In social work, groups serve to support as well as maximise the psychosocial functioning and patient together with their families in adjusting to the experiences of end stage renal disease. In a group work, patients work together and engage in physical, social as well as psychological activities that reduce the social and emotional stresses that come with chronic renal disease concomitants such as; shortened life expectancy, an altered lifestyle where many changes occur for the patient and families, sexual functioning, time consumption, financial stress, social and vocational stress as well as treatment system which is complex.
Group work in social work functions as a multidisciplinary team which is responsible in fostering treatment which is positive to the chronic renal patients. All the cultural, ethnic and religious differences are dealt with among patients and their families while respect for those patients is held for the individual independence and choice. Before and after patients undertake dialysis, group members in social work provide education and emotional support for patients and their families. In group work, it is easy to carry out the activities in social work for the patients without discrimination of patients.
Activities for the group work in social work for the chronic renal patients include; psychosocial evaluation including assessment for treatment plan, casework like counselling and conferences with patients, families, and support networks; crisis intervention; goal-directed counselling and discharge planning, providing information to patients and referral, group work education, emotional support, self-help for the patients and their families, information and referral, facilitation of community agency referrals, team care planning as well as collaboration, advocating on behalf of the patients’ within the setting and with appropriate local, state, and federal agencies and programs and programming, provision of patient and family education. 2. Outline the type of group, 1 purpose statement and 3 aims outcome statements that are be appropriate for this situation.
(100 words) Purpose and Aim Type of Group This is a structured social work group. Structured groups organise and integrate connections with other individuals to help in reducing stress or loneliness (Rengasamy 2011, p.7). Purpose Statement The main purpose for the group is serving in social work intervention so as to help chronic renal patients on adapting with dialyses or removing their fear from starting dialysis Aims 1. To educate chronic renal patients of the importance of dialysis as the best treatment that they can seek 2.
To provide emotional support for the patients and their families so as to overcome the effects of dialysis treatment 3. To sensitize and remove fear in patients so as encourage them in seeking dialysis for chronic renal disease 3. Outline and discuss the proposed leadership structure of the group. (450 words) Proposed Leadership Structure The structure of a group is very important in defining the roles that specific individuals will play in the social work activities. A sound leadership structure ensures that activities run smoothly and ensure the dreams of every member are achieved or transformed into reality through the reliance of systems that deliver success for the group members (Vrouvas 2015, p.1). The proposed leadership structure of the group will be functional and involving; the chairman, steering committee, social workers, managers and members.
Chairman The chairman will play the role of the leader in the group. All the final authority of the group is centralized on the chairman. The chairman will oversee the administrative functions within the group. As the leader of the group, the chairman will enact various roles as well as occupy locations that are different all through the life of the group. The role of the chairman will shift along a continuum ranging from primary, to variable, to facilitative. This will depend on the needs, capabilities as well as the characteristics of the group members (Horejsi & Sheafor 2006).
Read More