How Is Global Poverty Viewed in the Modern World - Essay Example

Global Poverty Global poverty is de d as the lack of basic necessities that human beings require across the globe. In essence, it is a lack situation where material possessions such as money are out of reach. Moreover, it could be argued as the economic inequality especially in a diverse society. Apparently, poverty reduction has become a key goal and project for most global such as, United Nations and World Bank (Hulme 50). Initially, the International Organizations and some of the developed countries have taken the responsibility of providing Aids to most of the third world countries so as to curb the poverty levels across the world. Never the less, a substantial percentage of the Aids has arguably not been used effectively by the developing countries and in light of this, the global poverty has been noted to increase rather than decrease. Thus, Aids from developed countries does not fix global poverty effectively because most of the time, the aids from other countries are not distributed to people who need them. According to the World Bank statistics in 2011, it is estimated that around two billion people across the world are living in extreme poverty. Out of the estimated two billion, around 49% are from Sub Saharan Africa (Hulme 52). In fact, social philosophers argue that a roughly part of the people in the world live below $ 2.50 per day. Of most importance is that extreme poverty is a global challenge as it has continuously persisted in several parts of the globe with inclusion of some of the developing economies. Notably, most third world countries fall under the category of developing countries that are in dire need of aids from the developing countries. Basically, aids are mostly used to handle issues such as food, health and developmental issues that pertain to social –economic development in the given countries ( Pogge 38). The mandate of dealing with foreign aid is mostly given to governments concerned. None the less, it has emerged that some of the governments ruling in developing countries have been faced by incompetency they do not use foreign aid that has been granted to them for its intended purpose, but instead divert it to other uses. Proponent of argument that Aids from developed countries do not fix global poverty effectively insist that people from developing countries must learn to be self reliant in fixing poverty related issues (Muller 327). Similarly, not many people practice morality and ethics as would be expected in delicate situations. For instance, the author argues that ethical distinction is witnessed between a people from Brazil who prefers to make money from selling a child who is homeless to organ peddlers and an American who has an existing TV set, but decide to upgrade been well aware of the fact the money could be used as donation to organization that deal with saving children with needs (Muller 328). As a result, the developing countries end up not solving their poverty related issues such as lack of medicine for diseases such as malaria and HIV/AIDS, food shortage, unemployment among other issues. Instead, they have continuous deplorable situations emanating from these challenges. In addition, some of the leaders involved are ignorant of the deplorable situations that their people are going through, and as such they do not bother offering suggestions and assistance that could be used to curb the level of poverty. In light of this, it has been ascertained that most people around the globe are not in positions that allow them to afford basic commodities such as food, shelter and education. As such, they continually hope that they would at a point receive aid from countries that are well off. In contrast, the processes of distribution from the developed countries to the point where given countries receive the aid either in material or monetary form is at time distorted. Such situations where aids undergo improper distribution mostly emanate from extreme corruption dealings that are performed both or either governments. It is apparent that corruption is not only practised by developing countries but by developed countries too. For instance, a developed country like United States may decide to take preference in giving aids a specific developing country over another despite the urgency that is required. Moreover, those involved may decided not to take the intended process to the end, meaning that the aids program has hitches. It is argued that, most of the developing countries are third world countries. Essentially, these countries have huge agricultural lands, which are used for growing different varieties of products that are then taken abroad for purposed of more refining. In fact, most third world countries are the source of raw materials which are then moved to developed countries for more refining. As a result, developing countries end up selling these and other products relatively cheap to assist in curbing poverty and improve developmental activities (Pogge 39). Conversely, these countries are not self sufficient particularly in economic perspective because they spend more money producing raw material and later earn less selling the products. Therefore, their economic life where poverty revolves around remains dependent to developed countries. Needless to mention, aid from developed countries can never be enough hence, developing countries need to come up with strategies that could improve their economic perspective leading to self reliance and or less dependence on aids. Opponents of Aids from developed countries do not fix global poverty effectively In opposition, not all philosophers agree to the fact that aids from developed countries do not fix global poverty effectively. This is because most developing countries still need aids from the developed countries, a situation that allows them to handle most of the poverty related issues in a better way to a point of curbing it. Apparently, the developing countries that are lucky enough to receive aids must be from developing countries where corruption is arguably minimal. If that became the case, then it is obvious that the developing countries could manage their aids in a proper manner. Managing the aids means that they can handle their poverty issues in accordance to the needs of the people. Most of the poverty related issues in most developing countries are food shortage and diseases. Once these two issues have been handled then it become easier for the given countries to continually improve towards self reliance thus withdrawing from foreign aids dependency (Pogge 37). Additionally, opponents have also argued that although developed countries might not handle the issue of aids for developing countries forever, some of these developed countries have taken their position in the economic circles meaning that they are capable of aiding the developing countries for as long as they would because they can afford. According to Muller (337), genetically engineered foods might not serve as a relief to world hunger. In fact, a report released by the UNDP, the developed countries have been cited to assist developing countries unlock the potential of biotechnology. Response to the issue of Aids from developed countries does not fix global poverty effectively According to Muller (332) it is evident that most children all over the world are the most affected by poverty. In fact, these children die as a result of lack of food and or medical care. In this regard, concerned governments should increase their aid allocations to allow the equitable distribution of the burden to all tax players involved. For instance, it is argued that households should develop a culture where they continually save a specific amount of money yearly and later give out as donations toward the world’s poor population. Similarly, money that had been put aside to spend on luxuries and thing that are not necessary should be given away as donation. Evolutionary psychologists argue that the nature of human beings is not sufficient enough to allow the give out to people they do not know. This means that their human nature facts are correct but their moral conclusion does not add up Muller (332) .In light of this, Bob becomes one of the many victims who could be said to be failing to live a morally decent life because has been torn by the guilty of making a decision on saving the life of a innocent child who need his assistance and sacrificing most of his savings. In reference to this most African countries that belong to developing countries have expressed their fear pertaining to the aids that emanate from developing countries arguing that most of foods they receive in term of aid is genetically modified or GMOs and these aids are mostly made from products that are not safe for human consumption due to their pollen will ‘contaminate’(Muller 335). None the less, research has indicated that most GMOs are the best products for growing because they can be able to resist diseases and pests that mostly affect normal products. Thus, most developing countries require such products to feed their population and reduce the poverty level as required. In a general sense, I am a proponent of the argument that Aids from developed countries does not fix global poverty effectively because most of the time, the aid from other countries is not distributed to people who need them. Works Cited Hulme, David. Global Poverty: How Global Governance is Failing the Poor.New York: Rouledge. 2010. Print. Muller, Gilbert. The New world reader. Thinking and writing about the global community. Mason cengage learning.2008.Print Pogge, Thomas. World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity, 2008. Print. Read More