A group of select industrial countries in North America, Europe, Oceanic and Japan is Scandinavia and India used to illustrate the dynamics and transformation system of medical records from manual to electronic.MethodologyThe methodology that is used analyzes the global, regional and national implementation rates of the electronic health records systems. The review is made based on how the different governments’ role in making sure that the system is a success. Also, physicians’ attitudes towards the system were used as part of the review process.
FindingsThe findings of the study were that the implemented EHRS are faced with a lot of challenges even if there are some subsequent benefits (include Reference). The system is prone to transcribing (include reference) errors that the user may not understand and address. The errors may be transferred to the patient’s medical results: a process that is likely to compromises the patient’s safety. There is also, the likelihood that people using the system may not fully embrace it (Vanek et al., 2016). According to study findings, while significant efforts have been made by various governments to encourage of EHRSs, enormous challenges (standardization, programming glitches, system failures, the vulnerability of patient records, confidentiality, other internal and external factors)continue to slow down the process.
There is a global absence of instituting an effective and inclusive team to contribute to the design and development of EHRSs. Inadequate oversight has also impacted implementation processes. Denmark remains a trailblazer in efforts to computerize manual medical records.DiscussionInnovations come with relative risks. The MMRs are no exception. And in this case, the challenges are even more exacerbated by the involvement of different players at the various stages of the transformation process.
Potential setbacks range from human errors to computer system breakdowns to uncontrolled external factors.
...Download file to see next pages Read More