible cultural heritage also needs to be managed through being re-interpreted by people of the specific cultural regions.

Management of intangible cultural heritage is not easy but it is still manageable. Cultural resources are all very important and they need constant maintenance (Fiol 191).Works CitedFiol, Marlene. "Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View ofSustainable Competitive Advantage." Journal of Management 17.1 (1991): 191