Jurgen Habermas's critique of the Frankfurt School's ideological commitments regarding the onto-teleological unfolding of history was the basis of his more general critique against the normative foundations from which they used to launch their attack against the culture industry and capitalism…
Download file to see previous pages...
A proper explication of communicative rationality is embedded in his analysis of life-world and its fundamental tension to system in contemporary civilization. Moreover, his sociological interpretation of the role of agency and the problems of structure offers insight to the fundamental importance of the public sphere a fundamental element of Habermas's positive program vis--vis communicative action/rationality. In this paper, I will provide a summary of communicative rationality as regards the Problems of Agency and Structure coupled with my own reflexive commentary on the readings associated with these topics.
Niemi (2005) and others offer that the immersive nature of language, that is, language is that which we are born into, usually into the language of our parents or culture, and this fundamentally structures rationality and not merely the evidence of our application of reason or the instrument of that reason. Other accounts of rationality such as Kant's depend on a transcendental process, which fundamentally massages and mediates our structures of thought. These transcendental structures offer the "view from no-where" perspective of reason which is mediated through our manifold of sensible intuition. Habermas's model depends on coordinating social action, that is, action between at a minimum two agents. Habermas reasons that this is only possible if and only if there is a shared set of rules of linguistic interaction plus some recognized, if only implicitly, agreement on meaning and syntax. This sort of conclusion devalues or finds insufficient the sort of strategic or instrumental reasoning that seeks to manipulate natural laws and social facts that is indicative of the natural or pure sciences. This reasoning furthermore does not evaluate normatively the goals of it manipulation, or seeks to develop a basis from which to judge the efficacy of its ends. This rationality is the hallmark of system-rationality, which occurs "from above" and seeks to dominate by functioning as a machine which implements mass conformity.
Communicative Rationality depends on the interaction of two agents through language, with the intention of achieving something other than a desired result, though a desired result can be had in the offing, but something like what might be called "understanding" or agreement (Nemi 2005, p. 218). In other words for communicative rationality to be effective in must occur wherein neither agent is interested in "influencing" the other. This type of rationality lies in distinction to instrumental or strategic reasoning, which almost exclusively requires that language be implemented to achieve a desired result or cause an action. Communicative rationality is not a method to reach veridical statements of fact, but instead a process or an interaction in which language is used to create agreement or disagreement, but at least some shared understanding which can be carried forward to other engagements with other interlocutors. Communicative Rationality works coordinatively and not hierarchically.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Contemporary Sociology Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/sociology/1521528-contemporary-sociology
(Contemporary Sociology Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
“Contemporary Sociology Book Report/Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1521528-contemporary-sociology.
The opposing view, however, focuses on the notion that America was formed by a group of ‘immigrants’ and that immigration is the very foundation of what constitutes being an American. For those who adhere to the notion that immigration is the center of our society, the question then comes, when did it change?
Considering that the educational system is caught in between the political and social conflicts, it may be a challenge for teachers and school administrators to maintain an unbiased social and political view. This is because part of the school funds came from government subsidies, and it is likely that some of the schools policies and ideals are inclined to support specific political and social views.
The author states that social change is one of the manifests of modernization in the U.S. It is influenced by culture diversity which is an aspect of modernization as it involves the collection of different ideology. The U.S has a form of synchronizing multiple communities into a minimal number of communities that are rich in diversity.
Further it can be demonstrated that one's ethnicity is unable to stabilize identity because, like any other word, it turns out to be interchangeable in a system of differences.
If one simply says "identity", it is not clear whether he is talking about identity in a Cartesian, Enlightenment sense or identity in a Rushdian sense.
But just reading the words written by Pierre Bourdeu is not enough, especially for the layman. His prose is often difficult to read, and each sentence requires careful analysis.
When he speaks of habitus, as he does in the article being reviewed here, he does not offer a simple definition.
In simple terms therefore, globalisation can be taken to mean a process that seems to bring uniformity and universality to the whole world. On the other hand, when globalization is viewed in the sense of connectivity in economic and
ing evidence from a historically broad range of cases, and by more broadly conceptualizing the conflict that surrounds them as existing within a range of social adaptation possibilities” (Harper and Le Beau 171). Of specific interest to the authors is how in general Marginal
It gives a greater understanding of world population and factors affecting it. During this lesson, we were introduced to demography as a study of population. In addition, we also talked about the patterns of the world population growth. This is under various phases
Eyewitnesses testified that the police involved in Gray’s arrest used brutal force during the arrest that might have resulted in spinal injuries (Fantz & Botelho, 2015). Gray’s death led to violent demonstrations by Baltimore residents, compelling
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Contemporary Sociology for FREE!