Max Weber, a proponent of symbolic interaction theory, asserts that people act as per their own interpretation on the meaning of the world.The philosophy was later introduced by George Mead to American Sociology in the 1920s…
Download file to see previous pages...
Max Weber, a proponent of symbolic interaction theory, asserts that people act as per their own interpretation on the meaning of the world.The philosophy was later introduced by George Mead to American Sociology in the 1920s There is a widespread belief in the society that ethnicity plays a role while awarding death penalty to the convicts. My partner also believes so; the other day he initiated the discussion on this matter.My Partner: I strongly believe that racial discrimination does exist in the US criminal justice system. Although the US constitution speaks about equal rights and equal treatment to all yet this discrimination widely prevails. I: What made you think like that? Well, I will take recourse to social process theory also called symbolic interaction to address your viewpoint on this. We all provide subjective meanings without thinking what is correct objectively. We all interpret one another's behavior and that is how society is constructed. Everyone knows that criminal is a criminal regardless of their ethnicity and background. If people from a particular socio-cultural group do more heinous crime then it is quite likely that more people from that particular group will be awarded death penalty. Won’t you agree with that? My Partner: But, the thing is that racial minorities are meted with the death penalty in large numbers. For example, between 1995 and 2000, 183 accused were convicted for death penalty by federal prosecutors.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The Death penalty deters people from committing murders. It can save lives as it acts as a remedy against frequent murders. The death penalty is more human than other forms of severe punishments. By enforcing capital punishment there is the possibility of removing a potential threat to the society.
Arguments in support and in opposition of capital punishment or death sentence have been on academic discourse and moral as well as religious circles for quite sometime. The proponent’s grand argument has been that whenever murderers are sentenced to death and later executed, criminals or would-be criminals committing the same are made to rethink their approach to life.
Opponents of capital punishment argue that there is little evidence to support a deterrent effect, and that any net balance that may be theoretically achieved through its use is offset by a variety of ethical and practical problems.
At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified?
Due to the nature of the death penalty, which involves one person being put to death by another, many people have doubted as to whether or not the death penalty is the most moralistic way to go about making a point. The death penalty has evolved immensely over time, but the intentions remain to be the same.
On one side of the issue, the death penalty is based on the concept of an ‘eye for an eye,’ and that one should receive the corresponding punishment for one’s actions. On the other side of this issue, the death penalty is considered an inhumane and a harsh punishment to implement within an imperfect criminal justice system.
Examples of this are ritual human sacrifice, physical torture that is condemned by many nations worldwide and slavery that has been abandoned largely. Relics of these practices may go on, but those are anomalies that go on to underscore the facts that the world is turning against these evil practices.
Imposition of the death sentence does not necessary mean that the offender will be executed since there is a chance of appeal or even commutation to life imprisonment.
This paper, therefore, tries to answer the question: should
Various states have had their opinions about death penalty with some upholding it while others scrapping it from the laws. However, there exists no general agreement as to whether the death penalty is an effective punishment to deal with
These reasons include murder, rape, adultery, arson attack, terrorism and so on. The justice systems in various countries have analyzed the reasons for penalizing the criminals. The analysts have found discrimination in terms of class, race and gender
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Disparity in the Conviction Rates of Different Ethnicities in Death Penalty Cases for FREE!