Effects of Industrial Production on People and Things - Term Paper Example

Effects of Industrial Production on People and Things Introduction The emergence of industrial production has resulted to industrial technology impacting on people’s lives and the environment. It has resulted to vital changes in the organization of a factory. The consideration of the impact of computer expertise on the industrial world needs appreciation for defining characteristics of industrialized technology and the kind of production work an organization performs. The paper tries to analyze the effects of industrial production on people and things. Effects of Industrial Production on People and Things Industrial technology has altered the social and economic arrangement of the contemporary world in different ways. It has distorted in a drastic fashion the setting of work and communication environment and conferred an exceptional material prosperity to contemporary societies (Hunziker, 2001, 345). This evolution has resulted in many social effects. Technological advancements and other communal and institutional elements have contributed in all these changes in the contemporary industrial evolution with all features linked to it. Industrial technology has made a mark by its distinctive contribution to the world (Benkler, 2006, 290). Industrial expertise and the computerization of work has brought about changes and replaced handicrafts. Before the surfacing of industrialized systems of manufacture, technical work was performed by individuals. These workshops had few skilled craftsmen in different fields. Artisan skills in the diverse aspects of craftsmanship were learnt after some years of apprenticeship and a long duration of handy involvement. It is apparent that the productivity of the workshop was limited because of the uncondusive conditions (Janes, 2004, 276). The radical transformation brought about by industrialism introduced major changes in   craftsmanship production. Industrial machinery represent the industrial age as computers signify the new era of technological information. Mechanized production of outputs resulted to a steady and impressive organizational achievement of industrial entrepreneurship. Mass production encouraged mechanized operations and made employees a simple partner in the manufacturing process (Dean, 2001, 456). Industrial expertise involves a closed structure of steps and administration that leads its own association. The industrial advancement of mass manufacture reduces the purpose and responsibility of an employee in the production structure into a subsidiary position (Mosley, 2011, 456). In the industrialized age, the tool employee becomes an appliance manager as the artisan transform into a worker. The essential strategy of industrialized technology is releasing production from its reliance on skilful artisans and substituting their contributions in the industrial world by an automated system of production (Milberg, 2004, 324). The system is capable of achieving its goals little structured human aid. This explains the standardization consistent production work related to large industrial companies. The effectiveness and subsequent command of mass production system have its founding on certain critical presuppositions that are mostly ignored. Mass production results to a high level of standardization, in productivity and the vital processes that result to production of an output. The level of standardization that has been caused by the surfacing and dominance of mass production is due to technological advancement. The large manufactured products symbolize the framing skill of an ordinary individual (Kozmetsky, 2005, 298). Technology is primarily responsible for the disappearance of delight and pride of work and limitation of its social personality. As a result of manufacturing technology, the role designated for individuals was transformed into a mere achievement of the already established objectives and standardized output. The prosperity of expenditure, as caused by mass production has a negative influence causing drastic alteration of work together with diminution of multidimensional elements (Bloom, 2009, 234). The evolution from handicrafts to mass production in industrial systems is a comprising reason that affects an organization structure and its method of achieving the set objectives. Different organizations use varied technology. The surfacing of large-scale production in an organization related to the industrial age has been affected by the industrial infrastructure of the pre-industrial era. Archetypal organizational elements of industrial companies and organizations such as mass production, distribution of labor, computerization of work and centralized decision-making of a company results to industrial technology. The association of technology to the work structure is substantiated traditionally by the organization theory that states the effects of industrial technologies and its influence on the configuration and operation of industrial organizations. This has been caused by technological advancements in the evolving world. A firm involved in mass production, concentrating on producing the same products for various undisclosed consumers, differs from organizations producing their output products to identified consumers in making their products. Nevertheless, technology has resulted to a number of constraints that require immediate identification and solution. This promotes healthy relationship in establishing of goals, industrial infrastructure and organization in the work place. Organization theory outlines three universal types of manufacturing technologies such as process production industries and mass production industries. The three technological inventions define different organization and their operations. Mass production is positively connected to large firms and homogeneous and hierarchical companies (Milberg, 2004, 543). Small-scale production forms its basis from traditions of artisans that made products for a precise group of clients. Firms using this technological perception are pressured to avoid irreparable technological policies, so as to satisfy the various customers’ demands. Small scale production is exactly their method of adapting the produce of output in order to meet the requirements of consumers (Dean, 2001, 456). Process companies, attribute their, owe their reduced centralized managerial structure to the computerization of its operations. The process helps to curb human intervention at work hence relocating human effort to other roles in the industry. The significant finding is that mechanization is not connected to organizational arrangement in a similar and explicit fashion. More computerization on the operations of the company does not result to better centralized and consistent organizations. Regardless of various empirical researches the connection between technology advancement and organizational configuration is definite (Janes, 2004, 367). Whereas there are many ties between technology and social scheme, technology and work association it can be accounted for historically, by allowing for development of different types of organizations structure.   It is important to note that general view in the organization theory and supervision is that technological advancement is as a result of many variables. This is because the environment, intended market, managerial size and produce diversification greatly impacts on the organizational feature. This is because it defines people’s roles and affiliation. The supposition that technology requires understanding from a wider perspective does not make sense. Technology, computer and new information expertise in particular impose a change and alter the entire framework of managerial activity (Mosley, 2011, 456). This makes it possible to create fresh relationships between employees and administrators. This also encourages a connection between the firm the total working environment. The historical perspective outlines the industrial implications of technology on companies and firms regardless of their divergent views. Technological expertise is accumulated practice and understanding as it symbolizes an incorporated system of awareness and interaction and communiqué that explains basic elements of daily activities in an organization. Technology is all not about predefined methods of modernism and efficient production. This is important when dealing with contemporary technological advancements that are related to industrial and information technology (Milberg, 2004, 189). Technology has led to globalization and interaction hence resulting to industrial production in companies. It has impacted on the operations and workers in a firm as it encourages interaction and integration among the workers in a firm. The process has significant effects on the surroundings, culture, economic expansion and prosperity of the company. This to a greater extent affects the whole life of an individual. The surfacing of technology predominantly the methods those technological inventions are integrating most companies worldwide. This is because companies are able to share information hence increasing its production output. It is essential to outline the implication of industrial production in the existing world. This is because of the impacts on people and the environment. The benefits of mass industrial cannot be overlooked because of technological inventions (Benkler, 2006, 254). Conclusion Technology in the industrial sector has brought along changes thus influencing the lives of individuals, and the environment is not as the results of the changes taking place in the industrial world. Without fresh information and communiqué technologies industrial production would be nonexistent as this has encouraged major changes in the production industry. The entire production process depends largely on new information and technological advancement. This necessitates the need for more technological usage and exploration so as to increase the production output and the quality of service. Although Technology is not a solution to all industrial production challenges, the availability of vital information is necessary for economic growth and social integration in industries. This defines the significant role information and technologies play in inspiring development and industrial production in the long run. List of references Benkler, Y. (2006), The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom, New York,Yale University Press. Bloom, N. (2009), The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research. Dean, J. M. (2001), International trade and the environment, London, Ashgate. Hunziker, J. R., & Jones, T. O. (2001), Product liability and innovation managing risk in an uncertain environment, New York, National Academy Press. Janes, D. A. (2004), Economies of justice: Workers and labor reformers in late-Victorian Canadian industrial fiction, New York, Cengage. Kozmetsky, G., & Yue, P. (2005), The economic transformation of the United States, 1950- 2000: focusing on the technological revolution, the service sector expansion, and the cultural, ideological, and demographic changes, New York, Purdue University Press. Meyer, U. B., & Creux, S. E. (2007), Process oriented analysis: design and optimization of industrial production systems, London, CRC/Taylor & Francis. Milberg, W. S. (2004), Labor and the globalization of production: causes and consequences of industrial upgrading. London, Palgrave Macmillan. Mosley, L. (2011), Labor rights and multinational production, New York, Cambridge University Press. ustrial fiction, New York, Cengage. Weeks, J. R. (2002), Population: an introduction to concepts and issues, London, Wadsworth Pub. Read More