Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1684214-answering-question
https://studentshare.org/sociology/1684214-answering-question.
Success in his view was a personal thing and did not entirely require assistance. Lincoln, however, claims that once one is successful, one should avail this chance to someone else. This meant that any successful techniques pass to the next person. Traits of business, character, observation, and wise decision-making, ought to benefit society and not oneself (Hill, 2008). In this regard, Lincoln views success as a community thing, which ensures growth and continuity. Martin Luther argues that we operate in a network of reliance. Depicting one should not lead a life as a loner but as a society helping each other to lead comfortable lives.
Bellah argues American culture of upholding and idolizing its leaders led to the deterioration of humanity. With the pursuit of personal success at heart, Robert claims that there are no more communitarian principles in America (Fischer, 2013). The quest for power in the market economy plays a vital role in the success of mentorship. With this in mind, Robert states that this degraded society. Depicting that one is not responsible for anyone. This is not entirely correct. Society is not a man-eat-man society but should at all times provide a helping hand to the ones in need. Luther grew from a humble background (Winkle, 2007). Lincoln realizes that he did not come from a renowned family while running for presidency (Press, 2013). This realization propelled Lincoln to campaign for communitarian principles for the less fortunate. Establishing foundations, which cater to such needs. Pointing to the fact that we are not encumbered only to those whom we care about only. Lincoln motivated American society by sharing his triumph story that prompted the youth of that time.
The links of mutual responsibility imply the realization of one's assistance in others’ lives. The balance between the quest for personal victory and community support is crucial for the growth of humanitarianism. For instance, Lincoln abandoned his family home in search of success. Failure to realize one's need in the community leads to self-pursuit (Winkle, 2007). However, Abraham grew up in a humble background, and his departure and disregard for his family led the youth to think this was a real success. Despite their noble tolerant and hardworking character in him, the nation’s young generation moved from home responsibility to self-made goals. Some equilibrium is essential to become successful. Luther interconnected society pointing at the need for brotherly care for one's neighbors (Bulmenfed, 2012). Martin’s quotes show the need for society to the pursuit of achievements.
In conclusion, the community works like a net. For it to record growth and humane conditions, everyone should consider the neighbor. Society shapes the character of the youth while at the same time fueling and motivating them to attain their goals. The youth, however, depends on the community to purchase their goods if they start a business or nurture their talents to benefit the individual and the public. The creation of a balance that allows the individual to attain their goals is necessary. Burdening one with a task in society with no immediate motivation declines their morale. Personal growth yields innovation since it allows the individual to develop their talent.
Read More