The Connection between Human Rights and Social Work - Research Paper Example

? The Connection between Human Rights and Social Work School: Article one identify all human beings as equal and born free, in the areas of rights and dignity. Therefore, based on their personal conscience and reason, they should relate with one another in a manner that depicts brotherhood (U.N., 1949). This article relates to social work ethics since it defines the fundamental moral outlook that the cultural and social differences between different people should not be a basis for bestowing human dignity and rights (NASW, 2013). The article links with the ethical code of respect for fellow workers and clients because the article directs that human relations should be based on brotherhood. The article links with the ethical code of discrimination as it abolishes all grounds for discrimination that include inequalities and freedom-domination measure. Besides the article links with the ethical code on using social and political action to protect all people by offering direction on the social action of brotherly relations (U.N., 1949). The article is related to the ethics of social work because it encloses the different ethical principles that guide the practice of social work. These ethical principles include a service outlook where the main focus of the article is guaranteeing that all people receive equal service; they should be allowed the freedom to get services and their dignity and rights should be safeguarded through and during the service of social workers (NASW, 2013). The ethical principle on social justice is connected to the article because it requires equal treatment of all people in the areas of according them dignity, rights, and freedom. The third ethical principle is the dignity and the worth of the person, which forms the basis for the freedom, equality and the rights accorded to all people (NASW, 2013). The ethical principle insisting on human relations is related to the article because it defines the outlook of human relations, where all are accorded freedom, equality, dignity, and their rights. The ethical principles on integrity and competence are related to the article, as they guide the choices and the care to be exercised by the social work, during the course of their work (U.N., 1949). Article 2 states that all people are unrestricted to all the freedoms and rights contained in the declaration, without consideration of the distinctions of color, race, sex, religion, language, national or social origin and political opinion among others (U.N., 1949). This article is related to social work ethics, as it expressly disqualifies cultural and social diversity as the grounds for entitlement to rights and freedoms. In addition, it warrants the respect of all people, irrespective of their differences by nullifying all grounds of discrimination and incorporates social and political values in demonstrating the equality of all people (U.N, 1949). The article is related to the ethics of social work, as it is directly linked to the ethical principles that guide the practice of social work. The article is connected to ethical principle of service, as it requires social workers to accord service to all their target clients, with regard to their rights and freedoms, disregarding all grounds of human differentiation, including race and religion (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethical principle on social justice since its definition of social justice is that a person’s rights and freedoms are to be decided on the ground of social justice, and not other prejudiced standards like race as required in the social work code of ethics (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethical principle on dignity and the worth of the person because human dignity and the worth of the person are the only grounds that should be regarded when according humans, the rights and the freedoms contained in the declaration (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethical principles of integrity and competence, because integrity and competence should be the guiding principle in evaluating the access of individuals to the different rights and the freedoms (U.N., 1949). Article 3 provides every person a right to life, security and personal liberty (U.N., 1949). The article relates to social work ethics, as it disregards cultural and social diversity in qualifying the rights of persons (NASW, 2013). The article bestows respect for all and eliminates all the grounds that could be used for discrimination without providing exceptions when qualifying the protection and the liberty of different people (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethics of social work, as the rights of security; life and personal liberty are encapsulated in the ethical principle of service, because social workers are required to protect these different areas of human entitlement (U.N., 1949). The article is connected to the ethical principle of social justice as it is the only basis on which the social worker determines the person’s rights to security, life, and personal liberty. For example, in the case where the personal liberty of one person violates that of others, the social worker is expected to recommend the restraint of the liberty of the one person, so they can preserve that of the many others (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethical principle of dignity and the worth of the individuals, as it is used as the main consideration – by the social worker – when determining the entitlement of individuals to personal liberty, life, and security (U.N., 1949). The article is connected to the ethics of social work due to its reliance on the integrity and the competence of social workers – whose determination of the individual’s entitlement – determines the rights expressed through the article (NASW, 2013). Article 4 states that no person should be held in servitude or slavery, and slave trade shall not be condoned, no matter its form (U.N., 1949). Consequently, there is a link between this declaration and the social workers code of ethics since it disregards all social-cultural diversity that can be used as the basis to subject people to slavery or servitude (U.N., 1949). The article declares respect for the freedom of all, and abolishes all grounds of discrimination, which include slavery targeted at the powerless. The prohibition of slavery, like it is stated in the article, is linked to social and political actions, which are among the ethical code areas for social workers. In this case, the article is connected to the code ethics of social workers because its definition of slavery, servitude, and slave trade is grounded on the ethical principles of social work. The ethical principle of service is connected to the article because it requires social workers to exercise care so that they can serve the best interests of all people – including the one subjected to slavery and the slave holder (U.N., 1949). The article is connected to the ethical principle of social justice, because it defines social justice as the only grounds upon which to determine relationships between people, and abolishing those that qualify as unfavorable to the rights and the freedoms of all parties (NASW, 2013). The article is connected to the ethical principle of dignity and the worth of the person since it is the main ground upon which human relations are reviewed from (U.N., 1949). The ethical principles of integrity and competence guide the social worker’s determination of favorable and unfavorable relations, where some of the unfavorable relations include slavery (NASW, 2013). Article 5 states that no person shall be exposed to torture, inhuman, cruel or degrading punishment or treatment (U.N., 1949). This article is related to the ethics of social workers since it disregards social and cultural differences as factors that can determine the unwarranted treatment of people (NASW, 2013). In addition, the article is related to the ethics of social practice as it demands total respect for all people, eliminates all forms of discrimination, and offers the platform for the definition of inhumane or degrading treatment, which can be pursued through social or political action. Moreover, the ethical principles that guide the work of social workers are among the guiding principles for using the article. For example, with regard to the ethical principle of service, the article’s definition of torture, cruelty, and inhumane treatment is determined by the social worker, which highlights the importance of ensuring that the service of the social worker be in the best interest of the client (NASW, 2013). The article is related to the ethical principle of social justice because the service of the social worker, in upholding the freedoms and the rights of individuals, is founded on preserving justice (U.N., 1949). The ethical principles of integrity and competence are related to the article since the integrity of the social worker determines the definition of the conditions facing individuals, and the solutions offered to the situation (NASW, 2013). On the other hand, the article is related to the ethical principle of competence required from a social worker because their competency influences the definition of unfavorable treatment and is likely to determine the conception of the solutions developed (NASW, 2012). Article 7 states that each person shall be treated equally before the law and shall get the due protection, without any discrimination or the violation of the declaration (U.N., 1949). This article relates to the ethics of social work as they disqualify all bases for discrimination, and require the respect of all (NASW, 2013). In relation to the social workers’ code of ethics, the article requires that social work services should work in the interest of the client, due to their intrinsic worth, and the service should be guided by objectivity and integrity in ensuring the protection of the client receiving the services (NASW, 2013). Article 7 is related to the ethics of social work because the article offers guidance for the work of social workers. For example, the article is connected to the ethical principle of service, because it requires the services provided by the social workers to be guided on equal treatment before the law without serving clients based on discrimination. The Article is related to the ethical principle of social justice because it lays the groundwork or the social justice standards to be observed by the social worker. For instance, during service delivery to clients, the social worker’s observance of social justice should not violate the individual’s entitlement according to the declaration (NASW, 2013). Service delivery should also not be influenced by the social worker’s discrimination of the clients, whatever the grounds they may use to discriminate (NASW, 2013). The article is related to the ethics of social workers as the ethical principle of dignity and the worth of the person guides that social workers to provide services based on the dignity of the person, and not other considerations (U.N., 1949). The ethical principles of integrity and competence are related to the article as they guide the determination of equality, the worth of the person and the regards given to service delivery. Article 9 states that no one shall be subjected to arbitrary detention, arrest or exile (U.N., 1949). In relationship to social work, this article discredits the use of social and cultural differences as basis for the treatment of people, particularly with reference to issues related to detention, arrest, or exile. The article requires that all people, despite their differences, get accorded their respect, and that social work service should be administered in the interest of the client, and the respect of the individual should be guided by the person’s intrinsic value (NASW, 2013). Meeting the standards of the article requires social workers to depict objectivity and integrity, and that the delivery of their services should serve the interests of their clients. The article is related to ethics of social workers and in particular the ethical principles that guide a social worker’s practice. For example, the ethical principle of service guides the determination of warranted arrest, detention, and exile. The ethical principle of social justice defines the arrest, the exile or the detention that a person can be subjected to, because a failure to regard this would most likely protect the selfish interests of criminals (U.N., 1949). The ethical principle on upholding the dignity and the worth of the person is related to the article because the article defines corrective measures that can be used with different people, without regarding all areas of prejudice (NASW, 2013). The ethical principles of integrity and competency are employed as guiding principles for the determination of the subjection of individuals to detention, arrest or exile because the social worker should determine what is allowable and what is not allowable. Article 10 states that every person is entitled to get a fair, public hearing by a tribunal that will ensure impartiality during the determination of charges leveled against them, as well as the conception of their rights and obligations (U.N., 1949). This article is related to the ethics of social work as it guarantees that clients will access impartial services where they are not discriminated on the basis of their social or cultural differences (NASW, 2013). The article connects to the ethics of social work as it requires that every person be accorded their due respect, and that the process adopted in determining their offenses or rights – be that which serves their best interest. The article is related to the ethics of social work as it guides the service delivery of social workers to their different focus groups. This is clear from its definition that all people hold the right to get a fair hearing, under conditions that offers them an impartial hearing (NASW, 2013). This shows that the social worker’s ethical responsibility to preserve social justice is reckoned, requiring them to engage the public hearing process, where they feel that the process does not serve the interests of the client (U.N., 1949). The ethical standard of regarding the dignity and the worth of the person is related to the article because it requires the social worker to guide the process, towards ensuring that the person’s entitlement is observed. The ethical principles of competency and integrity are appealed among social workers, as they are required to exercise informed judgment and to protect the values of social work. Therefore, the article increases the commitment and the attention offered to clients, by social workers. Article 11 states that any accused person should be considered innocent until they are proven guilty, and that they cannot be considered guilty for any actions, or omissions, which do not amount to an offense in nature, when it was committed (U.N., 1949). This article is connected to the ethics of social work since it discredits the consideration of social and cultural differences in determining the treatment to be accorded a person despite accusations or the commission of acts that are considered wrongful (NASW, 2013). In this case, the article’s relationship to the social workers code of ethics is that it provides for all people, including clients, to get the respect they deserve due to their intrinsic self. In addition, it connects to the ethics of social work, as it discredits all forms of discrimination, including those that may serve in the interest of the social worker. In effect, this article requires service to be administered in the best interest of the client (U.N., 1949). This connects to social workers’ ethical principle of service that provides for social workers service in the best interests of the client (NASW, 2013). The ethical regard for service guides workers to uphold the value of regarding the accused person as innocent, until they are proven to be guilty (NASW, 2013). In addition, the ethical regard for social justice guides the conception of the rights of individuals, including that they should not be held accountable for actions or omission that were not committed with wrong intent, but which amounted to wrongful acts after time (U.N., 1949). The article is related to the ethics of social work by its requirement to let the worker engage theory integrity during the determination of what is right and what is wrong. The article is connected to the ethics of social work because it tasks the competence of the social work in upholding the interests of the client – regardless of their circumstances, including acts omitted or committed (NASW, 2013). Article 13 states that each person holds freedom of movement and residence at any state. It also states that all people have the right to leave any country and to return, including their home country (U.N, 1949). This article connects to the ethics of social work since it regards the interests of the client above all others, and it accords them the respect they deserve from authorities. The article connects to the ethics of social work because it discredits all forms of discrimination including the basis of nationality, and advocates the change that serves the interests of the client (NASW, 2013). In particular, the article has a relationship with the social workers code of ethics’ ethical principles that guide the practice of social work. These ethical principles include service delivery to serve the interests of the client because all consumers, despite their nationality and residence, should be served as well as the natives of the country in question (NASW, 2013). Under the ethical principle of upholding social justice, the social worker is compelled to uphold the different freedoms of the client, including that of movement in order to serve their best interests. The article is related to the ethical principle of dignity and the worth of the person because they are the major considerations taken into account when determining the client’s access to services (NASW, 2013). The ethical principle requiring competency from the social worker is related to the article, because the article offers the client, the right to access services and equitable treatment, despite their place of residence and their situation. References NASW. (2013). The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics. U.N. (1949). United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948. United Nations Retrieved on April 20, 2013 from lexmercatoria.org Read More