We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

An analysis of 12 angry men - Essay Example

Comments (0)
The plot of 12 Angry Men revolves around jury deliberations for 18-yr-old Young Man, referred to as "The Accused," who is on trial for the pre-meditated murder of his father. The movie starts off with the Judge instructing the jury regarding the procedure of deliberation…
Download full paper
An analysis of 12 angry men
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
An analysis of 12 angry men

Download file to see previous pages... An analysis of "12 angry men"

Note how the leadership in the movie depend on that which Aristotle had previously given . Also note that Aristotle's formation of rhetoric makes it a component of every human effort, apart from (perhaps) those aspects of technical discussion which are so famous as to be established practically without question.
In groups, large or small, the identity and make up of who becomes the leader and who becomes the follower is difficult to explain. In the case of the movie "Twelve Angry Men," the small group is the jury and the verdict they have to find. There is an underlying assumption that the jury will judge their fellow man fairly and without any personal bias. However the imperfections of man make this process less than perfect. It is here, when emotions and logic are inserted into the thought process, that conflict, doubt and questioning of motives start to occur.

When the leader, in this case the foreman, takes charge we see his influence and power over the other members of the group (jury) start to take place and eventually the power shifts to another individual, in this case another jury member, an architect. On first look, the jury probably would have unanimously voted for conviction, however, as the discussion progressed, the architect gets the rest of the members to question their quick decision. While the foreman was relying on his legitimate place of power as the foreman, the architect keeps the group talking and discussing the facts of the case, and listening to each other. The foreman stayed focused and kept the discussion going and wanted all voting procedures to be fair, while the architect used rationality and logic and wanted the others to discuss their way to a still unanimous decision, but better defended. The fear of disappointing the group is stronger than perhaps their own judgment, and after the vote was not unanimous for a guilty verdict, each member tried to convince the architect, the dissenting vote, as to why they feel the suspect is guilty. After much discussion, another vote is taken, only this time it is done by secret ballot, and eventually it comes back with another unanimous decision.
However, this time it is opposite of its original position: not guilty, here we find Aristotle's leadership rhetoric plays an essential role here as in this scenario as the foreman bases his leadership on Aristotle's rhetoric of leadership he strongly believes that truth needs protection exactly like the perpetration of wrongs. The bad guys will defiantly make use rhetoric...why should the good guys be powerless There is a political sense in this theory too: right thinking leaders like the jury and foreman, those who have well of the most in mind, ought to be able to take effective leadership action like the jury and foreman did in the movie (and must do so).
When the group was assembled in the jury room they were polite, organized and civil to each other. They very well knew what their responsibility was as well as they collectively were thinking this was a precise case. The expectations which most of the members of jury were that a decision of guilty would be reached quite promptly and all of them would be able to leave. Compliance with this norm was first evident with the first vote taken, only one of the jury members voted for a guilty verdict. No one wanted to disappoint the group.
All of the jury's leadership strengths seem to again reflect Aristotle's leade ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Social Psychological Perspective of Movie 12 Angry Men
This dramatic representation of what occurs on a hot afternoon in a jury room following a disturbing murder case in which a young boy faces life in prison or execution does not contain any of the flashy car chases or steamy love scenes that its competitors offered to audiences, but it does offer a great deal of insight into the workings of the human mind as it functions in relation to others.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
12 angry men film analysis
12 Angry Men Introduction The movie “12 Angry Men” (1957) by Brian Rathjen, deals with a case of capital murder involving a youth of Spanish- American dissent. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Character Review from the Movie 12 Angry Men
Juror 8, is one of twelve men, each coming from different backgrounds, careers, prejudices and beliefs, asked to judge one of their peers. The defendant is an 18-year old kid who allegedly has killed his father with a switchblade knife, in a heated fight.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
12 Angry Men
ions for Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay.1 In the years following, the film has not seen much additional success, but has maintained a firm grip on its position as social commentary and innovative production techniques as it did
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
12 angry men movie
It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
12 angry men
He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
12 Angry Men
The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Analysis Summary of the movie 12 Angry Men using group dynamics
The setting is a room boiling in the summer heat with no air-conditioning except for a small fan and some windows. As the temperature rises the intensity of the situation begins to unfold. The story line provides examples
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
12 Angry men
The discussion took an interesting turn for a serious debate that provided several examples of constructive and destructive argument methods in the process. The discussion also identified many reasoning errors in the decision making of the jurors and this paper will
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Movie Analysis: 12 Angry Men
A variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. The main character is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous". This portrays the organizational behavior he familiarizes himself with socially.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic An analysis of 12 angry men for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us