Inequalities in Arrest Rates of Minorities - Assignment Example

623833_revised.docx Prospectus of Inequalities in Arrest Rates of Minorities Prospectus of Inequalities in Arrest Rates of MinoritiesOver the last 25 years, the level of criminal injustices among the African American youths increased drastically. Many Negro youths engaged themselves into criminal activities that landed them into correctional facilities giving rise to a degree of racial inequalities amongst the blacks within American prisons. This prospectus seeks to establish the cause of these criminal activities among the African American youths and what relevant measures to take in order to burry social injustices in this minority community.

This paper will carry out research within American penitentiary facilities and seek to find out the factors leading to overrepresentation of Negro boys in prisons.This paper argues that in most American juvenile correctional facilities, the highest number of inmates composes of young African Americans. Documented evidence associates this influx with poor development of social skills within the African American community, school dropout or failure, and inadequate support from both the school and the community.

In addition, my research stretched its rope and found out that overrepresentation of young Negros in many detention centers has everything to do with the process of adjudication (Skogan & Frydl, 2004). This prospectus established that frequent arrests, baseless detentions, unwanted prosecution, and unruly detention commitment among the law enforcers of white origin contribute largely to inequalities in arrest rates of minorities in the United States of America.Furthermore, this paper sought out that African American disproportionate confinement resulted from incarceration rates based on the fact that a higher number of youths in this minority community commits many crimes.

These incarceration rates contribute hugely to high adjudication rates. The paper sought to compare the rates of arrests and rates of incarcerations between young men of African American decency and young White nationals. It established that incarceration rates among young boys from the African American minority group comprised of 80 percent since most of the arrests made resulted from racial differences. The prospectus also found that White government officials plot to arrest minorities, especially young black boys because they wanted to fulfill their dynamic prophecy, which claims that African American minorities have a high tendency of taking part in criminal activities.

Moreover, this prospectus came across tangible evidence on disproportionate confinement within juvenile detention centers. It found it worth noting that in Minnesota, there is a 4-year sentence staged aside for those whom law enforcers seize using crack cocaine for the first time. On the other side, it has probation for those nabbed using powdered cocaine for the first time. This paper found out that, police arrested 92 percent of African America youths in possession of crack cocaine, whereas the Whites found in possession powdered cocaine comprised of 85 percent only (Korgen, 2008).

Therefore, the disparity of the arrests carried out in Minnesota alone displays the overrepresentation of young minority boys of African American decency.Finally, this prospectus used different tools of data collection that included social construction tools and Marxism. It obtained all the information from different websites, books, government statistics, as well as documented evidence. After examining all the collected data, this proposal found it necessary to call for government transparency in cases regarding arrests, adjudication, and treatment within the America juvenile delinquent correctional centers.

This is because, the disproportionate confinement of black community minority group exist in crucial areas regarding critical decision making during the process of convicting a minor and consequently pronouncing detention.ReferencesKorgen, K., (2008). Contemporary Readings in Sociology. California:Pine Forge Press.Skogan, W. & Frydl, K., (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: the evidence. Washington:National Academies Press.