Ethics and Argumentation - Assignment Example

Critical thinking, at a personal level, is thus the first step to conscious reconciliation of conflicting ideas between the different thoughts acquired from the different social experiences by team members, and by extension to the right decision making with the highest achievable benefits to all. In effect, critical thinking is helpful in cutting through complex situations via asking the right questions, framing oneself in clearly audible, correct and understandable manner, and the subsequent implementation of appropriate solutions; for this is “the true competitive edge that separates successful individuals, organizations, and/or societies from the also-rans" (Rieke, Sillars, & Peterson, 2008).

Anne Rice (1985) sumps up the very importance of critical thinking to argumentation as follows: “Very few beings really seek knowledge in this world. Mortal or immortal, few really ask. On the contrary, they try to wring from the unknown the answers they have already shaped in their own minds -- justifications, confirmations, forms of consolation without which they can't go on. To really ask is to open the door to the whirlwind. The answer may annihilate the question and the questioner.” Q. . Nonetheless, they are all argumentatively valid when weighed against the prevailing norms and values considered morally proper.

To be sure, arguments are constructed to jolt understanding into believing, saying and/or doing something in such a way that derives the justification as being in agreement with reason (Van Dun, 2009). Deductively, norms and values form the core of everyday ethical conduct. That is to say, ethics gives the very basis of understanding whether opinions in altercative debates are right or wrong and how to respond, with the context taken into consideration. Individuals react to circumstantial happenings in different way, but so are dictated by built-in value systems moderating action.

Ethics, therefore, defines how individuals’ lives, in effect, giving substance to their personality. Most critically, ethics play a fundamental role in presenting a counter-evidence to an opposing opinion in a more respectful manner, and without necessarily destroying personality at the other end. Q. Argument in Favor of Working in Learning Teams Right from the schools projects to the task accomplishments in the work place, the use of teams has been embraced wholesomely as a learning tool for individual as well as organizational development prospects.

To be sure, teamwork has become more prevalent in educational institutions, for they form the foundation through which individuals horn their skills of working with others at the organizational level. Teamwork engage individuals in discussions that bring on board varied experiences with a much raised platform for individuals to learn more. At the core of such team working dynamics is the acquisition/transfer of skills for "executive consciousness"