The author of the paper states that humans are capable of digesting plant and animal sources and have a wide range of choices when it comes to eating, but being omnivorous doesn’t mean that all possible edible items are acceptable foodstuffs. This is the omnivore’s paradox or the omnivore’s dilemma…
Download file to see previous pages...
Choice gives us ‘autonomy, freedom, adaptability’ (Fischler 1988), but we must incorporate variety, because of ‘An omnivore, unlike a specialized eater, cannot obtain all the nutrients it needs from one food’ (Fischler 1988). The healthy human diet depends on diversity, but our paradox is that to stay healthy, humans must remain suspicious of possibly dangerous substances. The dilemma follows: we must orally incorporate sustenance, but, as Rozin reminds us, ‘it is not possible to specify in advance what sensory properties will characterize sources of nutrition (or toxins) in any particular environment (Rozin 1987). Thus, it was historically important that humans learn patterns of rejecting potentially poisonous food prior to allowing it to breach the barrier of the mouth.
Modern eaters seldom face this aspect of the dilemma. Humans have already identified the edible and inedible substances in their environment. Food can be contaminated or spoiled, and ‘All domestic animals are potentially hazardous to human health’ (Harris 1998), but modern cooks are usually aware of how to store, prepare, and cook to eliminate this problem. Prepared food has symbolic magic qualities as “the mythical representation of nature-culture transformation’ (Falk 1991). Food is removed from a raw, untamed state and made edible in a symbolic cultural sense. How can we reject it when it has clearly been made—transformed—into food? There is nothing inherently wrong with it.
Humans have learned they can eat bitter foods like coffee and that even painful foods like chiles have beneficial effects, such that they ‘delay food spoilage...make the dwellers of scorching climates sweat in a way that cools them off…supply essential micronutrients and protective antioxidants’ (Nabhan 2004).
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Omnivores Disgust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1500728-anthropology-essay-please-assign-writer-3700
(The Omnivores Disgust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“The Omnivores Disgust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1500728-anthropology-essay-please-assign-writer-3700.
Lacto-vegetarians do not eat meat, seafood and eggs but they eat dairy foods and plant foods. Vegans are pure vegetarians; they eat only plant foods and avoid consuming dairy products, meat, seafood and eggs. Some essential nutrients are important part of diet such as proteins, minerals, carbohydrates, fats and vitamins.
Therefore an enlightening document on food values and proper diet supplement is very essential. At the same time, the representation or the captivation of the thoughts into a very straightforward and lucid language is demanding as well. The book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals” by Michael Pollan is a very enlightening and notifying document published in 2006.
To justify the Omnivore’s Dilemma in human nature and choice of meals, Pollan investigates the entire food habits of Americans or American way of eating. To investigate and analyze the entire food chains of human food habit, Pollan throws an in-depth light on each of the food chains initiating from the industrial food to the final source of the final meal.
Food chains are usually applied in ecological modelling, which provides a continuous variable for measuring the passage of energy through various linear linkages from the lowest to the highest trophic feeding levels. Long food chain lengths are unstable with increasing length increases with the ecosystem size and reduction of energy at every successive level.
Omnivore’s Dilemma Name Course Professor Date Omnivore’s Dilemma The book, Omnivore Dilemma was authored by Michael Pollan in 2006. The book focuses on several themes that touch on human beings’ way of life. Major aspects brought out include the kinds of food and their sources, as well as the people’s views on the food.
The paper is against the abolishment of corn because it is a substantial contributor of the world economy. Corn provides man with flour which provides a meal in many third world countries such as Africa who depend on flour as their staple food.
What influences a person’s or a community’s eating habits regarding the kinds of food they eat? Critics argue that kinds of food we eat are influenced by attitude; others believe that it is situational circumstances that influence the kinds of food a person eats. The debate can go on and on presenting several reasons as to why people choose to eat certain kinds of food.
king this prediction about the conventional wisdom, Pollan has tried to exaggerate the claims he has made in his book, like as if he has come up with an altogether unexplored knowledge area.
Corn is a fundamental source of American diet, and this is known to every American with