The last scene, unlike the beginning of the film, can be said to be one of the sweetest scenes in the film. The scene completely goes the opposite of the dramatic and chaotic first scene. This last scene shows the importance of Miss Froy as the main character, a British spy, unlike the first scene. The cricket fans who at first gave the impression of being patriots when they were so eager to go back home; only to be unveiled later they wanted to watch a cricket match. The closing scene completely brings a new order into the story. The superiority of the Britons, as portrayed in the opening scene is still maintained at the closing scene. The opening scene presented expectations of fewer thrillers and more humor. The closing scene brings drama and thrills to the movie with slight modifications of the expectations of the characters at the beginning.
The plot of the film gives detailed information on the story of the film. Generally, the plot evokes a sense of suspense by giving the audience too little information. When Miss Froy goes missing, the audience cannot tell what the lady suddenly goes missing especially with no one’s knowledge. It is also peculiar, that right before the British passengers board the train, Iris is knocked on the head with a brick meant for Miss Froy. In both scenes, it has not yet come clear to the audience why Miss Froy is being targeted. The range of narration of the film can therefore be described as unrestricted. There is suspense created within the plot with some instances where the audience knows more than the character themselves. This is clear when the protagonist (Iris) wakes up from a blackout to find Miss Froy missing. While all the other strangers claim not to know of her whereabouts or have seen her, the audience already knows that she was there. The same is the case when Dr. Harz’s conspirator walks in dressed in Miss Froy’s clothes and has a patient bandaged up. The audience can clearly tell that the doctor has a hand in the lady’s disappearance though Iris and Gilbert have no clue at this point.
The plot of the film the lady vanishes also gives an objective narration depth. This is because the film does not give the spectator much insight into the thought of the characters but rather, there is an observational role for the spectator. This is portrayed by the suspense that is created when the characters do not reveal they're true intentions. It was only during the shootout that Miss Froy confessed to Gilbert and Iris that she was working as a British spy. Not once has the film portrayed Miss Froy in that role either through her thoughts or her actions. The objectivity is also evident in the character of Dr. Hartz who only confessed to being the perpetrator of Miss Froy’s disappearance thinking that Iris and Gilbert were going to die. The film does not at any instance put his role as a perpetrator. The intentions of Miss Froy and Dr. Hartz were only known to them.
The lady vanishes has a very clear way of showing causality between the events, from the first scene to the last scene of the film. This is evident in the scene where the passengers cannot travel to their various destinations and are at the end left to be congested in that hotel. The characterization of the characters all starts in this venue. This sets up the skills and knowledge of each of the characters. The other scene where causality can be seen is the scene after a train is made available to the passengers.
I this scene, just before Iris and Miss Froy board the train, Iris is hit by a flower vase that causes her to blackout after which Miss Froy helps her out into the train. The character of Miss Froy is portrayed as a kind and loyal citizen. This scene sets up the link between the disappearance of Miss Froy and the involvement of Iris in the search for Miss Froy. The scene also reveals the motive for the main story: the disappearance of Miss Froy. If the vase was indeed intended for the lady them it would be logical to say that the abduction of the lady was as a result of the vase having missed.
Read More