We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Criminal justice class ( Police deception during interrogation) - Term Paper Example

Comments (0)
Police Deception During Interrogation Name Institution Course Police Deception During Interrogation Deception is a technique frequently used and accepted in police interrogations. Deception techniques are always employed with the aim of getting evidence from suspects…
Download full paper
Criminal justice class ( Police deception during interrogation)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Criminal justice class ( Police deception during interrogation)

Download file to see previous pages... History In the past, there were no common laws that limited the use of deceptive interrogation techniques. However, in the 18th and 19th century, there was an increase in judicial concern over the use of abusive means in obtaining confessions from suspects as evidence in court. In the year 1783, a court in England made the first ever decision to exclude a confession obtained through torture. In the 19th century, an American court followed in the footsteps of the English. Soon, the use of a confession obtained through physical or psychological torture was not allowed (Magid, 2000). Police deception was first discussed in the Supreme Court in the year 1959. The court realized that some false confessions were obtained as a result of fatigue, official pressure, and aroused sympathy resulting from police deception during interrogation (Leo, 2008). In 1966, the court insisted on the application of the 5th amendment’s protection from compulsory self-incrimination during interrogation by the police. The introduction of Miranda rights further complicated the applicability of deception during interrogation. Despite these rulings, there is no law prohibiting the use of deception during interrogation. Ethical Concern Deception techniques used in police interrogations vary widely. ...
seriousness of the implications of the crime, threats, promises about less jail sentence in the case of collaboration, and claims of the existence of a valid witness (Leo, 2008). All of these forms of deception are considered to be legal. According to Magid (2000), there arebfour assumptions made when using deception in police interrogations. The first is the assumption of guilt. Police officers work with the assumption that the suspect is guilty until proven otherwise. Secondly, the officer assumes that the suspect is dangerously guilty. The officer should be ready for danger and know that the one who has much to hide will be the hardest to get information from. Police officers deal frequently with the worst of people, situations, and places and must handle them in a context of assuming they are dangerous. In this ‘great guilty place’ the police officer understands that people have committed many crimes for which they were not arrested, obligating the police officer to feel guilty. There are various reasons for which testimonial deception might be undertaken during suspect interrogations. Some of them are signs of corruption, such as the criminal conduct of the investigator to cover up for their investigative incompetence. It can also be motivated by the wish to make sure that those who are either morally or factually guilty face justice. Police officers only have the task to deal with factual guilt and not legal culpability (Leo, 2008). This way the final say on the eligibility of evidence collected during interrogation lies with the jury. When the systems work correctly, it means criminals get what they deserve, society gets protection from probable lairs and predators and thus liberty is secured. There are various reasons for which testimonial deception might ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
A. The statistics at the FBI show that in 2009 there were 6,604 incidents of hate crime, with 8,336 victims and 6,225 known offenders of the crimes (About hate crime statistics, 2009, 2009). B. The FBI refers to hate crimes as crimes of bias, meaning that it is done because the offender holds bias against the victim in relationship to prejudices that they hold (About hate crime statistics, 2009, 2009).
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
Miranda Warning, How it changed Police Interrogation
A Supreme Court case that changed the nature of police investigations, and specifically suspect interrogations was Miranda v. Arizona. Prior to Miranda, the legal rule for assessing the validity of suspect confessions was voluntariness.
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Position Paper for Criminal Justice Class
The type and extent to which the victims suffer injury is one of the considerations, for the sake of the definition. The degree and nature of the victims connection to the acts of the offender is yet another consideration (Andrew, 15). In law also, the definition of a victim also depends on whether the victim was at fault at the time the offense leading to his injury occurred.
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper
Term paper for criminal justice class
A crime is a legal wrong. It is an act, default, conduct or omission which is prejudicial to the society, the commission of which warranties punishment either by way of imprisonment or payment of a fine as a method of punishment or both, and or any other appropriate form of punishment as Courts deem it fit in a just society.
15 Pages(3750 words)Term Paper
Term Paper for Criminal Justice Class about plea bargaining
However, the foundations of plea bargaining are a throwback to the adversarial system of justice, whereby the main function of the system trial is to identify the material truth and ascertaining which contesting party can offer a better case. Pleas are supposed to be tendered during trials not to be rewarded but to as part of the procedural system.
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper
Theories of crime paper for criminal justice class
On the other hand, Boone County musicians saw them as rebels who have either psychological problems or socio-economic issues (Doering & Nitzberg, 2009). This paper analyzes the case of the Whites in the documentary film The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia, produced by Doering and directed by Nitzberg (2009).
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper
Deception in Criminal Justice
The criminal history started there has not stopped yet and continued, continuing and will continue through generations in different shapes. As the technology advances, so is the nature of the crime also. There are no
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Criminal Justice / Police & Community Relations
Community policing requires that the community is integrated in the whole security strategy, and it is accountable for any crime that takes in its neighborhoods. This theme is advanced based on the realization that the community knows which people within that
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
Criminal Justice
This has created two rifts of ideologies as pertains to the death penalty debate. While some argue that certain types of offenders deserve the death penalty, others view
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
Answer the question for criminal justice class
One of the constitutional violations represented in the movie is bribing aspect of the former Luzerne County Judge by the name Mark Ciavarella Jr. Bribery is unconstitutional and hence the judge violated constitution by accepting bribes (Ecenbarger 4). The judge also
1 Pages(250 words)Term Paper
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Criminal justice class ( Police deception during interrogation) for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us