Download file to see previous pages...
Nowadays, the situation is not different. This is evident in televisions, billboards and magazines where men and women with ‘perfect’ bodies are used to advertise goods and services. Through this concept, we can conclude that ancient man and modern man are not different. However, using modern culture to explain a past culture may not be entirely reliable. First of all, there are special cultures that were totally different from us. Take for instance the Egyptians. They were not affected by peak shift and did not see the need to design unrealistic human forms.
Secondly, all artists are different. Though they are connected by the desire to create art, artisans differ in many ways; for example they have different sources of inspiration, what works for one might not work for the other. The sources of inspiration for ancient artists are not the same as modern artists. It is therefore not plausible to use modern art to try to decipher ancient art.
Prehistoric paintings are not depictions of shamanic trance visions. The paintings were based on creatures that were present the time like horses and reindeer that were in existence in Europe. These were creatures that were either eaten, used or seen by the ancient man. It is worth noting that different archeological sites had different set of animal paintings. The paintings in Europe comprised animals that were there at the time, Africa had its own set of animals and paintings, as was the rest of the world. If they were trance visions, then we could expect paintings of alien creatures in various archeological sites. For instance, we could expect to find paintings of American animals in African sites.
No, it does not. It is difficult o deduce this issue due to the amount of time that separates modern times and the prehistoric times. No amount of thinking will enable us to know what made them start
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Play Interviewer: I’m glad to hear from you. Actually the type of work I do presently is a form of self employment. I would really love to spend most of my time in the field, probably playing crickets and any other form of activity that would keep me fit and fresh like football.
This study discovers the Peter Smith and Keith Schmidt in the context of contemporary art. It's clear that Peter Smith has a background in the art world, as well as a vested interest in the success of the MCA. Likewise, Peter Smith is indicated to have a history of success in the contemporary art world. It's noted that he has been successful.
The previous director has assumed a management structure from an individual with a long history at the institution and shifted the museum’s focus from one largely entrenched in scholarly and university concerns to one with a more
I can suppose that in the further perspective of the painting the same pillars are decorated with the same burden of the modern consumerism artifacts. The artist challenges the audience with his painting, because we may think about our future,
As explained in the case video, the documentary provides the usefulness of using the comparison strategy and also questions its applicability (Spivey, 1st to 15th minute). For instance, the documentary quotes that 30,000 years ago, civilizations started to make images. In the
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Case Study on topic THE ORIGINS OF ART for FREE!