Reading Response - Book Report/Review Example

The other discussion focuses on Margaret Mead’s argument regarding sexuality as psychological, whereby she focuses on a thesis of development in sex and temperament as a human behavior, which can be changed and influenced by cultural environment that can determine a person's character. Nevertheless, this paper will focus on presenting a review of the article "Sexuality at stake: The essentialist and constructionist approaches to sexuality in anthropology" by Jan Lofstrom. The other argument is derived from information gathered from scholars such as Sherry Ortenr and Harriet Whitehead, who have focused on introducing the agenda for future research on sexuality in anthropology.

Apparently, they present a cultural and social processes regarding cultural variation of sex and gender notions that are not theorized in a systematic way. The article also interprets the institutionalization of gender crossing among American native people by The Berdache Institution (Lofstrom, 5). Lastly, the article presents a discussion regarding the solutions to essentialism vs. constructionism controversy in regard to sexuality; in fact, this discussion is derived from arguments from other scholars, whose arguments have been presented in the article.

Some of the strengths of the reading can be attributed to use of very informative sources from which they gather pertinent ideas. For instance, the article has built its discussion by citing other scholars and researchers such as Bronislaw Malinowski, Margaret Mead, Sherry Ortenr and Harriet Whitehead. The ideas are presented in a very comprehensive way to facilitate understanding of the main line of arguments, and this offers an interpretation, which can be considered convincing. On the other hand, this article offers a substantial evaluation of arguments made by different scholars on issues regarding sexuality; in fact, these ideas are compared is a way that readers can understand and gather significant information.

The other source of strength is indicated by the numerous sources from which this article has gathered information as indicated by the reference list. In fact, this is a clear indication that the article has developed arguments based on sufficient literature review, which enables gathering of relevant information regarding the topic of sexuality. Nevertheless, the article has a weakness of being highly comprehensive, thereby leading to chances of readers missing the main line of argumentation at some point.

On the same point, this weakness may lead to interpretations based on the understanding, which is prone to be influenced by different perceptions created by the article towards the topic of sexuality from various authors. The ideas gathered from different researchers and scholars can lead to confusion, through the article focuses on following a particular line of argumentation in all of its critique. Furthermore, the topic of sexuality is a very controversial topic, which has been faced by different perception by various researchers; hence, there are reduced chances of understanding the best perception leading to a misconception.

Moreover, it is evident that due to sophistication of the arguments presented by each researcher and scholar who has been assessed in this article; the arguments seem to be winding in a way that makes it hard for the reader to follow. This article developed a significant relationship