The Power of Algorithm - Report Example

The Power of Algorithm Name Course The Power of Algorithm The communication process has experienced immeasurable and considerable growth, which has influenced the information analysis processes. The existence of big data has enhanced the viability of existent data as the data develops numerous capacities rendering the data richer (Cramer, 2013). Big data enhances the existence data capacity, which influences the development of several levels of data analysis. Through big data, individuals develop the capacity to integrate both individual and collective data analysis processes. The integration of varied data analysis processes enhances the viability levels attached to the existent communication processes (Fu, Chan and Chau, 2013). Big data enhances the communication processes at it influences the development of an enhanced level of uniqueness pertaining to the existent data. Big data remains instrumental in the information search process as it influences the level of detail and refinement experienced pertaining to the provided data. The identification of high detail remains instrumental in the provision of quality observations relating to the search process. The social network analysis influences the information search process through the identification of the existent networks and nodes that influence the identification of an existent relationship among the elements (Cramer, 2013). The nodes influence the identification of the existent links, which remain instrumental in the identification of the possible relationships between the individual’s network and the form of data incorporated in the process. An algorithm identifies a set of rules and instructions that guide a computer in the process integrated with solving a specific problem (Cramer, 2013). Algorithms have developed into vital components of the search process incorporated among the majority of search engines. Algorithms remain instrumental in the provision of solutions pertaining to developed questions on internet platforms. The utilization of algorithms influences the identification of various forms of information shared through the internet (Cramer, 2013). Algorithms operate as gatekeepers, which influence individual’s access to the available information. There exist several algorithms that influence the search process including page rank (Google) and edge rank (facebook). Algorithms influence the classification of the existent results pertaining to a developed question. Through algorithms, the classification process influences the search process as the search integrates terms related to the search process. In addition, the algorithms guide the search process to ensure that information relevant to the search remains displayed (Cramer, 2013). Algorithms remain instrumental to the process as they limit the provision of unwanted information through the integration of the filter process. For instance, page rank influences the search process through the classification of the most important information relating to the integrated search. Page rank enhances the search process as it influences the identification of the important and factual information pertaining to the process (Lee, Liu & Li, 2013). Algorithms influence the search process through the development of element relationships. The identification of the existent relationships pertaining to the process influences the provision of desired results pertaining to the search process. As identified, algorithms influence the search process adopted on the Internet via the search engines. The development of algorithms influences the communication and information search processes adopted in varied communities and governments (Cramer, 2013). The study seeks to integrate an analysis of the influence of algorithms on the information search tensions experienced across the globe in liberal and authoritarian societies. In addition, the study seeks to identify the influence of algorithms to broadcast and participatory media. Through the analysis, the study seeks to identify the impact of algorithms incorporated in the search engines to issues affecting the media including surveillance, transparency and democracy. The role of the Public Sphere in Liberal and Authoritarian Societies Liberal and authoritarian societies incorporate varied rules and restrictions pertaining to the existent algorithms incorporate in the online search process. The online search process seeks to influence the provision of information across varied spheres relating to the selected search processes (Cramer, 2013). Liberal societies place emphasis on the provision of information freedom across all forms of media. Therefore, in liberal societies, the algorithms adopted pertaining to the search engine processes limit the levels of filtration incorporated as the search process seeks to yield the stipulated results. The levels of filtration experienced pertaining to the developed algorithms related to the relevance of the search results provided (Fu, Chan & Chau, 2013). The algorithms seek to ensure that the data provided remains relevant and applicable to the search process. Authoritarian societies place emphasis on the level of form of information relayed to the public. In most instances, authoritarian form of governments incorporate processes that seek to limit the level of information provided to the population. The measures integrated seek to limit the possibility of demonstrations and uprising pertaining to the existent models and forms of government (Van Dijck, 2012). Therefore, in the majority of authoritarian societies, the algorithms pertaining to the search engines are alerted to filter further the information provided to the population. However, the alteration process adopted by the system pertaining to the algorithm delimits the freedom of speech and information as any forms of inciting messages are eliminated from the search platform. The existence of legislative measures in authoritarian societies that monitor the search process identifies the increasing levels of tension experienced pertaining to the relay of information to the public (Cramer, 2013). China identifies an example of an authoritarian society that seeks to monitor and regulate internet usage within the country’s territory and population. The authoritarian government in place seeks to ensure that the communication and information processes provided in the country enhance group cohesion as opposed to conflict developing from different ideas incorporated (Stieglitz 6 dang Yuan, 2013). The Chinese government has incorporated firewalls and logarithms pertaining to the existent internet search processes geared towards limiting the integration of Western ideas and concepts among the population. In addition, the regulations integrated pertaining to internet and information access seeks to limit the development of any form of uprisings in the population. The level of algorithm control has developed into a vital factor in the Chinese society, which has influenced the regulation of the search engines and social networks utilized in the population. Increased regulation of the processes has influenced the withdrawal of some of the search engines from the market including Google (Lee, Liu ^ Li, 2013). Increased restrictions placed on the existent search engines have led to the development of Chinese search engines and social networks that adhere to the developed legal structures regulating social networks. However, the development of unfavorable internet regulation laws identify the level of tension experienced pertaining to the provision of the necessary level of information. In addition, the development of restrictive policies among authoritarian societies influences the development of high tension among the authoritarian and liberal societies. The liberal societies maintain that individuals have the right to access information thus the provision of restrictions on information access and free speech delimits the existent human rights pertaining to the process. Broadcast and Participatory Media Broadcast media involves the use of audio and visual models in relaying information such as radio and TV. Broadcast media identifies a vital element of the communication process as they influence the relay of the required information to the audience. Participatory media influences the development of information processes that remain interactive and applicable to all the parties involved in the communication process (Cramer, 2013). For instance, the development of social media provides an interactive platform for individuals that influence the exchange of ideas pertaining to the communication process. Through the utilization various social media platforms such as Twitter, the communication and information sharing process remains interactive and in real-time. Participatory media remains instrumental in the knowledge-sharing process as it influences the information exchange process over varied durations. In contrast, broadcast media limits the level of audience participation in certain critical factors affecting the society. Algorithm usage influences the participatory media processes as it influences the information search and relay processes. The existence of social media platforms with limited filtering in the algorithms enhances the exchange of opinions and views pertaining to varied communication processes (Lee, Liu & Li, 2013). However, in the event of broadcast journalism, the information relayed necessitates filtering, which delimits the communication process. Therefore, the power of algorithms incorporates a direct relationship to broadcast and participatory media as it influences the level of information provided pertaining to the process. The integration of restrictive algorithms delimit the information search and sharing process while the integration of liberal algorithm processes enhances the knowledge sharing capacity experienced in media. Relationship between Algorithm and varied Media Effects Surveillance Algorithms identify gatekeepers that influence the level of information accessed by individuals in the population. Therefore, algorithms influence the surveillance processes incorporated by governments. In authoritarian communities, surveillance identifies a vital aspect of the community (Cramer, 2013). Therefore, authoritarian governments may use algorithms as an avenue to enhance the surveillance processes incorporated among internet and social media usage. For instance, China has developed an intricate surveillance system that seeks to analyze the content integrated with the specific social media platforms and consequent removal of any form of content considered detrimental to the society’s well-being. In this case, algorithms are utilized as avenues that delimit the freedom of speech provided to individuals through the social media platforms. In addition, algorithms are utilized as an avenue to track activists who seek to initiate protests geared towards enhancing the integration of democracy. Democracy Democracy develops its basis on the provision of equal levels of freedom among all individuals in the society. Liberal forms of government maintain high levels of democracy while authoritarian forms of governments delimit the level of democracy experienced among the citizens (Lee, Liu & Li, 2013). For instance, access to the internet and information identifies a basic human right as it influences individual access to knowledge. However, the majority of authoritarian societies delimit citizens access to the internet through the development of algorithms that sift through the provided content. The integration of regulation mechanisms pertaining to information search processes delimits individual freedom to knowledge. In addition, authoritarian societies incorporate high regulatory processes that stipulate the topics that should not be incorporated in social media conversations. The integration of similar limitations curtails the individual’s freedom of speech and expression as provided in the global human rights. However, the majority of citizens in such societies such as China maintain that the integration of such algorithms seeks to protect the government and limit the levels of transparency integrated by the government. Therefore, algorithms may enhance to restrain the communication processes experienced by citizens in different societies. References Cramer, B. W. (2013). The two Internet Freedoms: Framing victimhood for political gain. International Journal of Communication, 7, 20. Fu, K. W., Chan, C. H., & Chau, M. (2013). Assessing censorship on microblogs in China: Discriminatory keyword analysis and the real-name registration policy. Internet Computing, IEEE, 17(3), 42-50. Lee, J. A., Liu, C. Y., & Li, W. (2013). Searching for Internet freedom in China: A case study on Google's China experience. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 31(2). Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277-1291. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. Read More

Page rank enhances the search process as it influences the identification of the important and factual information pertaining to the process (Lee, Liu & Li, 2013). Algorithms influence the search process through the development of element relationships. The identification of the existent relationships pertaining to the process influences the provision of desired results pertaining to the search process. As identified, algorithms influence the search process adopted on the Internet via the search engines.

The development of algorithms influences the communication and information search processes adopted in varied communities and governments (Cramer, 2013). The study seeks to integrate an analysis of the influence of algorithms on the information search tensions experienced across the globe in liberal and authoritarian societies. In addition, the study seeks to identify the influence of algorithms to broadcast and participatory media. Through the analysis, the study seeks to identify the impact of algorithms incorporated in the search engines to issues affecting the media including surveillance, transparency and democracy.

The role of the Public Sphere in Liberal and Authoritarian Societies Liberal and authoritarian societies incorporate varied rules and restrictions pertaining to the existent algorithms incorporate in the online search process. The online search process seeks to influence the provision of information across varied spheres relating to the selected search processes (Cramer, 2013). Liberal societies place emphasis on the provision of information freedom across all forms of media. Therefore, in liberal societies, the algorithms adopted pertaining to the search engine processes limit the levels of filtration incorporated as the search process seeks to yield the stipulated results.

The levels of filtration experienced pertaining to the developed algorithms related to the relevance of the search results provided (Fu, Chan & Chau, 2013). The algorithms seek to ensure that the data provided remains relevant and applicable to the search process. Authoritarian societies place emphasis on the level of form of information relayed to the public. In most instances, authoritarian form of governments incorporate processes that seek to limit the level of information provided to the population.

The measures integrated seek to limit the possibility of demonstrations and uprising pertaining to the existent models and forms of government (Van Dijck, 2012). Therefore, in the majority of authoritarian societies, the algorithms pertaining to the search engines are alerted to filter further the information provided to the population. However, the alteration process adopted by the system pertaining to the algorithm delimits the freedom of speech and information as any forms of inciting messages are eliminated from the search platform.

The existence of legislative measures in authoritarian societies that monitor the search process identifies the increasing levels of tension experienced pertaining to the relay of information to the public (Cramer, 2013). China identifies an example of an authoritarian society that seeks to monitor and regulate internet usage within the country’s territory and population. The authoritarian government in place seeks to ensure that the communication and information processes provided in the country enhance group cohesion as opposed to conflict developing from different ideas incorporated (Stieglitz 6 dang Yuan, 2013).

The Chinese government has incorporated firewalls and logarithms pertaining to the existent internet search processes geared towards limiting the integration of Western ideas and concepts among the population. In addition, the regulations integrated pertaining to internet and information access seeks to limit the development of any form of uprisings in the population. The level of algorithm control has developed into a vital factor in the Chinese society, which has influenced the regulation of the search engines and social networks utilized in the population.

Read More