Regulating Gun-Control & Public - Assignment Example

Download file to see previous pages It would be pertinent to identify the various kinds of arms regulation, put forth by those who advocate them before we understand the dynamics of arms regulation issues. Gun controls are of various kinds, but we shall discuss the most recently executed methods which the scope of this discussion encompasses (Poe, 2001).
Presently, in most of the cities and states of the country, an obligatory waiting period is enforced which is one the most common kind of gun control. This period is usually from three to seven days and the purpose is to slow down the purchase of a gun in order to harness an impulsive desire to execute a crime. A waiting period is often advocated by its proponents due to the reason that in case a person was not happy with someone else and wished to harm that person, he or she could satisfy his or her frustration more easily in case of quick access to an available source of firearms (Poe, 2001).
A popular notion about the waiting period is that it delays people wanting to arm themselves, and hence this way their negative emotions for others subside. However, this reasoning can very well be rejected. A killer would not pass up his decision of terminating someone just on the ground that he had to wait a week. In his hurry to commit a crime, the person would simply go ahead and grab a weapon illegally in order to carry out his plan (Lott, 2000).
Some people opine in this regard, that a common person would not know how to get a gun unlawfully and only real criminals have such access. However, the same people suggest that there should be restriction on arms access since criminals have open access to guns. Also waiting periods do not ward off crime. A prospective criminal could still exercise patience and let the waiting period pass after which he could kill the person. He could either get hold ...Download file to see next pagesRead More