Download file to see previous pages...
This has caused critics in light of their differences, with each person trying to extrapolate on the basis of the explanation. Renowned academicians have had their fair share on critics on each other especially in reflection to power and control of the people that are involved (Gidden, 2010). For instance, Marx Weber states that power is a resource that should be utilized in the world. He defines power as a resource that some people have at the expense of other people that do not have. In such a circumstance, people have to take power from others and control other resources. The other people that do not have power have little or no control as they do not have the discrepancy as such. According to Marx Weber, power is defined by a few people that are in control. Steven Lukes steps in to criticize power in a more radical way. He states that power is a continuous exercise which involves two different parties. While some parties will have power, the other parties do not have power to control the people that have power. According to Lukes, a single party will exercise power and use the power to gain control over some issues. In such a situation, the other party does not have control. There will be a divergence of interests as the party with power will exercise the power contrary to the interests of the other party. At times, the party that does not have power will be aware of this, while at other times, the other party will not have a clue as to the actions of the party that is in power. Steven Lukes criticizes power in stating that it has three faces (Gidden, 2010). In the first face, Lukes states that the parties make a mutual decision as they are participatory. Though they are involved in making the decisions, they are only allowed to participate to a certain extent, as their interests have to be catered for. Since they are both involved in the decision making process, their interests are guaranteed. However, this depends on the bodies that are in power as they have the overall power on the decisions that are made. This creates an all inclusive scenario where all the parties that have interests are engaged in decision making. The second face as stated by Lukes is that, there are instances on non-decision. In such a scenario, the people in power set up an agenda where they have control of the decisions that will be made. Part of their agenda is to create a scenario where decisions will not be reached. Certain decisions will never be reached, despite any effort from the people that have lesser control and power. In such a position, the interests of the people that do not have power are jeopardized. Therefore, the people in power have a leeway of making decisions on behalf of other people (Gidden, 2010). This is absolutely done to ensure the people in power have their interests at hand. The people that do not have power have their interests at stake as they will never reach to a decision that will protect their interests. The third face as explained by Lukes states that decisions are made according to the interests of the masses. People in power make decisions so that they can cater for a whole community of the people. This is a contrary opinion which is a critique against Weber’s definition of power. In such a scenario, the people in power make decisions which are inclusive of the interests of all the other people. The desires of everyone are included in the decision making. Though the people in power make such decisions to please everyone else, their interests are also protected. Therefore, these decisions are not made to please an individual but are
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
“With greater power comes greater responsibility”, as Spiderman is famously quoted over and over again. The concept by which our cartoon hero has been fighting over is in fact more contentious and controversial in the real world; specifically in the academe.
The causes of human behaviour are difficult to be identified; in fact, even when human activities are set under close monitoring it is still possible that the causes of human reactions to various events are not explained. On the other hand, there are certain characteristics of human behaviour that have been considered as being quite important for understanding the reasons that led humans to follow, under specific terms, similar behavioural rules.
In an individual context, the feeling of not having any power over the social ambience in which one lives, over the people and groups that one comes across in one’s day to day life, over the events that collectively constitute an individual’s life, or over the varied aspects of one’s personal life could indeed turn out to be very disturbing and enervating.
According to the research findings, the power of Ethernet is a very environmentally friendly option in that it helps save energy, and is consistent with the work culture of the contemporary organizations which calls for greater flexibility of placement of equipment and reduction in the time and cost of installation of devices.
Faces of Power The nature of power is a social structure where the power itself is the ability to acquire what a person wants; basically, different forms of power have dissimilar objects and pathologies. Moreover, power can be broken down into different forms i.e.
"It is often stressed that today, the division of powers, as organized by the Treaties, is not clear enough" (Pris, 2000, 4).
Secondly, and more interesting in scope and under scrutiny for the purposes of this discussion, is the separation of powers between the Council, Commission and the Court of Justice.
In creating an environment for performance, organizations must continuously innovate to survive and to lead as well. Innovation deals with searching for creative solutions to human relationships, structures and processes, and ability to assess and adjust to the changing environment.
These are derived either from the position held by the leader in the organization (position power) or from the individual regardless of his/her position in the organization (personal power). Position power comprises of legitimate, reward and coercive power while personal
The concept of power may be précised further by adding that the command given by a person who imposes power should be obeyed by others. Power is to pursue one’s own objectives against the will of others.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Steven Lukes and Webers Definition of Power, and the Advantages of the Three-Dimensional View of Power according To Lukes for FREE!