Death Penalty - Research Paper Example

Many nations worldwide has currently abandoned the usage of the death penalty. Consent against the use of death penalty has not been formed by the world (Stuart, 2002). The most popular countries worldwide, China, executes a lot of people yearly and the United States which are the most powerful nation uses death penalty time to time. Worldwide, eighty four nations have retained the use of death penalty. On the other hand, the number of nations using death penalty is reducing and there are possibilities that worldwide opinions and pressure are going to gradually influence all nations in abandoning death penalty.

This paper will look at the trends used in eradication of death penalty and advantages and disadvantages of death penalty. Trends in Eradicating Death Penalty Worldwide In 1986, forty six countries had eradicated death penalty for normal crimes. After sixteen years, the number of nations in the same group had doubled to eighty nine. Furthermore, other twenty two nations had stopped implementing death practice, bringing the total number of countries that did not implement death penalty to one hundred and eleven.

In a book on world advances in the death penalty, the author Roger Hood stated that the yearly average rate at which nations have eradicated death penalty has risen from 1.5 to 4 yearly (Harold, 2008). In a world whereby death penalty has been put into place in nearly everywhere, abolition is an intense turn around. Even though formal abolitions of death penalty dates from 1870 for Netherlands, 1846 for Michigan and 1867 for Venezuela, many movements implemented in eliminating capital punishment has been recent.

Reasons why many nations have eradicated death penalty in increasing ways differ. For some countries, it was a comprehensive human rights understanding. Spain abandoned death penalty in 1995 asserting that it had no place in the advanced penal system and civil societies. On the other hand, Switzerland eradicated the death penalty because it contained a right to dignity and life flagrant violation (Harold, 2008). Advantages Of Death Penalty The crimes of treason, rape, torture, murder, kidnapping and larceny balance on moral codes that escape apodictic evidence by professional testimony.

Many communities would fall into anarchy in case they do not act on moral assumptions that are less certain. Abolitionists may oppose that death penalty is integrally immoral. This is because governments are not supposed to take human life no matter what the aggravation (Di Tella, Edwards and Schargrodsky, 2010). This is not a fact, but an article of faith. Additionally, death penalty honors dignity of individuals. This is by treating the person defending himself as a moral actor free and able in controlling his own purpose for ill or good.

This does not treat the defendant as an animal that has no moral sense. Because execution methods may lead to pain, either as inescapable death consequences or accidents, this does not establish the sort of impartially intolerable danger of harm. This harm is qualified as unusual and cruel. Kentucky has implemented an execution method supposed to be more humane than the death penalty (Corey Lang, 2000). This was shared by another thirty five states. The decision made by Kentucky in adhering to its practice cannot be seen as probative of the wanton pain infliction in the