The concept of democracy is indeed an extraordinary idea and can refer to a truly revolutionary idea in the human affair’s history (Schumpeter, 2013). A government of the people by the say of the people is an ideal way…
Download file to see previous pages...
In such a case, the rule by the people emerges largely as a symbolic sideshow whereas the actual exercise of political power happens behind the scenes. Carl Schmitt offers a suitable platform of analyzing the validity of democracy especially in his book the concept of politics.
Many describe Schmitt as having attempted to drive a thick wedge between liberalism and democracy. They see Schmitt effort as trying to undercut the assumption that the rational discourse and the legal formalism would be the basis of legitimacy. Schmitt’s contribution to the political theory characterizes the advancing view that genuine politics was irreducible to the view of socio-economic conflicts and thus unconstrained by people’s normative considerations. The view of Schmitt is that the essence of politics is indeed a battle to grave between a friend and an enemy. Many of the analysts of Schmitt works during his era saw them as an opportunistic embrace of the Nazism, that if embraced in the current world setting then everybody would kill each other (Schmitt, 2008).
The Schmitt’s notion of the political ground tends to dissociate democracy from liberalism thus more controversy arises from the constituted, parliamentary legislation, and rule destined practices of general elections that mostly characterize the modern democracy ordinary workings. In this perception, the major question stems on Schmitt radical perspective of the world constituted the democratic politics in the Weimer Republic. Schmitt took democratic ruling as the self-rule of the people thus the decisions that rulers make represents and articulates the will of the people (Schmitt, 2008). However, his view of the principle of democracy opens to different competing interpretations.
What many people need to understand that the political practice forms an identity of the sovereign will of the citizen and is not a
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Such occurrences may include but not limited to: fire, floods, wars, terrorism and earthquakes. Giorgio describes it as ‘‘a state of disequilibrium between public law and political fact,’’ It becomes challenging for a government to balance between the law and the political state of a country.
However, with the appearing of the Government Institute, the distinction of the enemy from a friend became the task of the State leaders.Carl Schmitt is regarded as the prominent jurist and the contemporary legislative system originator. As the author of the “Concept of the Political” as well as “Political Theology” works, he is regarded as the key theorist for defining the definition of an enemy within the frames of the political realism concept.
Thus, ideology in this wise, is identified in what we do and not in what we know or are our beliefs. Our belief in an ideology is thus placed in advance of our taking into account that belief in "belief machines". An example of this is Althusser's Ideological State Apparatuses.
ute not anything less than the appearance of the first truthfully postmodern international following form."(1) Postmodernity in the background of international relations primary of all income post-sovereignty. The European Union (E.U.), as it now calls itself, is thus a famous
xxxv). Many psychologists ridiculed his work because his ideas were so vastly different from what was currently available at the time. He dismissed the idea that therapists were the ones who knew what was best for their clients and put the responsibility onto the
Yoo’s advocacy of his form of political realism harks back to the writings and political philosophy of Carl Schmitt in often reprehensible ways. Like Schmitt, Yoo has shown himself to believe that the Executive, and government in general, must, at times, be
The work and efforts of Carl Schmitt can be studied in the era of World War I where Nazis and the rest of the world were engaged in a fight. And the fight was meant to conquer whatever the fighting nations might possibly. Duncan Kelly explains that Carl was of the view that a state could be brought to unity if it were correctly represented by its representative.