Regard Plato's view of the ideal from his Allegory of the Cave - Admission/Application Essay Example

Platos view of the ideal from his Allegory of the Cave Platos Allegory of the Cave describes the difficult way towards seeking ideal and explains the importance of such seeking. Plato warns about the threat to become prisoners of our own minds. He states that we should not concentrate just on our own senses, reason is more important than senses. If we are captured by senses, we risk to fail to determine what is real and what is the product of our illusions. Every person should be able to think properly, make analysis of his own thoughts and come to the corresponding conclusion.

Knowledge is the only thing we should rely on, everything should be analyzed and proved not leaving any chances for illusions to rule. . “the man who is sharpest at making out the things that go by, and most remembers, which of them are accustomed to pass before, which after, and which at the same time as others, and who is thereby most able to divine what is going to come, in your opinion would he be desirous of them and envy those who are honored and hold power among these men?” (Plato, Republic 5 l 6d).

A man should be able to clearly explain every event, which happen, to understand every phenomenon and only then he will be powerful. In “The Allegory of the Cave” Plato explains the essence of “becoming” and “being”. He shows a man as a creature that does not know anything about the world around. When a person is born, he appears in a cave and his main task is to get out of the deepness of the cave by getting education. This is the best way to learn about life and would around, the best way to start living and end existing.

Aristotle determines rhetoric as a process or some kind of procedure, but not an output and in such a way provides a secondary characteristic, meaning that rhetoric can be understood as an abstract matter or subject. For example, the same ways of rhetoric are applied in different situations and problems points. One can refer to an example; cite an authority, draw somebody’s attention to comparison, etc., along with this, it doesn’t matter whether you are pro or contra. Both sides apply the same ways or approaches.

People’s mind is reflected in their speech. Moreover, rhetoric can be named abstract as the principal attainments of rhetoric can be used in many different situations under various circumstances. Any time one is under some circumstances which demand speech training, examining, convincing, all explanations in details, etc., one applies his or her skills of rhetoric. Thus, rhetoric is a prevalent capability that can be useful in other different spheres. According to Aristotle’s definition rhetoric can be determined as an ability to persuade and convince people under different circumstances.

Any other art can guide or convince concerning its certain study; for example, medicine concerning what is sound and unsound, arithmetic concerning numbers, and so on. But rhetoric we observe as the capability to examine the persuasion ways on factually any subject given to somebody; and that is why one says that it is not restricted to any particular or certain type of subjects. This difference between substance and form was pointed out by Aristotle as logos and lexis, or what is said and how consequently.

The Allegory of the Cave from The Republic represents a very valuable work. It emphasizes the importance of education in our life. Plato wants us to understand that it is much more useful to stay in motion ignoring the motionless world of illusions. The person who came out of a cave wants to tell others what he learned. If a person wants to achieve something in his life, he should be active, set the goals and achieve them not allowing dreams and illusions to capture his mind. In “On Rhetoric”, Aristotle refers logos to “proofs available in the words, arguments, or logic of a speech” (Herrick, 1998).

Eventually, though, this difference proved indefensible, founded on in terms of language as little more than the ways by which one shares one’s views and failing to take into consideration the indivisibility of concepts and the language applied to depict them. In fact, how one uses things is accurately the way in which one guarantees that one’s hoped-for concept has been communicated to other people, so there may be no passing on of views and concepts without taking into consideration lexis as well.

ReferencesPlato. (2007)."The Allegory of the Cave" (from Republic). The Human Experience: Core 1101115 Coursepack. Valparaiso University. Southlake, TX: Fountainhead Press, 41-47 .Aristotle. (1991). On Rhetoric, A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford