Critical of Three Articles - Literature review Example

Critical Review of Three Articles School Critical Review of Three Articles Good research is founded with a dedicated and diligent attention to detail. The results of any given research will only be as concrete as the basis upon which it is founded. This paper will define three of the sources used to prove the necessity of nurse practitioners in modern health care. By examining, F. Baums ‘Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting in Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity though Action on the Social Determinants of Health’, J. Beards ‘Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health’ and T. Eikemo’s ‘Health inequalities according to educational levels in different welfare regimes: a comparison of 23 European countries’, we will prove the depth of quality information that has gone into every detail of the initial paper. Showing the previous research bears fruit in relation with current papers helps to solidify the bridge to the next revelation. Critical review of F. Baums ‘‘Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting in Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity though Action on the Social Determinants of Health’ Led by Fran Baum (2009), Monique Begin, Tanja Houweling and Sebastian Taylor the paper ‘Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting in Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity though Action on the Social Determinants of Health’ Baum is a quality example of well thought out detailed work. Each author holds a PhD level certification and at the time of the work each held different positions at various worldwide universities and colleges. Standing behind the prestigious combination of contributor’s, there is an extensive history of continuous research and devoted energy. The team led by F. Baum, has brought together many strands of social inequalities and illuminated a possible path towards future rectification. Intended for professionals and peers this paper delves into causes and results of social based actions. Aimed directly at the actors that take part in the health care field across the world, F. Baum and his companions attempt to strike a chord for a revolutionary form of thinking. By focusing on possible government agencies and institutions that could have a real effect on the health care situation the authors of this paper sought to address fellow peers and regulators everywhere. From the inception, this research was intended as a method to draw back the curtain on the social implications to the modern health care field. Drawing a direct line from the state of society to the state of health care and then proving the vital need for a robust Health Care management system, F. Baum envisions a world that reaches out to entire populations not based entirely on fiscal advantages. Focusing on the process that takes place with many health care institutions this paper attempts to present new and potentially relevant arguments that are aimed squarely at the neglected sectors of society. This philosophy is the basis for the entire publication; the needs of the many must be better met before the needs of the upper tier can progress further. Using the latest information and quality data this team of authors paints a attainable goal set in a workable environment. At first glance the title ‘Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting in Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity though Action on the Social Determinants of Health’ seems to daunt the average reader. Within the text of this truly inspirational article are several ways that could be applied to many cultures the world over. Using the information in this article, it would seem that a healthier world population would be to the benefit to the world at large. Summed up best in the phrase ‘By finding a new path forward together our future can produce ever greater health care accomplishments’. Critical Review of, J. Beards ‘Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health.’ Written by J. Beard (2009) and his company of able professionals, ‘Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health’ provides a very concise insight into the health care picture of rural populations the world over. By concentrating on the needs of those furthest from traditional sources of health care this papers attempts to first describe then diagnose their plight. The overriding theme in this research is the value of education and reevaluation of the traditional roles of health care that by applying new solutions to old issues better health is possible for everyone. The team that created this paper has many contributors led by Professor John Beard of the Center for Urban Epidemiological Studies of the New York Academy of Medicine, his team consisted of three very talented professionals Arul Earnest, Geoff Morgan and Nola Tomaska. The team effort in identifying potential areas of improvement is readily apparent to the open mind. This research was intended as a starting off point for future argument concerning the validity of improving the rural health out reach. Seeking to highlight the available options, the authors presented many existing condition that many other peers can make ready use of. Focusing on their professional caste, the authors sought to provide the caliber of research necessary to advance to the next level of health care. Specifically written to describe the obvious disparity in care levels caused by the rural divide, this research quickly reveals the possibilities, both positive and negative that can occur without a proper approach to the growing problem. This study goes into detail, identifying many of the primary factors that are present in many rural health care situations and offering new and innovative alternatives to the traditional model. Very effective in their approach the team that created the paper ‘‘Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health’ we successful in presenting a plethora of usable and applicable research information. Focusing on a neglected area that is once again coming to prominence the rural health care situation is very ably related in this study. Critical Review of T. Eikimos ‘Health inequalities according to educational level in different welfare regimes: a comparison of 23 European countries’ The team led by T. Eikimos (2011) study, ‘Health inequalities according to educational level in different welfare regimes: a comparison of 23 European countries’ seeks to define the social implications of health care. Tying social economics to the vast gulf in the level of available care in certain cultures, the author’s ably illuminate the differences and identify possible areas of weakness that could be positively affected by social initiative. By approaching a traditional health care issue from a social perspective, this study presents an example that is forthright and honest, completely aware of the realities that exist in the fiscal world that exists today. Every author on the team led by T. Eikimos stands among the professionals of their fields. Mr. Eikimos holds position at the Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology and SINTEF Health Research, Norway, as well as positions at Department of Public Health, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. His colleague Martijn Huisman, the second author holds positions at Department of Public Health, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands and Interdisciplinary Centre for Psychiatric Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, and The Netherlands. Their fellow author Clare Bambra holds position at Centre for Public Policy and Health, Durham University, UK. Finally their colleague Anton E. Kunst holds position at Department of Public Health, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam and The Netherlands. Combined, these authors comprise a truly professional group of talented authors approaching a highly sensitive yet necessary subject with dignity and due diligence. This study was aimed squarely at identifying the width of the inequalities, both of the health care system and the educational systems, between the different governmental entities. By identifying the weaknesses and the correlating rise in health care cost the need for a comprehensive solution seems all the more clear. This teams approach from the beginning focused on the future need for a plan that would reach out and address the inequalities present around the world. Defining patterns and their link to further progressive areas the true picture of the state of the health care and education becomes very clear. By offering stark evidence of the disparity between competing ruling philosophies, this research is a stark road map on the road to equality. From the outset this research study shows a harsh reality. The disparity between various sections of the world, often divided by fiscal means, has a very clear and defining influence on the measure of the quality of health care and the value of the educational system within these regimes. Examining the world as a single entity reveals the advantages of equalizing the weaknesses and shoring up the world wide strengths. With valuable and original research these authors find fertile ground by taking note of the separate institutions and the very brutal effect that those same offices can have on society. A solid fact bearing instrument, this study confirms what many had already found, the state of health care and the education system is strictly influenced by money and the satisfaction of the society. In Conclusion When approaching any research problem, the quality of information determines the results of the work. By identifying relevant articles that not only touch on but clearly add to the position of the studies is essential. The combined works of F. Baums ‘Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting in Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity though Action on the Social Determinants of Health’, J. Beards ‘Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health’ and T. Eikemo’s Health inequalities according to educational levels in different welfare regimes: a comparison of 23 European countries’ have given researchers room to look ever further into the next level of revelation. The level of professionalism behind every fact in all of these papers reflects a level of peer accepted science that is necessary when seeking to formulate a respected opinion. Providing an available and nimble support increases the final weight and overall standing of the end product of any research. As an example of the truly top tier research, journals and academic alike look for many common elements. Provided that the background of the author meets the level of scrutiny needed and the talent to present their thoughts in a coherent manner such as those presented here, such research is found to be both compelling and inspiring. The ability to forge new and innovative paths into the chosen field of research, such as health care and education, is sure to continue to develop in a positive and complete manner. References Baum, F., Begin, M., Houweling, T. A., & Taylor, S. (2009). Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. American Journal of Public Health, 99(11). http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2008.154856 Beard, J., Tomaska, N., Earnest, A., Summerhayes, R., & Morgan, G. (2009). Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on rural health. The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 17(1), 10-15. http://nrha.ruralhealth.org.au/otherconferences/docs/RRHSS%20authors%20papers17Jun08.pdf Eikemo, T. A., Huisman, M., Bambra, C., & Kunst, A. E. (2011). Health inequalities according to educational level in different welfare regimes: a comparison of 23 European countries. Sociology of Health and Illness. Retrieved January 27, 2012. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01073.x/full Read More