About Hurricane Katrina - Essay Example

About hurricane Katrina Many people consider today that the US President, government and local ities are much responsible for hurricane Katrina consequences. This issue is very interesting and controversial. This issue is increasingly important in this age of global natural catastrophes such as terrible hurricanes as well as other consequences and results of global warming. Many people believe that the activity of the US President, government and local authorities can be highly evaluated and the steps which were taken by them can be accepted as successful and productive, but these people overlook a lot of facts which assert another point of view.

Furthermore, such fact as insufficient governmental measures in evacuation, provisions for the poor, elderly and those without automobiles, emergency response, reluctance to accept foreign assistance and other defects indicate the government responsibility for the hurricane consequences. In this essay, I will argue that the US President, government and local authorities' measures are inadequate for hurricane Katrina economic, politic and social consequences overcoming, and that state authorities should make more efforts for future global natural catastrophes prevention and consequences overcoming.

There are some reasons for those who consider the contribution of the US government. However, it cannot be ignored and overlooked that these means were insufficient and inadequate. There are some eloquent examples which illustrate this point of view. "Many critics have noted that while the local government gave a mandatory evacuation order on August 28, before the storm hit, they did not make provisions to evacuate the large numbers of citizens unable to evacuate themselves" (from Wikipedia).

In addition to that there were poor steps made to evacuate people of low income, unabled and homeless. There were no enough cars for evacuation. After the hurricane there were a lot of people suffering from hunger and lack of aid, and there were nobody to help them: "More than two and a half days after the hurricane struck, police, health care and other emergency workers voiced concerns in the media about the absence of National Guard troops in the city for search and rescue missions and to control looting" (from Wikipedia).

The US President Mr. George W. Bush didn't take effective part in putting things in order: "True, while Bush enjoyed his vacation and strummed his new guitar, a great city was being devastated by water rather than fire" (from Wikipedia). The Department of Homeland Security also didn't make adequate steps for the disastrous situation settling. State of Luisiana officials delayed to make measures. In addition to that "Several foreign leaders have expressed frustration that they couldn't get a go-ahead from the Bush Administration to administer help" (from Wikipedia).

There are many other examples which illustrate inadequate reaction of the US authorities.I have argued that that the US President, government and local authorities' measures are inadequate for hurricane Katrina economic, politic and social consequences overcoming. It is necessary to not admit such situations and fallacies in future.SourcesCriticism of government response to Hurricane Katrina. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina)