LGBT is a Bad Idea in Universities - Case Study Example

LGBT Housing LGBT housing is a bad idea in university because of its negative implications to the broader university community. Recently, there has been a considerable debate on whether it is morally right to legalize LGTB. Lesbians, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGTB) individual have been facing a particular set of challenges including becoming homelessness, discrimination among other form challenges. In addition, LGTB faces social stigma while others get rejection by their families that may eventually cause emotional pain, as well as physical strains. This paper will discuss LGBT housing by emphasizing that LGBT is a bad idea in universities. LGBT housing is a bad idea in university because housing is discriminative in nature. According to (Cochran) , Barry Magee, who is the Director of Resident Life, argues that housing LGTB will create an environment where allies of LGTB community as well as those individuals who are identified as LGTB come together and share comfortable conversations . In addition, Magee said that housing of LGBT will create a safer atmosphere in the campus for the LGBT community by bringing the community together. Rather than creating a safe environment, housing of LGTB will convey discrimination on the Campus. Researchers argue that the main ground of discrimination and especially in a school environment is a negative perception. The perception that a particular set of group of the individual is more important that another will cause students uproar. Housing of LGBT will act as a transparent base for comparison of beliefs and personal behaviors and as result safety the safety of the student will reduce. In most cases, every action that is conducted towards schoolmates, classmates among others will be evaluated on the basis of LGBT (Lee 205). LGBT housing is a bad idea in university because of academic reasons. Social relationships are very critical, both in schools and outside school. Good relationships raise the self-esteem of students and more importantly their way of expression. Self-esteem in school enables students to identify their better performers on campus comfortably and as a result making them their target to their academic improvements. Housing of LGBT will be creating a barrier by which students will be interacting. For instance, it will be exceptionally peculiar to find a member of LGBT community interacting, leave alone taking an academic project together with others for fear of discrimination. Fundamentally, different tutors and professors have different teaching methods. In some situations, some lecturers may be forced to divide student into groups for discussions while, in other cases, these groups may be assigned outside classroom assignment. Due to a weak relationship that is between the LGBT students and the non –LGBT, academic performance is significantly influenced. Alternatively, professors may be required to form educational groups or any activity that must be performed in groups based on LGBT (Lee and LaDousa 138). LGBT housing is a bad idea in universities because it encourages immorality. Every activity that is undertaken in the university must adhere to the rules and regulations of the campus. Housing of LGTB basically means that the management of the university has entirely permitted LGTB in the university. Despite the fact that every individual rights have to be respected, most universities consider it unethical to allow LGTB in universities and especially housing them. The decision to provide housing to LGBT is a very critical decision. The management may be required to consider the repercussions of permitting the act. For instance, permitting LGBT can result in high levels of immorality in the campus environment including prostitution, lesbianism, bisexual, transgenderism among others activities. A significant increase in LGBT will counteract the core purpose of the campus (Stanley). LGBT housing is a bad idea in universities because it increases health problems. The housing of LGBT means protecting the LGBT community from any harassment by bringing them together. According to (Cochran), housing will demand the formation of an LGBT anti-harassment team. Such level of protection will encourage more individual to join the community. There are various health harms that are associated with LGBT including STIs, HIV/AIDs among others. Physicians argue same-sex individuals are at a greater risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases than heterosexual individuals. For instance, gay sex exposes the men to a greater risk of contracting diseases. Human physiology makes it clear that the anus was not designed to accommodate the sexual activity. Biologically, the rectum is radically different from the vagina concerning the appropriateness for the penetration of a penis. Naturally, the vagina has natural lubricants and more importantly, it is supported by a network of muscles. It is also equipped with a mucous membrane that allows it to tolerate friction without damage. On the contrary, the anus is a fragile mechanism of small muscles which can lead to chronic diseases if frequent stretching and friction is applied. For instance, due to the fact that gays, lesbians among others are protected, they may tend to transform the campus into an avenue for their sexual activities. An increase in these sexual activities in a school can be considerably tragic to the university and the society as a whole (Lee and LaDousa 132). LGBT housing is a bad idea in universities because it encourages substance abuse. A considerable number of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, as well as transgender, put up for fear of stigmatization. Very few individuals have the courage to be identified as a lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. In addition, the greater part of them does not seek heath advice or health care due their negative experience. This is because most LGBT patients are rarely asked about their sexual orientation. Most physicians, as well as health professionals, tend to assume that their patients are heterosexual, homophobic as well as hostile thus preferring to avoid the issue of sexual orientation. Therefore, a greater part of them get consolation by abusing drugs. Report on drugs and alcohol and drug abuse in the LGTB suggest that more than one-third of the population is affected by alcohol and drug abuse. In addition, the report accounts for the major differences in the frequency of drug abuse and the drinking pattern of the LGBT with that of heterosexuals. The report suggested that the greater part of these LGBT is alcoholics and substance abusers, recovering alcoholics or recovering drug addicts (Lee 405). LGBT housing is a bad idea in universities because it is expensive. Regardless of the mission, the movement cost is a very critical element to consider. Every activity that requires fund necessitates authorization from the relevant authorities. These authorities include the head of departments, the boards of directors, and the schools management among other individuals. Recently, a nationally recognized organization that is dedicated to making universities safe hands and more inclusive spaces for LGBT individuals indicated that most universities are failing to provide financial support to carry out campaigns regarding LGBT. Among the main reason, universities and colleges may be reluctant to support housing to LGBT is the reputation. The greater part of universities get may be reluctant to finance LGBT as they consider the movement as not serving the interest of the broader university community (Witten and Eyler 145). LGBT housing is a bad idea in universities because it is against most mainstream religions. Many religions, if not all that are practiced in the United States are against legalization of LGBT not only in universities but also in the society. A significant number of universities in the United States are based on the religious principle. In other words, regardless of how right a situation may appear to be, if the activity does not adhere to the religious belief and practices of the campus, the management of the school may be reluctant to authorize the activity leave alone provide financial support. Over the last years, various religions have been considering support for the LGBT as a sinful activity in the society as well as in campus. Various religions, especially Christianity entirely support sacred relationships where individuals of different sex get married and get together to form a family. Any activity that goes against this fact is considered to be evil irrespective of the supporters (Witten and Eyler 132). It is evident that housing of LGBT is bad on the basis of academic performance, religious conflict, cost, immorality, substance abuse and discrimination. Most school administrations do not like to cause uproar among the majority non-LGBT community due to the support of the LGBT community. Housing of the group is a sensitive issue that bears many negatives. Works Cited Cochran, Maia. Proposed LLC to support LGBTQ community. 12 August 2014. http://www.idsnews.com/article/2014/12/proposed-llc-to-support-lgbtq-community. 15 April 2015. Lee, Elizabeth M. and Chaise LaDousa. College Students’ Experiences of Power and Marginality: Sharing Spaces and Negotiating Differences. New York: Routledge, 2015. Document. Lee, Rita. "Health care problems of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients." Western Journal of Medicine (2000): 403–408. Document. Stanley, Kim. LGBTQ Pamphlet. 2007. http://www.depts.ttu.edu/scc/virtual_library/lgbtq.php. 15 April 2015. Witten, Tarynn. M and A Evan Eyler. Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Aging: Challenges in Research, Practice, and Policy. Florida: JHU Press, 2012. Book. Read More